Médéric Boquien added the comment:
I have now signed the contributor's agreement.
As for the unit test I was looking at it. However, I was wondering how to write
a test that would have triggered the problem. It only shows up for very large
arrays and it depends on occupied memory and the
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
Sounds reasonable to me. Were there particular uses you needed this for? And
do you want to work on a patch?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2
paul j3 added the comment:
From http://bugs.python.org/issue14156
argparse.FileType for '-' doesn't work for a mode of 'rb'
I learned that 'stdin/out' can be embedded in an 'open' by using the 'fileno()'
and 'closefd=False' (so it isn't closed at the end of open).
With this, the dummy file
paul j3 added the comment:
A related issue http://bugs.python.org/issue13824
argparse.FileType opens a file and never closes it
I proposed a FileContext class that returns a `partial(open, filename,...)'
context object. The issues of how to deal with stdin/out are similar.
--
New submission from Andrey:
Hi all,
The PyArena data type is defined in the pyarena.h under the #ifndef
Py_LIMITED_API statement, so it's not included in the limited api. But this
type is used in Python-ast.h, ast.h and asdl.h headers that included in the
limited api, because they don't
STINNER Victor added the comment:
str.translate() currently allocates a buffer of UCS4 characters.
translate_writer.patch:
- modify _PyUnicode_TranslateCharmap() to use the _PyUnicodeWriter API
- drop optimizations for error handlers different than ignore because there
is no unit tests for
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com:
--
stage: - patch review
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21118
___
___
dellair jie added the comment:
Martin,
Here is the values presented on Python 3.4.0, in fact they are the same as
3.3.2, please note the key difference.
/* #undef HAVE_SIGTIMEDWAIT */
#define HAVE_SIGWAIT 1
#define HAVE_SIGWAITINFO 1
The SIGTIMEDWAIT is undef while the SIGWAIT is defined.
The
STINNER Victor added the comment:
So shall we close this issue?
Nope. Could you please try the test described in msg215249?
We might integrate
https://github.com/Alexpux/MSYS2-packages/blob/master/python3/3.3.2-cygwin-siginfo.patch
but it would be better to fix sigwaitinfo() if it works
Lotus Qin added the comment:
get the __doc__ in a wrong way, it works now.
--
resolution: - invalid
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21113
___
New submission from nils:
I got an error while rebuilding a module for 3.4. This was a ISO C90 error but
setup.py explicitely adds -std=c99 to the gcc parameters, and indeed it is
used.
fifo.h:114:5: error: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code
[-Werror=declaration-after-statement]
Robert Kuska added the comment:
Ok, I have started a thread at pypa-devs google group.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/pypa-dev/r6qsAmJl9t0
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1298835
New submission from Jonas Wagner:
CPython fails to build with LLVM's link-time optimization (LTO) in Mac OS. Very
similar commands work on Linux.
I'm currently configuring CPython as follows:
on Linux:
RANLIB=ar -s --plugin=/path/to/llvm/lib/LLVMgold.so
CC=/path/to/llvm/bin/clang
dellair jie added the comment:
Victor,
Would you please be more specific on test_signal?
Br,
Dellair
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21085
___
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +haypo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21122
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +koobs
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21122
___
___
Python-bugs-list
STINNER Victor added the comment:
Would you please be more specific on test_signal?
Please try to compile Python 3.4 with the attached cygwin_si_band.patch
applied, and then run test_signal. I would like to know if all tests pass, and
if not, which tests are failing. I also would like to
Changes by Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl:
--
nosy: +djc
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20767
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Dirkjan Ochtman added the comment:
Can we have some more feedback on this?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20767
___
___
STINNER Victor added the comment:
See also issue #21122.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20767
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +loewis
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21120
___
___
Python-bugs-list
STINNER Victor added the comment:
Sounds reasonable to me. Were there particular uses you needed this for?
And do you want to work on a patch?
I don't understand why PyArg_Parse*() functions have formats for integers
checking overflow for signed integers, but not for unsigned integers.
Jonas Wagner added the comment:
I am indeed using Clang 3.4 (both the one that ships with Mac OS, and a version
compiled from the sources).
However, the errors I get are rather different than #20767. In particular,
Clang finishes successfully and does produce shared object files; they just
STINNER Victor added the comment:
What is your clang version? See also issue #20767.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21122
___
Dirkjan Ochtman added the comment:
That does look to be a different issue, though.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20767
___
___
R. David Murray added the comment:
There were a bunch of changes to pydoc in 3.4, so I'm not surprised that it
doesn't use DumbWriter any more (possibly as part of the formatter pending
deprecation). I think I was answering why it wasn't deprecated as part of the
htmllib deprecation.
