STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com added the comment:
test_gdb.py refers to test_gdb_sample.py instead of gdb_sample.py. Attached
patch fixes that.
But then I get new errors:
---
...
Verify the pretty-printing of unicode values ... ok
STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com added the comment:
Oops, my last message (msg103435) was for #8434, not this issue. Anyway, #8434
is a duplicate of #8279, it doesn't matter.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
New submission from Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
This doesn't happen in verbose mode, because stdout isn't checked:
$ ./python -m test.regrtest test_gdb_sample
test_gdb_sample
test test_gdb_sample produced unexpected output:
Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com added the comment:
Sorry about that.
test_gdb_sample.py is merely a sample script for use by test_gdb.py (see
issue 8032); it's not intended to do anything useful by itself (though it does
need a print invocation, since test_gdb.py uses a breakpoint in
Changes by Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com:
--
keywords: +buildbot
priority: - normal
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8281
___
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
I would probably be simplest to rename it so it doesn't have a test_ prefix.
Indeed. Otherwise it gets caught and executed by regrtest as part of the
standard test suite.
How about sample_for_test_gdb.py, or somesuch?
Shorter would be better
Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com added the comment:
gdb_sample.py as a name works for me. I don't have commit rights to SVN so I
can't perform the rename myself.
(Note that due to issue 8279 the file isn't actually used at the moment by
test_gdb.py so it should be safe to rename. I have a
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
(Note that due to issue 8279 the file isn't actually used at the moment
by test_gdb.py so it should be safe to rename. I have a patch attached
to that latter bug; I'll fix up the patch after that file is renamed).
Thank you, this is done in
