[issue9261] include higher (../../) dirs fails

2010-09-07 Thread Éric Araujo
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org: -- status: closed - open ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9261 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue9261] include higher (../../) dirs fails

2010-08-10 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: I think disallowing .. is fine, so I’m assigning to myself to make sure I’ll take time later to check the docs. -- assignee: tarek - merwok ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue9261] include higher (../../) dirs fails

2010-07-14 Thread Dan OD
New submission from Dan OD dj...@cam.ac.uk: MANIFEST.in example: recursive-include ../../this *.that fails to include files with warning: no files found matching '*.that' under directory '../../this' and also include ../../this *.that fails with warning: no files found matching

[issue9261] include higher (../../) dirs fails

2010-07-14 Thread Dan OD
Dan OD dj...@cam.ac.uk added the comment: Thinking about this - maybe including dirs above ./ is bad as it's not obvious where they should live in the sdist. My alternative would be to create links to ../../this in ./ but then distutils creates links rather than hard copies in sdist - is

[issue9261] include higher (../../) dirs fails

2010-07-14 Thread Dan OD
Dan OD dj...@cam.ac.uk added the comment: Sorry for all the noise - this dynamic link thing seems to be fixed in 2.7 rendering this report 'closed' Dan -- status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue9261] include higher (../../) dirs fails

2010-07-14 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: Can you tell if the docs fail to mention that? If they do, please reopen this as a documentation bug (change title, select component Documentation, and set status to open). Thank you! -- nosy: +merwok