[issue28094] Document behaviour of Process.join() in multiprocessing

Berker Peksag added the comment: Thanks for the explanation. We usually handle situations like this in the same issue so I'm closing this as a duplicate of issue 10673. Could you please attach your patch to issue 10673? Thanks! -- resolution: -> duplicate stage: -> resolved status:

[issue28094] Document behaviour of Process.join() in multiprocessing

Tom Clark added the comment: I thought that, since Issue <10673> refers to the library rather than the docs, it was better to create a seperate documentation issue. In other words, I probably overthought it. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue28094] Document behaviour of Process.join() in multiprocessing

Berker Peksag added the comment: Hi Tom, thanks for the patch! Issue 10673 is still open, is there a reason not to attach your patch there? -- nosy: +berker.peksag ___ Python tracker

[issue28094] Document behaviour of Process.join() in multiprocessing

New submission from Tom Clark: #10673 indicated that the issue should be resolved by clarifying the documentation. The proposed patch is intended to do this. -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation files: multiprocessing.patch keywords: patch messages: 275943 nosy: