[issue8792] Support Apache extensions to XML-RPC in xmlrpclib

2012-10-21 Thread Brian Quinlan
Brian Quinlan added the comment: I'm closing this since the filer hasn't specified exactly what they want. -- status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8792 ___

[issue8792] Support Apache extensions to XML-RPC in xmlrpclib

2010-11-18 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment: An addition: It was reported in #10425 that None values are incorrectly serialized as valuenil//value, instead of just nil/, or maybe {namespace prefix for extensions defined by Apache}:nil/. This is not incorrect, but follows the

[issue8792] Support Apache extensions to XML-RPC in xmlrpclib

2010-11-16 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: An addition: It was reported in #10425 that None values are incorrectly serialized as valuenil//value, instead of just nil/, or maybe {namespace prefix for extensions defined by Apache}:nil/. -- nosy: +Adam.Bielański, eric.araujo,

[issue8792] Support Apache extensions to XML-RPC in xmlrpclib

2010-11-16 Thread Adam Bielański
Adam Bielański abg...@gmail.com added the comment: To make example provided by Amaury complete I'll add that in order to support both ways you also need to replace xmlrpclib.dumps() with code from attached file. Changes to original xmlrpclib.dumps() function are outlined with comments. In

[issue8792] Support Apache extensions to XML-RPC in xmlrpclib

2010-10-02 Thread Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc amaur...@gmail.com added the comment: It's easy enough to subclass the Transport type and add custom types to the dispatcher object, see the script below. Attila, Bhargav, is this solution acceptable to you? from xmlrpclib import Transport, ServerProxy class

[issue8792] Support Apache extensions to XML-RPC in xmlrpclib

2010-07-24 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment: I just noticed that I only need to strip the comma from the URL. So I now see it's not an Apache bug, but explicitly marked as an extension. So I'm reclassifying this as a feature request. As a new feature, it can only go into 3.2.

[issue8792] Support Apache extensions to XML-RPC in xmlrpclib

2010-07-24 Thread Bhargav
Bhargav bhar...@bluejeansnet.com added the comment: What I do is not a possible solution, because some other machine might add e:nil, what we need is XML namespace parsing. Also I can't really use my solution, as it makes my client non-portable, I cant move it from my dev machine to

[issue8792] Support Apache extensions to XML-RPC in xmlrpclib

2010-07-24 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment: Adding it to 2.7 is really out of the question. Assuming somebody would implement (which might not happen in the next three years or so), it can only go into 3.x, so you'ld have to port your code to 3.x to use it. --