bruno Piguet bruno.pig...@gmail.com added the comment:
Do you agree that the attached patch could be a practical solution ?
The patch is for the 2.6 version of the lib. Transposition to other versions
should be trivial.
If we don't want to break backward compatibility, the solution is to add a
Hynek Schlawack h...@ox.cx added the comment:
Anyone?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10053
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Hynek Schlawack h...@ox.cx added the comment:
Martin, are you still committed to this? I still think code duplication is bad
(especially for security related code) but I’d be willing to write a fwalk-less
version so it doesn’t look like I’m just defending my code here.
--
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
Martin, are you still committed to this?
Yes, I'll provide a patch RSN. I doubt that there will be that much code
duplication.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Abhishek Singh abhishekrsi...@gmail.com added the comment:
I have a pretty complicated setup. 100's of threads, xmlrpc being in the main
thread and providing show routines for my program. I have 10's of such
processes doing some heavy duty simulation/crunching.
The threads and program is in
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
Thanks for the patch.
I think the extra check should be done unconditionally in the case where we've
looked up the default .netrc file. Adding a feature to 3.3 to provide an
optional check for other files (with default False) would
Ramchandra Apte maniandra...@gmail.com added the comment:
Its not a bug though it has maintenance problems because if you change manual
is False to not manual it no longer works correctly.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Michael Foord mich...@voidspace.org.uk added the comment:
Patch looks great - thanks David.
--
assignee: docs@python - michael.foord
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14971
___
New submission from mattip matti.pi...@gmail.com:
These are changes necessary to mailbox.py and its tests so that tests pass
(windows platform) on pypy 1.9.0. Files must be explicitly closed on pypy.
I would like to submit these as a compatability issue type, but that category
does not
Vinay Sajip vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
it has maintenance problems because if you change manual is False
to not manual it no longer works correctly.
So you should probably comment the initialisation appropriately.
--
___
Python
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
I see some code changes, but no added tests for those code changes.
msg.fp doesn't exist in Python3. I'd like to understand those changes better,
but I don't know when I'll have the time or if it is worth the effort.
--
nosy:
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
Oh, and the code changes should presumably be applied to Python3 as well (once
there are tests), so I've added those versions. It might be better to have two
patches, one for the close of _file, and the other for the msg.fp stuff (since
New submission from Daniel Swanson popcorn.tomato.d...@gmail.com:
I was looking for information about menus in tkinter and checked the see also
list. The second is copyrighted 1999, the third says Python 2.5 and the first
is pretty much just links to the second and third. The forth is a book.
Changes by Daniel Swanson popcorn.tomato.d...@gmail.com:
--
title: tkinter see also list is from Python2 - tkinter documentation see
also list in Python3 is from Python2
type: - enhancement
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
Thanks for the report. Are you interested in making a patch? Also, could you
tell if the bug happens in 3.2?
--
nosy: +eric.araujo
stage: - needs patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org:
--
assignee: docs@python -
components: +Library (Lib) -Documentation
nosy: -docs@python
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14680
___
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
Text LGTM; I haven’t looked at the position in the doc file though. Sandro,
once again I’m adding you to nosy in the hope that you’ll have time to make a
review and maybe a commit, with my thanks!
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
Please also take my note about pipes.quote in my OP into account.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14616
___
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file25870/ac776ef41428.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14843
___
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
OK. Can you paste the full traceback for the error?
--
stage: - needs patch
title: os.rename should not be used - Use shutil.move instead of os.rename in
packaging
___
Python tracker
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file25870/ac776ef41428.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14843
___
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
Looks like the diff generator can’t be used for not up-to-date clones. Could
you update a diff?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14843
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
What is the use case for passing a string subclass to charmap_decode? Or in
other words, how did you stumble upon the bug?
--
nosy: +eric.araujo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org:
--
keywords: +easy
nosy: +sandro.tosi
stage: - needs patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14927
___
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
Sandro: I added 2.7 to indicate it should be checked too. As you said, the bug
wasn’t there, because there is no In-place Operators section (which I think
there should be, i.e. backporting #9717 (if you do that, please use a full
commit
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
The type is available as types.SimpleNamespace
(sorry for being OT) Is this documented in whatsnew? Also, I remember a
discussion about making it public or not, but don’t recall a decision. I
personally find it bad that we have structseqs
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
I fail to see the problem here. If the module has 'from __future__ import
unicode_literals, then the docstring output clauses would need to be changed
to reflect the fact that the input literals are now unicode. What am I missing?
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
Since there's been no response, I'm closing this.
--
keywords: +buildbot
nosy: +r.david.murray
resolution: - out of date
stage: - committed/rejected
status: pending - closed
___
Python
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
Closing because of lack of response.
--
nosy: +r.david.murray
status: pending - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6165
Changes by R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com:
--
status: pending - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9722
___
___
30 matches
Mail list logo
