Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
keywords: +easy
nosy: +ezio.melotti
stage: - test needed
type: crash - behavior
versions: +Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15880
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15887
___
___
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
stage: needs patch - patch review
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15888
___
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: docs@python - ezio.melotti
nosy: +ezio.melotti
type: - enhancement
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15920
___
Chris Rebert added the comment:
Any reactions? The patch is pretty straightforward...
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14570
___
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +petri.lehtinen
stage: needs patch - patch review
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14570
___
New submission from Jean-Paul Calderone:
Python 3.3.0rc2+ (default:9def2209a839, Sep 10 2012, 08:44:51)
[GCC 4.6.3] on linux
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
memoryview(b'foo') + b'bar'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
TypeError:
Stefan Krah added the comment:
What is the expected outcome? memoryviews can't be resized, so
this scenario isn't possible:
bytearray([1,2,3]) + b'123'
bytearray(b'\x01\x02\x03123')
--
nosy: +skrah
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Just prepend the empty bytestring if you want to make sure the result is a
bytes object:
b'' + memoryview(b'foo') + b'bar'
b'foobar'
I think the following limitation may be more annoying, though:
b''.join([memoryview(b'foo'), b'bar'])
Traceback (most
New submission from Christian Mikula:
OS Windows 8 Enterprise x64 clean installed.
Python Version 2.6.6 and 2.7.3 both x64 installed.
Problem is to delete one Directory and immediately after create one new with
the same Name!
!!! Code !!!
import sys, platform, os, shutil
TEST_PATH = /test
Changes by Christian Mikula christian.mik...@live.at:
--
type: - crash
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15946
___
___
R. David Murray added the comment:
I believe this is a Windows...feature? We have lots of trouble with this
ourselves in the test suite, if I understand correctly.
--
nosy: +brian.curtin, r.david.murray, tim.golden
___
Python tracker
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
I've updated the patch changing fseek_error goto block error return from
PyErr_SetFromErrno to PyErr_Format(ZipImportError, can't read Zip file: %R,
archive); (returning NULL after).
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27194/issue15897_v1.patch
Christian Mikula added the comment:
I also think that it is a windows feature! who should report this problem with
microsoft?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15946
___
New submission from Facundo Batista:
In the doc it says:
Assigning a new value to instances of the pointer types c_char_p, c_wchar_p,
and c_void_p changes the memory location they point to, not the contents of the
memory block [...].
s = Hello, World
c_s = c_wchar_p(s)
print(c_s)
Christian Heimes added the comment:
You can further compress the changes when you get rid of `rc` and check the
return value inline, for example:
if (fseek(...) == -1) {
errorhandler;
}
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Jeremy Kloth added the comment:
This test is still intermittently failing on the AMD64 Windows7 SP1 buildbot:
http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/AMD64%20Windows7%20SP1%203.x/builds/630
Any chance the patch could be committed?
--
___
Python
New submission from Christian Heimes:
Python's C code contains more than 30 lines that don't check the return value
of I/O functions like fseek(). A missing check can hide issues like a failing
NFS connection.
I've created an (incomplete) list of missing checks with find and grep.
$ find
Chris Jerdonek added the comment:
I would recommend making the added and modified lines not exceed 79 characters
in both files. Also, for the .rst file, you can use slashes to break lines as
shown in the following example:
Chris Jerdonek added the comment:
Also, while not strictly necessary, it is more customary and convenient to
provide a single patch file for all files.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14570
Brian Curtin added the comment:
I'm not sure Microsoft is going to change anything about this - it has done
this for a long time, if not forever. We recently had #15496 receive changes,
and #7443 is in the same area and has more details and some patches, so I'd
suggest taking up the
New submission from Chris Jerdonek:
docs.python.org doesn't seem to be getting updated anymore. For example, this
revision from Tuesday, Sept 11 is not reflected:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/c8d60d0c736b
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
messages: 170525
nosy:
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
v4 - inline fseek return code check - as Christian suggested
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27195/issue15897_v4.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15897
Chris Jerdonek added the comment:
I also notice that there is an unnecessary call to time.sleep(0.1) whenever the
loop exhausts. This adds .1 seconds to the test run for every call to
test_today() on, for example, platforms that never get the same value twice
(according to the code comment).
Changes by Chris Rebert pyb...@rebertia.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27196/subprocess.rst-2.7.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14616
___
Chris Rebert added the comment:
Updated patches to mention pipes.quote().
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27197/subprocess.rst-3.3.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14616
Chris Jerdonek added the comment:
I think this would be useful as well. For example, it would let one more
easily get finer-grained test result data (e.g. to the level of doctest
examples rather than just the TestCase level). Without this, I needed to
monkey patch.
