[issue43783] Make ParamSpec.args/kwargs more useful objects

2021-04-10 Thread Guido van Rossum
Guido van Rossum added the comment: New changeset 522433601a5c64603dab3d733f41a5db39d237eb by Jelle Zijlstra in branch 'master': bpo-43783: Add ParamSpecArgs/Kwargs (GH-25298) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/522433601a5c64603dab3d733f41a5db39d237eb -- _

[issue43783] Make ParamSpec.args/kwargs more useful objects

2021-04-10 Thread Guido van Rossum
Change by Guido van Rossum : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue43783] Make ParamSpec.args/kwargs more useful objects

2021-04-09 Thread Ken Jin
Change by Ken Jin : -- nosy: +kj ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mail

[issue43783] Make ParamSpec.args/kwargs more useful objects

2021-04-08 Thread Jelle Zijlstra
Change by Jelle Zijlstra : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +24029 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/25298 ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue43783] Make ParamSpec.args/kwargs more useful objects

2021-04-08 Thread Jelle Zijlstra
Change by Jelle Zijlstra : -- assignee: -> Jelle Zijlstra ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: ht

[issue43783] Make ParamSpec.args/kwargs more useful objects

2021-04-08 Thread Jelle Zijlstra
New submission from Jelle Zijlstra : Currently, typing.ParamSpec.args and ParamSpec.kwargs are just object() instances, which makes them useless for runtime inspection of __annotations__. This type was introduced by PEP 612. Instead, I propose to make them return some special helper object wi