R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
Are you sure it isn't your Fedora installation that has the problem? My
understanding is that the linker name (the libxxx.so name) should exist
and be a symbolic link to the most recent soname (libxxx.N). So I think
distutils is doing
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
I agree with David. The .so name must exist; if it doesn't, your
installation does indeed lack the necessary prerequisite.
Closing as invalid.
--
nosy: +loewis
resolution: - invalid
status: open - closed
New submission from Jim Garrison jgarri...@troux.com:
Trying to build 3.1a1 on Fedora 9, the following extensions get skipped
even though the requisite packages are installed
_dbm
_gdbm
_hashlib
_sqlite3
_ssl
bz2
