Sjoerd Mullender [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I'm sure you meant 2^32-2 ;-).
The fix to use long doesn't seem right to me either. unsigned int is
a better match with uid_t and gid_t.
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
The patch doesn't apply cleanly to the 2.5 branch, because that doesn't
have r61290. If somebody wants to backport it, go ahead (if you can do
so by Thursday).
--
nosy: +loewis
___
Python tracker
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Does it need to be backported to 2.5? IMO it is a corner case.
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4589
___
Changes by Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
assignee: - ncoghlan
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4512
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
More seriously, if cmp were to go into the standard library somewhere,
perhaps Raymond's class decorator (for filling in missing rich
comparisons) could go into the same place?
___
Python tracker [EMAIL
New submission from Robert Luce [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Consider the library 'c_lib.so' consisting of a single function 'c_func'
int c_func ( double *arg0, double *arg1, double *arg2, double *arg3,
double *arg4, double *arg5, double *arg6) {
printf(Value of arg0 is %p\n, arg0);
Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Moving cmp() somewhere other than builtins is not progress. IMO, it
needs to die off and the concept of it needs to disappear completely.
Code is better without it. Three-way comparisons are PITA to use --
their only virtue is as an
Marc-Andre Lemburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
On 2008-12-09 10:59, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Moving cmp() somewhere other than builtins is not progress. IMO, it
needs to die off and the concept of it needs to disappear
STINNER Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Hum, there is not fixer for 2to3. But I might be hard to write such
fixer because walk() generates (dirpath, dirnames, filenames) instead
of (dirpath, filenames).
Python2 prototype:
os.path.walk(path, visit, arg) - None
with visit:
Changes by STINNER Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file11988/numbits-3.patch
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3439
___
Senthil [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I verified this bug in the Py3.0 and Py3.1. Shall come out with a patch
for it.
--
nosy: +orsenthil
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4608
New submission from Peter Saunders [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Feature Request:
Could configure etc be modified to detect if it can use
enable_extended_FILE_stdio() to allow solaris to use 256 FD's while
still be compiled 32 bit. This is a new feature in Solaris 10 (came in
Update 4).
Some futher
Changes by Peter Saunders [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
components: +Distutils -Interpreter Core
type: - feature request
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4609
___
Changes by Peter Saunders [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
components: +Interpreter Core -Distutils
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4609
___
___
STINNER Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
It looks like the bug is already fixed in Python trunk:
def uuid4():
Generate a random UUID.
# When the system provides a version-4 UUID generator, use it.
if _uuid_generate_random:
_buffer =
STINNER Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
float(295147905179352891391L) gives different result on Python 2.5 and
Python 2.6:
- 2.9514790517935289e+20 # Python 2.5.1
- 2.9514790517935283e+20 # 2.7a0
whereas the code is the same!?
___
Python
STINNER Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
New version of my patch using a method instead of a property.
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12302/numbits-5.patch
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3439
New submission from Jakub Wilk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
$ cat urltest2.5
#!/usr/bin/python2.5
from urllib2 import urlopen
for line in urlopen('http://python.org/'):
print line
break
$ ./urltest2.5
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN
Changes by STINNER Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file11990/numbits-4.patch
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3439
___
STINNER Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Jul 31 2008, 23:17:40)
reduce(lambda x,y: x*32768.0 + y, [256, 0, 0, 1, 32767])
2.9514790517935283e+20
float(295147905179352891391L)
2.9514790517935289e+20
Python 2.7a0 (trunk:67679M, Dec 9 2008, 14:29:12)
John Stracke [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
The OPT env var is good. Maybe it could be documented in configure --help?
And, yeah, recognizing the platform is messy. I'll dig and see whether
gcc3 does the same thing on x86, though; if so, some logic to say use
-O2 for gcc 4 shouldn't be
Oops. I didn't think it translate the code in addinfobase to the new
style of iterators.
Jeremy
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Senthil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Senthil [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I verified this bug in the Py3.0 and Py3.1. Shall come out with a patch
for it.
John Stracke [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
OK, nope, gcc 3.4.6 on x86-64 builds fine. So, please, just have
configure --help mention OPT.
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4594
___
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Please, can you provide a patch that does not change whitespace
everywhere? Even if these files use indentation inconsistently; the
patch will be smaller and much easier to proofread.
(I vaguely remember a document saying that it's
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
The patch is fine.
