[issue5406] asyncore doc issue

2009-04-05 Thread Georg Brandl
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment: Closing as works for me. -- nosy: +georg.brandl resolution: - works for me status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue5406

[issue5406] asyncore doc issue

2009-03-09 Thread Josiah Carlson
Josiah Carlson josiahcarl...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment: Actually, that's exactly what it does. If the count is missing, it defaults to None. The code that is executed is exactly: if count is None: while map: poll_fun(timeout, map) It will loop until the

[issue5406] asyncore doc issue

2009-03-09 Thread Josiah Carlson
Josiah Carlson josiahcarl...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment: Well...the loop can also die if an uncaptured exception is raised, but I'm not sure that is necessary to spell out explicitly. -- message_count: 2.0 - 3.0 ___ Python tracker

[issue5406] asyncore doc issue

2009-03-09 Thread Giampaolo Rodola'
Giampaolo Rodola' billiej...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment: You're right, my fault. -- message_count: 3.0 - 4.0 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue5406 ___

[issue5406] asyncore doc issue

2009-03-02 Thread Giampaolo Rodola'
New submission from Giampaolo Rodola' billiej...@users.sourceforge.net: About asyncore.loop()'s count parameter: The count parameter defaults to None, resulting in the loop terminating only when all channels have been closed This is incorrect and it's not what count parameter actually does.