Changes by Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk:
--
nosy: -BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3539
___
___
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
I'll close this unless anyone shows some interest in it.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: open - pending
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3539
Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org added the comment:
Mark, the proper way of closing an issue is to test first if the problem
still exists.
--
keywords: +gsoc
nosy: +skrah
status: pending - open
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Fascinating, three days from the second birthday, the OP isn't interested,
nobody else is interested but it can't be closed. Clearly I'm missing
something. Shall we leave this issue until it gets to it's 10th birthday?
--
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org added the comment:
Yes, if it's still a problem.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3539
___
Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org added the comment:
Mark, instead of using sarcasm, it would be more productive to research
this bug. Skip has given a hint that the search terms VPATH or Makefile
might be relevant. Searching for VPATH immediately yields issue 1613,
which looks very
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Stefan, I'm not interested in researching something that has been available for
others to research for two years, I don't understand why they aren't interested
and I don't care. If noone can be bothered with an issue why leave it to
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org added the comment:
2010/8/8 Mark Lawrence rep...@bugs.python.org:
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Stefan, I'm not interested in researching something that has been available
for others to research for two years, I don't
Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org added the comment:
If VPATH is intended to work without doing `make distclean` first
in the root directory, then this is still valid. I'm not sure if
this is the case though (see also issue 1613).
cd py3k/
./configure --with-pydebug
make
mkdir debug
cd
Changes by Skip Montanaro s...@pobox.com:
--
nosy: -skip.montanaro
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3539
___
___
Python-bugs-list
New submission from Skip Montanaro [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I usually build Python directly in my source repository (the directory
containing the configure script). Accordingly, I have .o files scattered
throughout my sandbox.
Today I decided to build --with-pydebug, so I created a debug directory,
11 matches
Mail list logo
