[issue37356] Name of 64-bit OpenSSL v1.1.1 DLLs

2019-06-21 Thread Phil Thompson
Phil Thompson added the comment: A clarification... It seems the suffix is added when configured as VC-WIN64A but omitted when configured as VC-WIN64A-masm. ...still not a Python problem. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue37356] Name of 64-bit OpenSSL v1.1.1 DLLs

2019-06-21 Thread Phil Thompson
Phil Thompson added the comment: I think I was incorrect in saying the suffix was the default when building v1.1.1 from source, so any problem I have (trying to share the DLL with different pre-built packages) is not a Python problem. Sorry for the noise. -- resolution: -> not a bug

[issue37356] Name of 64-bit OpenSSL v1.1.1 DLLs

2019-06-20 Thread Steve Dower
Steve Dower added the comment: Yes, I noticed that they changed with OpenSSL 1.1.1a, but as far as I can tell we didn't do anything to cause that - our build definition is still the same, and uses "perl Configure VC-WIN64A-masm && nmake". Is this causing issues? Or is it just something that

[issue37356] Name of 64-bit OpenSSL v1.1.1 DLLs

2019-06-20 Thread Phil Thompson
New submission from Phil Thompson : In the 3.8b1 64-bit Windows installer the names of the OpenSSL DLLs do not have the -x64 suffix which seems to be the convention (and is the default when building OpenSSL from source). The convention is followed in the 3.7.0 to 3.7.3 installers. I haven't y