Changes by Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +ncoghlan
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8370
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
Thanks, fixed in r80082. The builtins rename happened in 3.0; there are no
version added or version changed marks for 3.0 in the docs, since we regard
it as a clean start.
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
Changes by Daniel Diniz aja...@gmail.com:
--
priority: - normal
stage: - patch review
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8370
___
___
New submission from Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.com:
The builtins module referenced in the Python 2.6 __import__ documentation
does not seem to exist in Python 2.6:
http://docs.python.org/library/functions.html#__import__
These should probably be changed to __builtin__:
Changes by Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: - georg.brandl
components: +Documentation
nosy: +georg.brandl
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8370
___
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
You’re right. This module name has been fixed in the 3.x branch (it used a
magic name without reason); when importlib was backported from 3.1 to 2.6, this
change must have been overlooked.
Are you willing to produce a patch?
Regards
Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.com added the comment:
Replaced builtins with __builtin__. Also inserted a missing the.
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file16870/_issue-8370-1.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks for the info and quick response. Then this should probably also be
applied to trunk (Python 2.7).
--
versions: +Python 2.7
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.com added the comment:
Would it make sense to put a New in version 3.1 at the top of this page:
http://docs.python.org/py3k/library/builtins.html
(perhaps also with a note explaining that the module replaces __builtin__). I
actually wasn't able to confirm
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
(perhaps also with a note explaining that the module replaces __builtin__)
People used to 2.x will know about the name change; people new to Python with
3.x (the happy ones!) will not this this information, except perhaps to
understand outdated
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
Your first patch seems good to me; wait for a core developer’s answer before
taking time to add notes about renamed modules everywhere.
Cheers
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
