[issue37480] add ptpython to list of alternate interpreters

Stéphane Wirtel added the comment: Thank you for the proposal but I close this issue because I think the wiki is a better place. -- resolution: -> rejected stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker

[issue37480] add ptpython to list of alternate interpreters

Stéphane Wirtel added the comment: In this case, maybe you could change the name of the PR and of this issue. Thank you -- nosy: +matrixise ___ Python tracker ___

[issue37480] add ptpython to list of alternate interpreters

Zach Valenta added the comment: Terry, I agree w/ you that this info has a better home in the wiki. Just commented on the PR to say as much there. I'll update the PR per Kyle Stanley's suggestion and port the info into the wiki. -- ___ Python

[issue37480] add ptpython to list of alternate interpreters

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: My problems with this chapter are that it mostly ignores Windows, omits IDLE which has most of the 'advanced features' discussed, and some others (I could fix this), confuses a bit 'interpreter' as code executor versus 'interactive interpreter' as interface

[issue37480] add ptpython to list of alternate interpreters

Change by Zach Valenta : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +14351 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/14538 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue37480] add ptpython to list of alternate interpreters

New submission from Zach Valenta : Referring to the last paragraph of chapter 14 of the tutorial on interactive interpreters: https://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/interactive.html#alternatives-to-the-interactive-interpreter Despite personally using bpython, ptpython seems both mature and