[issue6141] missing first argument on subprocess.Popen w/ executable

2009-05-29 Thread Lie Ryan
New submission from Lie Ryan lie.1...@gmail.com: Following from http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.tutor/55576 import subprocess subprocess.Popen(['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'], executable='echo') subprocess.Popen object at 0x7fdf7bb2bd50 b c d instead of the (what I) expected result a b c d

[issue6141] missing first argument on subprocess.Popen w/ executable

2009-05-29 Thread R. David Murray
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment: The way it works is the way most programmers expect it to work, even though most get bitten by it more than once. So the behavior isn't going to change. I've attached a doc fix, but I'm not sure whether or not the 'diplay name' piece

[issue6141] missing first argument on subprocess.Popen w/ executable

2009-05-29 Thread Georg Brandl
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment: Patch looks good, just replace `ps` by :program:`ps` please. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6141 ___

[issue6141] missing first argument on subprocess.Popen w/ executable

2009-05-29 Thread R. David Murray
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment: Fixed in r73026, thanks. -- resolution: - fixed stage: - committed/rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6141