Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
Ok, great. I'll add the PyInt_Check back in and commit the patch, then. I
just wanted to check that I wasn't missing something obvious. Thank you!
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
Applied in r77842 (trunk), r77843 (py3k).
--
resolution: - accepted
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7767
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
The proposed addition sounds entirely reasonable to me.
In your patch, is there a reason for leaving out the first PyInt_Check (compare
with PyLong_AsLongAndOverflow)?
--
___
Python tracker
Case Van Horsen cas...@gmail.com added the comment:
The missing PyInt_Check is a mistake. I probably thought I was working on a
py3k version.
Let me know if I should create a new patch or if I should create one for py3k.
Thanks for the review.
--
Changes by Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: - mark.dickinson
nosy: +mark.dickinson
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7767
___
New submission from Case Van Horsen cas...@gmail.com:
There are Long and LongLong variants for most of the C API functions that
work with PyLong. This patch adds a LongLong version of
PyLong_AsLongAndOverflow.
This function will be helpful on 64-bit Windows platforms to quickly get a
64-bit
Changes by Brian Curtin cur...@acm.org:
--
components: +Interpreter Core -Extension Modules
keywords: +needs review
priority: - normal
stage: - patch review
versions: +Python 3.2
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
