[issue39292] syslog constants behind rfc

Change by Vinay Sajip : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed versions: -Python 3.7, Python 3.8 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39292] syslog constants behind rfc

Ryan added the comment: Thank you, this looks good. I'm pinned to 3.6 so while it won't work for me currently, maybe it will in a few years. For clarity and because I can't edit my original message, the RFC is 5424 (I had mistakenly said 5454 but you got it right). --

[issue39292] syslog constants behind rfc

Vinay Sajip added the comment: > can this issue be closed? Not quite yet. Waiting for feedback from the original reporter as to whether this change meets the requirements. I've also treated this as an enhancement rather than a bug, and so I am not currently planning to back-port these

[issue39292] syslog constants behind rfc

Batuhan added the comment: @vinay.sajip PR 17945 looks resolved this, can this issue be closed? -- nosy: +BTaskaya ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39292] syslog constants behind rfc

Vinay Sajip added the comment: New changeset ce54519aa09772f4173b8c17410ed77e403f3ebf by Vinay Sajip in branch 'master': bpo-39292: Add missing syslog facility codes. (GH-17945) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/ce54519aa09772f4173b8c17410ed77e403f3ebf --

[issue39292] syslog constants behind rfc

Change by Vinay Sajip : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +17353 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/17945 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39292] syslog constants behind rfc

Change by SilentGhost : -- type: -> behavior versions: -Python 2.7, Python 3.5, Python 3.6 ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue39292] syslog constants behind rfc

Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan : -- nosy: +vinay.sajip ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue39292] syslog constants behind rfc

New submission from Ryan : When using the SysLogHandler (https://docs.python.org/3/library/logging.handlers.html#logging.handlers.SysLogHandler) the supported facilities appear to be lagging the RFC (5454 ?), or at least what is being supported in other mainstream languages. I Specifically