[issue8265] test_float fails on ARM Linux EABI with soft floating point

2010-09-02 Thread Matthias Klose
Matthias Klose d...@debian.org added the comment: I checked with gcc-4.4 from the 4.4 branch, and with a recent build from the trunk. The check fails with -O0, and succeeds with -O1 and higher. Is the testcode from r82957 really using the optimization flags? --

[issue8265] test_float fails on ARM Linux EABI with soft floating point

2010-07-19 Thread Mark Dickinson
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment: I notice (again) that these failures occur on the 2.6 and 3.1 buildslaves (where the debug build includes the -O2 compilation flag), but not the 2.7 or py3k buildslaves. So again this looks like a compiler optimization bug. This should

[issue8265] test_float fails on ARM Linux EABI with soft floating point

2010-07-18 Thread Mark Dickinson
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment: The test_float failure is still extant. Here's the output of gcc -v on this buildbot, for use in any gcc bug report: Using built-in specs. Target: arm-linux-gnueabi Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian 4.4.4-6'

[issue8265] test_float fails on ARM Linux EABI with soft floating point

2010-07-18 Thread Mark Dickinson
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment: Added some test code to the configure script in r82957; if the corresponding configure test fails, this snippet can be used in the gcc bug report. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue8265] test_float fails on ARM Linux EABI with soft floating point

2010-06-24 Thread David Kirkby
David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net added the comment: I'm seeing this failure on both Solaris 10 (SPARC processor) in 32-bit mode and OpenSolaris 06/2009 (Intel Xeon) in 64-bit mode using Python 2.6.4. So it is not just an ARM Linux issue. See

[issue8265] test_float fails on ARM Linux EABI with soft floating point

2010-06-24 Thread Mark Dickinson
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment: David, thanks for the report. This looks like a different issue to me, though. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8265 ___

[issue8265] test_float fails on ARM Linux EABI with soft floating point

2010-06-24 Thread Mark Dickinson
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment: New issue for the Solaris failure opened: issue 9069. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8265 ___

[issue8265] test_float fails on ARM Linux EABI with soft floating point

2010-04-18 Thread STINNER Victor
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com: -- nosy: +haypo ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8265 ___ ___

[issue8265] test_float fails on ARM Linux EABI with soft floating point

2010-04-02 Thread Mark Dickinson
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment: I made a couple of experimental checkins to the release26-maint branch (I didn't want to do a temporary checkin to the trunk with a release imminent): see r79560 (which didn't work :) and its fix in r79601. Results: MIN =

[issue8265] test_float fails on ARM Linux EABI with soft floating point

2010-04-01 Thread Mark Dickinson
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment: From the values in the report, float.fromhex is giving the correct value here, but MIN-3*TINY is somehow coming out incorrectly. Correct values (with Python 2.6, so old float repr; OS X 10.6.2): Python 2.6.5+ (release26-maint:79559:79560,

[issue8265] test_float fails on ARM Linux EABI with soft floating point

2010-03-30 Thread Matthias Klose
Matthias Klose d...@debian.org added the comment: the buildbot labeled ARM Linux 3.x is an ARM EABI as well, compiler defaults -march=armv7 -math=vfp -float-abi=softfp. The failing test_float test is an ARM EABI, armv4, ARM mode, soft floating point. I never did see the test_float test suceed