[issue29143] Logger should ignore propagate property for disabled handlers.

2019-05-30 Thread Mario Corchero
Mario Corchero added the comment: Closing as unable to reproduce. Please comment if you can reproduce the issue and we can have a further look. -- stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker

[issue29143] Logger should ignore propagate property for disabled handlers.

2019-05-27 Thread Mario Corchero
Mario Corchero added the comment: Note that "handlers" cannot be disabled. This applies only to loggers. Also, the following code shows that disabling the logger does indeed prevents all logs in emitted by that logger from appearing: ``` import logging parent_handler =

[issue29143] Logger should ignore propagate property for disabled handlers.

2018-10-04 Thread Oleg Serov
Oleg Serov added the comment: I tried and failed to reproduce. If it changes, I'll update it. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue29143] Logger should ignore propagate property for disabled handlers.

2018-09-22 Thread Karthikeyan Singaravelan
Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment: Can you please attach a script that has a relevant sample logging configuration along with the output you are expecting? Thanks -- nosy: +xtreak ___ Python tracker

[issue29143] Logger should ignore propagate property for disabled handlers.

2017-01-03 Thread Oleg Serov
Oleg Serov added the comment: > 1. I have some random logging configuration with some logging handlers that > have "propagate = True" Read as: 1. I have some random logging configuration with some logging handlers that have "propagate = False" --

[issue29143] Logger should ignore propagate property for disabled handlers.

2017-01-03 Thread Oleg Serov
New submission from Oleg Serov: Looks like if I have a logger handler with propagate = False and it is disabled, the "propagate" is still in affect. I am considering this is a bug, because: 1. I have some random logging configuration with some logging handlers that have "propagate = True" 2.