[issue3736] super is a built-in type

2008-10-01 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: The super() docs have been updated to be more clear. It is still listed amongst built-in functions -- that list doesn't separate callables that are also types, so super() is appropriately listed side-by-side with tuple(). --

[issue3736] super is a built-in type

2008-08-29 Thread Tarek Ziadé
New submission from Tarek Ziadé [EMAIL PROTECTED]: super is defined as a built-in function http://docs.python.org/dev/library/functions.html but it is a type, shouldn't it be replaced ? -- assignee: georg.brandl components: Documentation messages: 72174 nosy: georg.brandl, tarek

[issue3736] super is a built-in type

2008-08-29 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Am already working on the docs for super(). -- assignee: georg.brandl - rhettinger nosy: +rhettinger ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3736