The previously attached
Thomas Lee added the comment:
Working on a patch for this. Should be ready for review shortly.
--
nosy: +thomaslee
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15887
___
Chris Jerdonek added the comment:
Here are the 6 cases where it always exhausts on my system:
test_today (test.datetimetester.TestSubclassDateTime_Pure)
test_today (test.datetimetester.TestDateTimeTZ_Pure)
test_today (test.datetimetester.TestDateTime_Pure)
test_today
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis added the comment:
Changing of name of subdirectory would break e.g. shell scripts, which set
PYTHONPATH=build/lib when calling Python scripts, so this change rather should
not be made in micro releases.
--
___
Chris Jerdonek added the comment:
I think we can avoid unnecessary sleeps if we only loop again if the final
assert fails (i.e. by including the or condition with the time delta
allowance inside the loop and not just outside).
--
___
Python tracker
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset bc5c5b79b7e1 by Antoine Pitrou in branch '3.2':
Issue #15526: try to fix test_startfile's inability to clean up after itself in
time.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/bc5c5b79b7e1
New changeset 1704deb7e6d7 by Antoine Pitrou in branch 'default':
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Ok, hopefully there'll no more be failures now.
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: - committed/rejected
versions: +Python 3.2
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15526
Thomas Lee added the comment:
Patch attached. Terry, you'll notice I wrap the main part of the urlencode
function in a big try/except block to catch TypeErrors ValueErrors.
I'm a bit concerned that doing this may misreport the true underlying error in
the event we screw up values/types in a
Ezio Melotti added the comment:
The comment before the check states 4 possible reasons for this failure:
1. It recently became midnight, between the today() and the time() calls.
2. The platform time() has such fine resolution that we'll never get the same
value twice.
3. The platform
Chris Jerdonek added the comment:
if today == todayagain:
-break
+return # test passed
Might it make more sense to do the passing time-delta check inside the loop (at
the above location), and then raise an exception at the end if the loop
exhausts? I think
Ezio Melotti added the comment:
That won't always work for case 1 (when theclass is e.g. 'date') and for case 4
(even if it's unlikely).
Technically 2 loops should be enough, but without the sleep I don't think it
matters much if it does 1 or 3 loops.
--
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
I can submit patches..
Is there any problem to send 1 patch per module?
--
nosy: +felipecruz
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15948
___
Ezio Melotti added the comment:
I think that's OK.
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
stage: - needs patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15948
___
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12075
___
___
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
keywords: +easy
versions: +Python 3.3, Python 3.4 -Python 3.1
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1052827
___
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
stage: - patch review
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15606
___
___
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
keywords: +easy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12321
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Julian Berman added the comment:
It's kind of unfortunate that `mock.patch` is called `mock.patch`. I was
thinking about this a bit more yesterday, and `mock.patch.object` is the one
that I think would be most appropriate to put on `TestCase`, and the best name
for it is probably `patch`, but
Felipe Cruz added the comment:
Add tests for {RawIO,BufferedIO,TextIO}.writelines()
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +felipecruz
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27200/issue15744_v1.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Chris Jerdonek added the comment:
That won't always work for case 1 (when theclass is e.g. 'date') and for case
4 (even if it's unlikely).
Can you explain what you mean by this? It seems the timedelta allowance would
be equally valid and serve the same purpose no matter what case or
Ezio Melotti added the comment:
I tried to remove a few unused regex and inline some of the others (the re
module has its own caching anyway and they don't seem to be documented), but it
didn't get so much faster (see attached patch).
I then put the second list of email imports of the
R. David Murray added the comment:
It detects whether a string contains any characters have been surrogate escaped
by the surrogate escape handler. I disliked using it, but I didn't know of any
better way to do that detection. It's on my long list of things to come back
to eventually and
Thomas Lee added the comment:
Patch against hg tip attached.
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +thomaslee
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27202/issue-15893-01.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15893
Ezio Melotti added the comment:
http://docs.python.org/dev/py3k/reference/datamodel.html says Last updated on
Sep 11, 2012.
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti, georg.brandl
type: - behavior
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Ezio Melotti added the comment:
Given that high surrogates are U+D800..U+DBFF, and low ones are U+DC00..U+DFFF,
'([^\ud800-\udbff]|\A)[\udc00-\udfff]([^\udc00-\udfff]|\Z)' means a low
surrogates, preceded by either an high one or line beginning, and followed by
another low one or line end.
51 matches
Mail list logo
