[issue32715] Make create_unix_server for SOCK_DGRAM work

Yury Selivanov added the comment: Hm, maybe I'm mistaken here, but I have no time right now to confirm. I'll reopen the issue so that we can consider this (and especially SEQPACKET) for 3.8. Sorry for insta-reject :) -- resolution: rejected -> stage: resolved

[issue32715] Make create_unix_server for SOCK_DGRAM work

holger added the comment: Could you please tell me which exact posix document and paragraph says that? In Linux sending can fail but once sendmsg worked the message is enqueued on the other socket

[issue32715] Make create_unix_server for SOCK_DGRAM work

Yury Selivanov added the comment: SOCK_DGRAM is never reliable, even for AF_UNIX. It might appear reliable to your test code, but there's no guarantee for that under any OS in Posix standard AFAIK. -- resolution: -> rejected stage: -> resolved status: open ->

[issue32715] Make create_unix_server for SOCK_DGRAM work

New submission from holger : The current implementation verifies that the sock passed is a stream socket. This limitation appears to be arbitrary and is limiting. * An AF_UNIX SOCK_DGRAM server socket becomes readable when one can accept(2) it. Just like SOCK_STREAM. *