Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
Closing as works for me.
--
resolution: - works for me
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3964
___
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
Isn't the usual way to use make -s if you don't want echoed commands?
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3964
Christian Höltje docw...@gerf.org added the comment:
Isn't 'make -s' a GNU make-ism?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3964
___
___
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
Well, at least -s is mentioned in my POSIX make(1p) manpage, and I found it in
an online version of the OpenBSD manpages.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3964
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Assuming the patch works (I don't do makefiles) would anyone use this yes or no?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3964
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
In my experience makes are generally pretty noisy, so I doubt it. But I don't
use freeze, so we'd really need a review from someone who does.
--
nosy: +r.david.murray
stage: - patch review
versions: +Python 3.2
New submission from Christian Höltje [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The make process for building a freeze'd python script is a little
noisy. This patch makes quieter unless someone adds VERBOSE=1 to the
make invocation.
--
components: Demos and Tools
files: freeze.quiet.patch
keywords: patch