Changes by Georg Brandl:
--
resolution: - duplicate
status: open - closed
superseder: - urllib* 20x responses not OK?
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue971965
Georg Brandl added the comment:
IMO the patch is not complete, the xview method should rather be
implemented like these in Tkinter.py.
Assigning to Martin.
--
assignee: - loewis
nosy: +georg.brandl, loewis
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Georg Brandl added the comment:
Fixed in rev. 58204, 58205 (2.5).
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1169
__
Sean Reifschneider added the comment:
Ported code change to urllib, passes tests, committed as revision 58206
--
resolution: - accepted
status: open - closed
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1177
Georg Brandl added the comment:
This might need at least a NEWS entry, if not a documentation clarification.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1177
__
Sean Reifschneider added the comment:
Georg: This has been assigned to you, do you have any thoughts on this?
If you don't, please assign back to me.
--
keywords: +py3k
nosy: +jafo
_
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1541463
Sean Reifschneider added the comment:
Facundo, can you do a NEWS update on this?
--
assignee: - facundobatista
keywords: +patch
status: closed - open
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1177
__
Georg Brandl added the comment:
Thanks for notifying me. The tracker currently doesn't send
notifications if you only set the assignee, but don't include a message.
I hope this will be fixed soon.
The __nonzero__() is unproblematic. The keys() produced in this way will
have an unpredictable
Sean Reifschneider added the comment:
Thanks for correcting my mis-click on the patch item, gbot.
As far as the order goes, is this something that needs to be discussed
on c.l.p, or should we assign it to someone else who might have an
opinion on it?
_
Hirokazu Yamamoto
added the comment:
OK, how about this patch? I extracted [xy]view{,_moveto,_scroll}
as mixin class [XY]View, and included them. It seems working.
__
Tracker [EMAIL
Facundo Batista added the comment:
Done, rev 58207.
--
resolution: accepted - fixed
status: open - closed
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1177
__
___
Bob Kline added the comment:
Please note that the documentation of the keys() method of the
FieldStorage class (both in the method's docstring as well as in the
separate library manual) describes the method as a dictionary style
keys() method. Section 3.8 of the documentation has this to say
Georg Brandl added the comment:
While this is true, there may be code relying on the current behavior,
and to break that for a tiny performance gain is gratuitous breakage and
should be avoided.
_
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1541463
Bob Kline added the comment:
I'm not sure I would characterize a speedup of several orders of
magnitude a tiny performance gain. We had scripts with very large
numbers of fields which were actually timing out. While I understand
and agree with the principle of breaking as little existing code
Guido van Rossum added the comment:
Cartman, please refrain from using vulgarities in your sample code. It's
hard to take a bug report seriously with such variable names.
--
nosy: +gvanrossum
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1179
Guido van Rossum added the comment:
readline() goes through C stdio which makes it impossible to get
non-blocking I/O right. You should be using raw os.read() calls (until
python 3000 which will remove Python's reliance on C stdio).
--
nosy: +gvanrossum
resolution: - wont fix
status:
Facundo Batista added the comment:
Applied the patchs long_hash.patch (rev 58208) and decimal_hash_v2.patch
(rev 58211)
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
_
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1772851
Changes by Michael Hoffman:
--
components: Distutils
severity: normal
status: open
title: Option to ignore ~/.pydistutils.cfg
type: rfe
versions: Python 2.6
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1180
__
Changes by Michael Hoffman:
--
title: Option to ignore ~/.pydistutils.cfg - Option to ignore or substitute
~/.pydistutils.cfg
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1180
__
Changes by Sean Reifschneider:
--
priority: - normal
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1180
__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Sean Reifschneider added the comment:
Guido: That code came from the full-disclosure list posting, I think
cartman was just passing it on.
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1179
__
Michael Hoffman added the comment:
Agree with isandler. This is not a bug.
--
nosy: +hoffman
_
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1643369
_
___
New submission from Michael Hoffman:
It would be useful if setup.py instances had an option to ignore
~/.pydistutils.cfg or substitute it with another file. For example, this
would be highly useful to people who maintain a system site-packages
directory along with one in their own home
James Antill added the comment:
So I think this is all the places integer overflow checking is needed
in imageop.c and rbgimgmodule.c.
There might be checks here which can't be exploited anyway, and I
haven't checked any other files yet.
Feel free to comment.
Ps. This is against the 2.5 in
Changes by James Antill:
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1179
__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
New submission from Martin Horcicka:
This patch makes os.environ.clear() to have the same effect as:
for name in os.environ.keys():
del os.environ[name]
I believe that most people expect the effects to be the same anyway.
The practical benefit is a simpler redefinition of the whole
Ismail Donmez added the comment:
Guido,
The poc is taken as is, sorry.
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1179
__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Sean Reifschneider:
--
keywords: +patch
priority: - normal
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1181
__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Ismail Donmez added the comment:
nevyn: Your patch cleanly applies to python 2.4.4 and fixes the
interpreter crash with poc.py
Thanks.
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1179
__
Guido van Rossum added the comment:
Hm. First of all, it seems the imageop module has completely missed the
Py_ssize_t changes.
Second, I don't think that if ( x != len / y ) is a valid replacement
for if ( x*y != len ) -- consider x==5, y==2, len==11.
--
priority: high -
James Antill added the comment:
Guido: It's true that that len can be slightly bigger than x*y, the big
thing is that it can't be smaller so we can malloc(len) and use upto x*y
(which was my main focus).
I first looked at any of this code today, but I didn't see any reason
that having len be
Changes by
Reinhard Speyerer
:
_
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1053365
_
___
Changes by Brett Cannon:
--
keywords: +patch
_
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1023290
_
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
33 matches
Mail list logo
