Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
The 4th failure (test_endian_double) probably has nothing to do with
ctypes. See also issue #1762561.
--
nosy: +mark.dickinson
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Anand B Pillai abpil...@gmail.com added the comment:
The problem seems to be in the normalize_date function in
datetimemodule.c. It is checking for a valid year range, but not
checking for a valid month or day range.
I have a patch which fixes this problem. It checks for month range
(1=m=12)
Mancausoft b...@mancausoft.org added the comment:
Mark Dickinson rep...@bugs.python.org scrisse:
The 4th failure (test_endian_double) probably has nothing to do with
ctypes. See also issue #1762561.
I try to use the patch arm-float2.diff, but test result is the same:
Changes by Galen Clark Haynes gchay...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +robotify
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6729
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
I think Greg's patch looks fine, modulo updating it to apply cleanly to
py3k.
I couldn't resist tinkering a bit, though: factoring out the complement
operations (for a, b and z) into a separate function gives (IMO) cleaner
and more direct
Domen ielect...@gmail.com added the comment:
What about AUTH SSL? Or is it too-deprecated?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2054
___
New submission from Zooko O'Whielacronx zo...@zooko.com:
This command:
python setup.py --verbose darcsver
works as expected -- the presence of '--verbose' increases the verbosity
of logging.
This command:
python setup.py darcsver --verbose
does not increase the verbosity, nor does it tell
Derk Drukker derk.druk...@gmail.com added the comment:
More elegant than using quotes in the cmdline string is, IMO, passing a
sequence to subprocess.Popen instead. I've put a new patch up for
review: http://codereview.appspot.com/141050
I've also unified the Unix and Windows portions in
New submission from Georg Brandl ge...@python.org:
Currently, ``map(None, a)`` is recognized and converted to ``list(a)``
which is correct but quite useless.
``map(None, a, b, ...)`` is not treated specially. An approximate
translation would be ``map(lambda *xs: xs, a, b, ...)`` which however
Changes by Florian Mayer florma...@aim.com:
--
nosy: +segfaulthunter
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7203
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Florian Mayer florma...@aim.com added the comment:
A full fix would be
list(map(fun, *zip(*itertools.zip_longest(a, b, ...
and if fun is None
list(map(lambda *xs: xs, *zip(*itertools.zip_longest(a, b, ...
--
___
Python tracker
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
Mark, if you want to get reviews, it might be useful to upload the patch
to Rietveld (as the diff is difficult to read). However, I would trust
you to get it right, anyway, so feel free to go ahead and apply it.
--
New submission from Thomas Klausner t...@giga.or.at:
In Python-2.6.3, test_pep263.py starts with the following line:
#! -*- coding: koi8-r -*-
When this is executed by a shell, it looks for the interpreter -*-.
I guess the '!' is superfluous there, or it should be something like
#! /usr/bin/env
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
This has already been fixed in r69619.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: - out of date
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7204
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
Hmm. Okay, I take it back then. :) Sorry for the noise.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7201
___
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
Applied in r75697 (trunk) and r75698 (py3k).
--
resolution: - accepted
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1087418
New submission from Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net:
There is a systemic bug in BZ2File where the GIL is released to perform
compression work, and any other thread calling into BZ2File will
deadlock. We noticed in the write method, but inspection of the code
makes it clear that its
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Thanks, nice catch.
--
nosy: +pitrou
priority: - high
stage: - needs patch
versions: +Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net added the comment:
On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 22:00 +, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Thanks, nice catch.
Yeah :).
versions: +Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2
Python 2.5 is also affected - its
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Python 2.5 is also affected - its what we're running on the server that
broke :)
Yes, but it doesn't receive any bug fixes anymore -- only security
fixes.
--
___
Python tracker
Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net added the comment:
On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 22:27 +, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Python 2.5 is also affected - its what we're running on the server that
broke :)
Yes, but it doesn't receive any bug
New submission from Rich Healey ri...@psych0tik.net:
64 bit pythons fail on 64 bit Windows 7.
The crash happens with python 2.6 and 3.1 in 64 bit mode. 3.1 was a
clean install after the issue presented itself.
I'm not 100% sure how best to help with the problem, I've attached the
dump from
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
What is LuaPriv in that log? Something you installed?
(sorry, not a Windows specialist)
--
nosy: +pitrou
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7206
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
components: +Build, Windows
priority: - critical
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7206
___
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
I think Antoine's suggestion is reasonable, and that we should apply the
patch to stop the buildbots from failing, but leave this issue open
until someone with more xmlrpc knowledge can respond to Nick and
Antoine's questions.
--
Jason R. Coombs jar...@jaraco.com added the comment:
This new version of the patch provides a workaround for the issue1686475
regression. It simply falls back to the traditional (symlink-naive) stat
behavior when a handle cannot be obtained for the specified filename.
My intention is that we
Rich Healey ri...@psych0tik.net added the comment:
I'm not 100% sure.
I have a x64 machine running Windows 2008. I will check if it's in the
log now.
I will also check if it's in the debug trace for x86 python (which works).
RESULTS:
I get the LuaPriv initialised line on x86 python on my
Rich Healey ri...@psych0tik.net added the comment:
I think that dump may be incorrect because it does not have all the
symbols. I will checkout source for latest 3.x trunk and attempt to
build 64 bit binaries.
--
___
Python tracker
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
What kind of action has triggered that crash?
--
nosy: +loewis
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7206
___
Changes by Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file14009/windows symlink draft 1.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1578269
___
Changes by Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file14039/windows symlink draft 2.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1578269
___
Changes by Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file14050/windows symlink draft 3.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1578269
___
Changes by Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file14130/windows symlink draft 4.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1578269
___
Changes by Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file14195/windows symlink draft 5.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1578269
___
Changes by Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file14206/windows symlink draft 6.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1578269
___
Changes by Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file14837/python-core_rev4274.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1578269
___
Changes by Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file14838/python-core_rev4275.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1578269
___
Changes by Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file14840/windows symlink draft 7.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1578269
___
Changes by Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file14877/windows symlink draft 8.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1578269
___
Changes by Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file14878/windows symlink draft 9.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1578269
___
Changes by Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file15100/windows symlink draft 10.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1578269
___
Rich Healey ri...@psych0tik.net added the comment:
No action- the interpreter fails to start.
Or do you mean what changed to make it break? I'm not sure. It used to
work but I don't believe I changed anything on my system.
--
___
Python tracker
42 matches
Mail list logo