If it were me, I'd change os.walk to accept keyword-only arguments:
def walk(top, *, topdown=True, onerror=None, followlinks=False):
...
--
nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc
resolution: - accepted
Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Copy paste from python-dev post:
The problem with memoryview appears to be related to the way it
calculates its own length (since that is the check that is failing when
the view blows up):
a = array('i', range(10))
m = memoryview(a)
len(m)
STINNER Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
There is not only chown! There are also lchown(), fchown(), stat() and
lstat().
Attached patch:
- use unsigned int to store Windows st_uid/st_gid in the win32_stat
structure
- use PyLong to store an unsigned group in the stat result
New submission from Morten Bentsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The uuid module uses a single global buffer for storing random values
obtained from the system. This can (and does) cause non-uniqueness of
generated id's when using the uuid4 function in a multithreaded program.
The following snippet
STINNER Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I tested my patch (for Python trunk) on Ubuntu Gutsy with a 32 bits
CPU: chown(), lchwon(), fchown(), stat() and lstat() works as expected
(support identifier 2**31-1).
___
Python tracker [EMAIL
New submission from Alex Stapleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Following a discussion on reddit it seems that the unicode case
conversion algorithms are not being followed.
$ python3.0
Python 3.0rc1 (r30rc1:66499, Oct 10 2008, 02:33:36)
[GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5488)] on darwin
Type help,
Changes by David W. Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
nosy: +LambertDW
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4606
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
STINNER Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Ok, I understand why different versions of the same code gives
different results: compiler flags! Python 2.5.1 is my Ubuntu version
(should be compiled with -O3) whereas Python 2.7 and 3.1a0 are
compiled by me with -00.
Results with Python
Antoine Pitrou [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Sorry for the whitespace changes, here is a patch that has less of
them... hope that helps ;-S
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12303/issue4580ws.patch
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Antoine Pitrou [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
The idea was to have one implementation of the work-around (ab) - (ba)
instead of 10 or so instances of this snippet in the Python stdlib
and probably a few hundred places in other code.
But what use-case does it solve, except for making
Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Victor, what does
1e16 + 2.
give on your Ubuntu 2.5 machine?
(Humor me. :) )
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3166
___
Alexander Belopolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Just to add to the list of getsource quirks: with the following in x.py,
f = lambda: 0 \
[EOF]
import inspect, x; inspect.getsource(x.f)
Traceback (most recent call last):
..
tokenize.TokenError: ('EOF in multi-line statement', (2, 0))
Elizabeth Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
No, I don't have those set.
- Elizabeth
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4598
___
___
New submission from Kuba Kończyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Near the end of Reference Counting in Python section we have:
(...)The disadvantage of borrowing over leaking is(...), leaking
should be replaced by borrowing.
--
assignee: georg.brandl
components: Documentation
messages: 77425
nosy:
Kuba Kończyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I meant owning.
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4611
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
STINNER Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
About -O0 vs -O1, I think that I understood (by reading the
assembler).
pseudocode of the -O0 version:
while ()
{
load x from the stack
x = x * ... + ...
write x to the stack
}
pseudocode of the -O1 version:
while
STINNER Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
An interresting document: Request for Comments: Rounding in PHP
http://wiki.php.net/rfc/rounding
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3166
___
Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Intel uses 80 bits float in internals, but load/store uses 64 bits
float. Load/store looses least significant bits.
Exactly. If your Intel machine is Pentium 4 or newer, you can get
around this by using the SSE2 extensions, which work with
Alexander Belopolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
If your Intel machine is Pentium 4 or newer, you can get
around this by using the SSE2 extensions, which work with 64-bit doubles
throughout. I don't
Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
[Alexander]
The flags you may be looking for are -msse2 -mfpmath=sse
Thanks, Alexander!
[Alexander again, from an earlier post...]
I noticed that you replaced a call to _PyLong_AsScaledDouble with your
round to nearest algorithm. I
Alexander Belopolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
You convinced me. After all, if python interpreter does not complain
about missing end-of-line and processes the unterminated line, getsource
should report it.
Here is a patch that passes existing tests and adds a NoEOF test case.
I
Marc-Andre Lemburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
On 2008-12-09 16:06, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Antoine Pitrou [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
The idea was to have one implementation of the work-around (ab) - (ba)
instead of 10 or so instances of this snippet in the Python stdlib
Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
[Alexander]
I also wonder whether round to nearest float can be implemented
without
floating point arithmetics. I would think round towards zero should
be
a simple matter of extracting an appropriate number of bits from the
long and
Alexander Belopolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
..
