Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
I decided that the alternate addition in #13557 is enough.
--
resolution: -> out of date
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
versions: -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
Should this be closed as a duplicate of issue #13557?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8824
___
Changes by Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com:
--
resolution: - duplicate
status: open - closed
superseder: - exec of list comprehension fails on NameError
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8824
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
I suggested more change here than I committed in #13557. I would like to think
about the extra a bit more. The issue about def in exec just came up again on
python-list, but I do not really like the third sentence I suggested.
--
assignee: docs@python
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
Okay; sorry about that. Reopening.
--
resolution: duplicate -
status: closed - open
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8824
___
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +mark.dickinson
type: - enhancement
versions: +Python 3.4 -Python 3.1
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8824
___
Changes by Jordan Stadler jordan.stad...@gmail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file21961/exec_doc_touchup_3_x.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8824
___
Changes by Jordan Stadler jordan.stad...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21981/exec_doc_touchup_3.x.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8824
___
Changes by Jordan Stadler jordan.stad...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21982/exec_doc_touchup_2.x.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8824
___
Jordan Stadler jordan.stad...@gmail.com added the comment:
I've updated the 3.x patch, should be correct now.
I also updated the 2.x patch to use ``in``. :keyword:`in` was used in an
earlier part of the paragraph I modified, so I have changed both for
consistency.
This is the paragraph
Changes by Jordan Stadler jordan.stad...@gmail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file21960/exec_doc_touchup_2_x.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8824
___
Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment:
In 3.x exec is a function, so the reference to 'in' should be removed/updated.
On 2.x it might be better to just use ``in`` instead of :keyword:`in`, because
the latter probably links to the 'in' operator that checks for containment.
Jordan Stadler jordan.stad...@gmail.com added the comment:
I'm going to update the documentation to include the scope information. Should
be done within a day.
--
nosy: +jstadler
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Jordan Stadler jordan.stad...@gmail.com:
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21960/exec_doc_touchup_2_x.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8824
Changes by Jordan Stadler jordan.stad...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21961/exec_doc_touchup_3_x.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8824
___
Jordan Stadler jordan.stad...@gmail.com added the comment:
Patches for 2.x and 3.x documentation related to 'exec'.
2.x
Provides more information about scopes when using additional expressions
for 'exec'. 2.x documentation for 'exec' is found in
reference/simple_stmts.
3.x
Provides more
Changes by R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com:
--
nosy: +r.david.murray
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8824
___
___
New submission from Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu:
This doc improvement suggestion is inspired by #991196 (and subsequent
duplicates) and the current discussion on py-dev in the thread
'variable name resolution in exec is incorrect'
(which is not a correct claim). I believe there is
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
To be super-clear, consider adding one more sentence, something like
The result for code with def statements or lambda expressions may be different
than it would be if the implied context were a function rather than a class.
--
Changes by Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +ncoghlan
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8824
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
20 matches
Mail list logo
