R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
Since boost has changed their code and no one else has reported a problem and
2.6 is now in bug fix only mode, I'm going to close this as out of date (sorry
I overlooked it for 2.6.5).
If anyone disagrees, let me know what we should
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org:
--
versions: +Python 2.7
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7183
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +pveloz
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7183
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Moriyoshi Koizumi mozo+pyt...@mozo.jp added the comment:
See my comment on issue #5890. I attached a patch to solve the
Boost.Python issue.
--
nosy: +moriyoshi
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7183
Barry A. Warsaw ba...@python.org added the comment:
Robert indicated later that this probably did /not/ affect Bazaar.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7183
___
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
I added some tests in test_property in my checkout and the __doc__
property is not, as far as I can tell, set read-only by the issue 5890 fix.
The error message referenced in the report is:
AttributeError: 'Boost.Python.StaticProperty'
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
That should have been 'instance's dict', not the subclass dict.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7183
___
Barry A. Warsaw ba...@python.org added the comment:
Thanks David, that's what I suspect too (that's its a problem with
extension types). Unless we get more information, I'm not inclined to
hold up the 2.6.4 release for this.
--
___
Python tracker
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
I'm not sure I understand, how do you create a read-only instance dict?
--
nosy: +pitrou
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7183
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
I'm not sure you do. I have no idea how Boost works, but the fact that
removing a Boost 'read-only' declaration circumvents the problem in at
least some cases argues that Boost is setting _something_ read-only.
--
Barry A. Warsaw ba...@python.org added the comment:
After discussion on python-dev, this will not block 2.6.4
--
priority: release blocker - high
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7183
New submission from Zooko O'Whielacronx zo...@zooko.com:
According to
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boost1.38/+bug/457688 ,
Python 2.6.3 stopped working for something that Python 2.6.2 worked for,
involving Boost.
Andrew Mitchell looked at the Python 2.6.3 release notes, saw
Barry A. Warsaw ba...@python.org added the comment:
I think this is caused by the fix for bug 5890 and isn't a regression.
--
nosy: +barry
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7183
Barry A. Warsaw ba...@python.org added the comment:
Apparently this affects more than just Boost. lifeless (Robert Collins)
tells me that __doc__ becoming readonly buggered some code of ours in
bzr too, IIRC.
He thinks it was in pure Python (i.e. not extension code). Does anybody
have a pure
14 matches
Mail list logo