The idea's attractive. The problem is finding an integer type that's
guaranteed to have enough bits to store the mantissa for the float
(probably plus one or two bits more for comfort); for IEEE 754 this
means a 64-bit integer
Changes by Gabriel Genellina [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
nosy: +gagenellina
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3166
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
As you say, performance would suffer.
What would using Python's integer type solve, that isn't already solved by
the patch?
I know the code isn't terribly readable; I'll add some comments
explaining clearly what's going on.
Changes by Gabriel Genellina [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
nosy: +gagenellina
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4566
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Alexander Belopolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
..
What would using Python's integer type solve, that isn't already solved by
the patch?
Speaking for myself, it would alleviate the irrational fear of
anything
Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Are you returning the module in your extension's init function? The
import machinery takes the returned module from the init function and
adds it to sys.modules for you.
--
nosy: +brett.cannon
___
Changes by Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
status: open - pending
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4612
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Antoine Pitrou [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Indeed, it seems to happen if you first call read() before calling close().
--
nosy: +pitrou
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4604
Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
By the way, the algorithm here is essentially the same as the algorithm that I
implemented for the float.fromhex method, except that the float.fromhex method
is more
complicated in that it may have to deal with signed zeros or subnormals.
blake madden [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Sorry, mate, that's all Greek to me--I'm a total noob with Python. I'm
simply trying to run the example in r67655 (the Extending Embedded
Python example) and it fails with 'emb' not being found. It appears
that calling
New submission from Albert Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Say I have module foo.py:
def a(x):
def b():
x
del x
If I run foo.py under Python 2.4.4 I get:
File foo.py, line 4
del x
SyntaxError: can not delete
Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Guido approved removing __builtin__.cmp() in 3.0.1. It was supposed to
have been taken out but was forgotten.
With respect to the DRY principle, I disagree about its utility here.
The code is so simple that it doesn't warrant cross-module
Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Because the init function for extension modules are supposed to return
the module now and the import machinery adds the module itself.
--
nosy: +brett.cannon
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skip Montanaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Here's a test case (diff against Lib/test/test_io.py). This fails for
me on OS X 10.5.5 with the tip of the py3k branch.
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12305/iobug.diff
Changes by Skip Montanaro [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
stage: test needed - needs patch
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4604
___
___
Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Ah, I had not looked at the issue; sorry about the confusion.
PyImport_Create() is doing what it is supposed to be doing and should
not call PyImport_AddModule(). The example is wrong.
Closing this as invalid since the example is off.
Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
You are probably looking at http://docs.python.org/3.0/ still and that
only updates when a new release happens. To see the in-development docs
look at http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/ .
And the problem with the docs and its new PyModule_Create()
blake madden [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
So, does that mean that Python is fine and there is a problem in the
example? How do I get that example to work, there seems to be something
missing in it. Thanks.
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skip Montanaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
fixed patch. I'm still a bit clumsy with the assertRaises stuff.
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12306/iobug.diff
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4604
Jean Brouwers [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
It looks like the patch did fix the problems. Attached are the results
for 32- and 64-bit Python 2.6.1 with and without the patch, all built with
SUN's compilers on Solaris 10 (Opteron).
The math log tests failed with the 32-bit build before
Changes by Jean Brouwers [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file12308/Python-2.6.1-64bit-Solaris10-math_patch.log
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3167
___
Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
The example is broken.
And the example under discussion is
http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/extending/embedding.html#extending-embedded-python
.
I have changed the title to be more descriptive and assigned to Martin
to find out what the proper
New submission from Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
PyModule_Create() is not documented (or at least it isn't showing up in
the C API index). Might be other parts of the new module initialization
API that are not documented either.
--
assignee: georg.brandl
components: Documentation
Skip Montanaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Here's a minimal patch to BufferedReader.read() which causes the test
to pass. I will leave it for smarter people to decided whether or not
all the other read() methods need the same test.
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12309/io.patch
Changes by Skip Montanaro [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file12305/iobug.diff
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4604
___
Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
The patch still gets the length of memory view objects wrong - it just
makes it *consistently* wrong so that the specific assignment being
tested appears to work.
Note the following behaviour with the current memoryview :
from array import
Changes by Skip Montanaro [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
stage: needs patch - patch review
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4604
___
___
blake madden [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
You are probably looking at http://docs.python.org/3.0/ still and that
only updates when a new release happens.
