Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Is it the same as #3976?
--
nosy: +pitrou
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6945
___
Armin Ronacher armin.ronac...@active-4.com added the comment:
Yes. Appears to be related.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6945
___
Armin Ronacher armin.ronac...@active-4.com added the comment:
Duplicate of #3976
--
resolution: - duplicate
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6945
___
Changes by Armin Ronacher armin.ronac...@active-4.com:
--
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6945
___
___
New submission from Armin Ronacher armin.ronac...@active-4.com:
Currently pprint does not work on dicts it cannot sort. Because in
Python 3 sorted(x.items()) is no longer guaranteed to work a new sorting
solution has to be found.
--
messages: 92862
nosy: aronacher
severity: normal
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
A simple fix is to use key=lambda x: (id(type(x)), x). However, that
obviously doesn't work with values of different, but orderable types.
At the moment, I don't see how the Python 2 sort could be implemented
without a cmp() argument to
