[issue6491] Improve --with-dbmliborder option

2010-01-01 Thread Benjamin Peterson
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org added the comment: Applied in r77215. -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson resolution: - accepted status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6491

[issue6491] Improve --with-dbmliborder option

2009-07-20 Thread djc
Changes by djc dirk...@ochtman.nl: -- nosy: +djc ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6491 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue6491] Improve --with-dbmliborder option

2009-07-15 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
New submission from Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com: --with-dbmliborder option doesn't allow to specify that no dbm modules are requested. It also doesn't affect Anthony Baxter's gdbm module. The attached patch allows to specify --with-dbmliborder= which should