Didn't you just have a new release, Python 3? I thought the website
said it was a stable release? The production help for Python 3
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Does it need to be backported to 2.5? IMO it is a corner case.
Not necessarily. If nobody volunteers, it won't be backported,
which is fine with me. The only potential release blocker for
a bug fix release can be a regression, which this
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Brett:
You are probably looking at http://docs.python.org/3.0/ still and that
only updates when a new release happens.
That is not true, I want it to update continually, like the 2.6 ones,
and have already contacted Neal about it.
Blake:
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
OK, nope, gcc 3.4.6 on x86-64 builds fine. So, please, just have
configure --help mention OPT.
Can you contribute a patch? I'm skeptical it whether it is even possible
to influence the output of --help.
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I have known this problem for years, and decided not to act; I don't
consider it an important problem. Implementing it properly is
complicated by the fact that some of the case mappings are conditional
on the locale.
If you consider it
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Ok, then please run, in a cmd.exe shell, in the Python directory
python.exe Lib\idlelib\idle.py
and report its output.
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4598
Roumen Petrov [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
ok for patch
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4587
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
The proper way of extending embedded Python can be seen in
Demo/embed/demo.c.
I can't contribute to the documentation, so I'm unassigning myself.
--
assignee: loewis -
___
Python tracker [EMAIL
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
When python is embedded in a program, there must be a way for the
program to export
some of its functions to python - a module that resides in the main
executable.
You cannot use the import machinery to import such a module, because
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Unfortunately, it missed the deadlines (i.e. nobody checked it in in
time). I'll look into it.
--
assignee: - loewis
priority: normal - critical
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 14:34, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
When python is embedded in a program, there must be a way for the
program to export
some of its functions
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
OK. I'm currently writing a documentation patch for issue4592.
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4612
___
Skip Montanaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Thanks Roumen. Can I get a verdict on this approach from one of the
main Python developers? I'm thinking a better way to control this
would be to add a --flag to the build command to control the search
order.
--
assignee: -
Antoine Pitrou [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Hi Nick,
1. memoryview needs to be fixed so that internally self-view.len is
always the length in bytes, even after taking a slice of the view
This is in my patch, unless I'm missing something?
2. memoryview needs to be fixed so that
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
See attached documentation patch.
Instead of a direct call to PyModule_Create(), the main function must
use
PyImport_AppendInittab(emb, PyInit_emb);
Note that the same line also works for all 2.x versions.
I'll try to add an item
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Somehow you caught the only SyntaxError that forgets to add filename and
line information.
Patch attached, at the expense of not displaying the variable name (it
should be obvious if the line is displayed)
--
keywords: +needs
Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Thanks for your comments, Alexander.
Here's a rewritten version of the patch that's better commented and
somewhat less convoluted; I think it should be easier to verify the
correctness of this one.
Added file:
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Applied in r67682.
Please don't add things directly to cporting.rst, rather amend the
PortingExtensionModulesToPy3k wiki page.
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
- The patch corrects a specific case, but not others: for example if the
file is opened in r (text) mode.
There are also other methods to test: peek(), read1()...
- It should use
self._checkClosed()
which already raises the same
Skip Montanaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Amaury - It should use
Amauryself._checkClosed()
Amaury which already raises the same exception with the same message.
I think some other places will need this change then.
Note that I don't know the io code at all. I was just
New submission from Tom Pinckney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Any interest in an itertools de-duping function? I find I have to write
this over and over for different projects:
def deduped(iter,key=None):
keys = set()
for x in iter:
if key:
k = key(x)
else:
STINNER Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
New patch:
- limit memory footprint: use a static buffer to store the frames,
with a maximum of MAXDEPTH frames (default: MAXDEPTH=100)
- if there are more than MAXDEPTH frames, jump to the frame MAXDEPTH
on error (it's like a truncated
Changes by STINNER Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file11666/segfault-2.patch
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3999
___
STINNER Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Oh, another change in segfault-3.patch:
- disable signal handler before the first call to segfault_enter()
and the last call to segfault_exit()
About the memory footprint: it would be possible to use variable size
buffer using malloc() and
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
+1 compiler_error should be used anyway.
--
keywords: -needs review
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4613
Changes by Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
assignee: - rhettinger
nosy: +rhettinger
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4615
___
___
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
