[issue6133] LOAD_CONST followed by LOAD_ATTR can be optimized to just be a LOAD_CONST

2014-06-19 Thread Mark Lawrence
Mark Lawrence added the comment: Given the last two comments can this be closed as won't fix? -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6133 ___

[issue6133] LOAD_CONST followed by LOAD_ATTR can be optimized to just be a LOAD_CONST

2014-06-19 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Changes by Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu: -- resolution: later - rejected stage: - resolved status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6133 ___

[issue6133] LOAD_CONST followed by LOAD_ATTR can be optimized to just be a LOAD_CONST

2010-09-01 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Raymond Hettinger rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment: This proposal hasn't gotten much love or support and I'm no longer interested in it. Aside from ''.join and '{}'.format, there doesn't seem to be many common cases, so there's no big win here. -- assignee:

[issue6133] LOAD_CONST followed by LOAD_ATTR can be optimized to just be a LOAD_CONST

2010-09-01 Thread Benjamin Peterson
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org added the comment: What's the point of '{}'.format() anyway given the format() builtin? -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6133

[issue6133] LOAD_CONST followed by LOAD_ATTR can be optimized to just be a LOAD_CONST

2010-04-02 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Changes by Raymond Hettinger rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net: -- priority: - low versions: -Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6133 ___

[issue6133] LOAD_CONST followed by LOAD_ATTR can be optimized to just be a LOAD_CONST

2009-08-21 Thread Demur Rumed
Changes by Demur Rumed junkm...@hotmail.com: -- title: LOAD_CONST followed by LOAD_ATTR can be optimized to justbe a LOAD_COST - LOAD_CONST followed by LOAD_ATTR can be optimized to just be a LOAD_CONST ___ Python tracker