Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
Thank you for catching and fixing this.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11621
___
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
I would still favour committing the semaphore-based version first
(especially in 3.2), and then discussing performance improvements if
desired.
For 3.2, I would prefer a solution that makes least changes to the
current code. This is
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
Would you like to work on a patch?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11624
___
___
Andreas Stührk andy-pyt...@hammerhartes.de added the comment:
Attached is a patch. I'm not too happy about the error message though, I think
it's more confusing than helpful.
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21328/issue11627.patch
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
I realize that this is
a subtle point, but in fact, the atomic functions make no memory
barrier guarantees either (I think).
No need to guess:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms683560(v=vs.85).aspx
This function generates a full
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
I don’t really follow what you’re saying, sorry. Anyway, it looks like a
feature request separate from this bug, let’s keep things distinct :)
You can write to the ML, add a todo entry or another bug about your other thing.
--
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Le lundi 21 mars 2011 à 22:57 +, Andreas Stührk a écrit :
Andreas Stührk andy-pyt...@hammerhartes.de added the comment:
Attached is a patch. I'm not too happy about the error message though,
I think it's more confusing than helpful.
You
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
It seems this function was forgotten. I'd add this for 3.2.1, which of course
means that your extension wouldn't run on a 3.2.0 installation. Would you
consider this acceptable?
Would you prefer to see a compiler error indicating that you
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
Looks great, thank you. I think I’ll also add a docstring to main before
committing, now that the function is publicly documented.
Did you have to manually click “Create Patch” to make roundup generate it? Did
you try first to click on the
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org:
--
nosy: +eric.araujo
versions: -Python 3.1, Python 3.4
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11628
___
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
Thanks for the report. Can you try to reproduce the bug with a distutils setup
script to confirm the bug and get an error log? You may have to apply the
patch from #11599 to get a complete error message. (Also, superuser rights are
not
Carl Meyer c...@dirtcircle.com added the comment:
Did you have to manually click “Create Patch” to make roundup generate it?
Yes - the first time too.
Did you try first to click on the button of the existing repo before adding a
new repo entry?
That would probably have worked fine. The
Roundup Robot devnull@devnull added the comment:
New changeset d3ae3fe3eb97 by Victor Stinner in branch 'default':
Issue #7330, #10833: Replace %100s by %.100s and %200s by %.200s
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/d3ae3fe3eb97
--
nosy: +python-dev
___
Roundup Robot devnull@devnull added the comment:
New changeset 15f9eca5e956 by Victor Stinner in branch 'default':
Issue #3080: On DJGPP, case_bytes() returns -1 to signal an error if the file
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/15f9eca5e956
--
___
Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com added the comment:
I think this is a good idea.
Am not sure whether it should be backported though.
--
assignee: - rhettinger
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11628
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
Right, I edited the versions field to match the versions that contain
cmp_to_key, but if this behavior change is just for performance, it’s not a
candidate for backport.
Chris: I’d go with the simpler implementation.
--
versions:
Roundup Robot devnull@devnull added the comment:
New changeset 97799a54728e by Raymond Hettinger in branch '3.2':
Issue #11628: cmp_to_key should use __slots__.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/97799a54728e
New changeset 2e5e5d515c09 by Raymond Hettinger in branch 'default':
Issue #11628:
Changes by Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com:
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11628
___
Chris Colbert sccolb...@gmail.com added the comment:
Man, you guys are quick! Cheers!
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11628
___
Andreas Stührk andy-pyt...@hammerhartes.de added the comment:
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
You could try something more explicit, such as
calling %s() should have returned an instance of BaseException, not %s
% (type, Py_TYPE(value))
Thanks, updated the patch.
By the
Changes by Andreas Stührk andy-pyt...@hammerhartes.de:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21329/issue11627_2.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11627
___
STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com added the comment:
Ok, good idea, I will do that. I think that I will write it in the
function comment, something like: This function is signal safe.
Done in 6685691dfcbd3644feffcb197491bce3168ff5de (git SHA-1)
While checking the usage of signal
Jeff McNeil j...@jmcneil.net added the comment:
Just wanted to check so this doesn't sit with people waiting on me. Is there
anything else I need/should do to this patch? Little unclear on how to handle
the deprecation process.
--
___
Python
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
No, it is not waiting for you, in fact it is waiting for me to commit
the portion which you have already contributed with some additional
code (DeprecationWarning).
But this bug does not end up here as there are other primitives which
may
Ned Deily n...@acm.org added the comment:
The release of Xcode 4 for Mac OS X 10.6 has complicated things for Python
builds. We need to sort out what the problems are and possible solutions for
them. I suggest this issue be reassigned to Ronald and me.
In the meantime, the workaround is to
Changes by Brett Cannon br...@python.org:
--
assignee: eric.araujo - brett.cannon
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11591
___
___
STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com added the comment:
I renamed some functions to conform to the PEP 8 (and have more readable
function names). I prefer to do it today instead having to keep ugly names for
years :-)
Functions are now:
* enable(file=sys.stderr, all_threads=False)
*
STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com added the comment:
It would be nice if it were enabled by default for fatal errors
(and asserts perhaps?).
That would mean that the module should be a builtin module, or that it is
always loaded in memory.
I am maybe ok to enable it by default for
Changes by Andreas Stührk andy-pyt...@hammerhartes.de:
--
nosy: +Trundle
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11393
___
___
Changes by Brett Cannon br...@python.org:
--
assignee: - brett.cannon
components: +Demos and Tools
stage: - patch review
versions: +Python 3.3
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11561
101 - 130 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