R. David Murray added the comment:
OK, I didn't even realize that was possible with partial. Now I understand
Yuri's original point. His example is wrong:
def foo(a, b):
...print(a, b)
x2 = partial(foo, 'x')
str(inspect.signature(x2))
'(b)'
This is the correct example:
x =
Changes by Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org:
--
nosy: +larry
priority: normal - high
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21121
___
R. David Murray added the comment:
By didn't know that was possible, I mean binding a positional argument as a
keyword argument in the partial. If nobody else thought that was possible,
maybe can just fix it :)
--
___
Python tracker
dellair jie added the comment:
Victor,
I suppose that Python needs to be built successfully before running test_signal.
Three patches were applied in Python 3.4.0. However, the build failed to build
_struct module.
Should I open another Issue to track it?
As long as the build goes through
New submission from dellair jie:
Dear all,
I am compiling Python 3.4 on Cygwin 1.7.17.
The following has been done in order to reach the point where _struct module
failed.
A clean Python 3.4
Applied patches:
cygwin_si_band.patch in Issue21085
New submission from dellair jie:
Dear all,
I am compiling Python 3.4 on Cygwin 1.7.17.
The following has been done in order to reach the point where _struct module
failed.
A clean Python 3.4
Applied patches:
cygwin_si_band.patch in Issue21085
dellair jie added the comment:
The full build log
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file34696/Build.log
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21124
___
Yury Selivanov added the comment:
@Nick:
Ouch... I'm halfway through the implementation, and it seems like your idea
isn't going to work.
Example (from unittest):
def foo(a=1, b=2, c=3): pass
_foo = partial(foo, a=10, c=13)
Now, the signature for _foo, with your logic applied, will
Yury Selivanov added the comment:
@R. David:
Yes, thank you, David. Too bad I haven't seen your last messages before I
started working on the patch...
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21117
R. David Murray added the comment:
We'll have to wait for Nick to chime in, but I'll make a couple of comments.
First, I think this is a bug in partial, so I think we need to decide what, if
anything, to do about that first, before we decide if signature needs to
compensate for it or not.
New submission from Glenn Maynard:
https://docs.python.org/2/library/traceback.html
A “pre-processed” stack trace entry is a quadruple (filename, line number,
function name, text) representing the information that is usually printed for a
stack trace.
There's no such thing as a quadruple.
Yury Selivanov added the comment:
First, I think this is a bug in partial, so I think we need to decide what,
if anything, to do about that first, before we decide if signature needs to
compensate for it or not.
Agree. Although, it looks like it's not something that partial is doing, it
Yury Selivanov added the comment:
Although, it looks like it's not something that partial is doing, it seems
like this call logic is implemented somewhere way deeper.
Forget about what I said.
Yes, it's a bug in partial. Fixing it, will require having the code from
Signature.bind reflected
R. David Murray added the comment:
Oh, the error message comes from deep in the guts of python, yes. I'm saying
that the fact that partial lets you write partial(foo, a='bar') when a is a
positional argument is a bug. Even if other people agree with me (and they may
not, consenting adults
R. David Murray added the comment:
A google for quadruple got me wikipedia as the first hit, with this as the
match text:
Quadruple may refer to: A 4-tuple, ...
So, it's tech-speak. The alternative would be to say either a 4-tuple or a
tuple of four elements. I'm fine with someone
dellair jie added the comment:
Duplicated with Issue21124
--
resolution: - duplicate
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21123
___
Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment:
If there are no other concerns I will commit latest patch tomorrow, then do the
renaming.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21076
___
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 2e13f0d49b8e by Zachary Ware in branch '2.7':
Issue #15067: Remove reference to a rejected PEP.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/2e13f0d49b8e
New changeset 4a2dabac976d by Zachary Ware in branch '3.4':
Issue #15067: Port 2.7 sqlite3 docs to 3.4
Claudiu.Popa added the comment:
But the last traceback conveys enough information, the user can see immediately
that the given section does not exist.
My problem with the current behaviour is that the first error distracts the
user, while the actual problem is the second traceback.
But I have
Changes by Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com:
--
components: +Interpreter Core -Extension Modules
stage: - needs patch
type: - enhancement
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2
New submission from Giampaolo Rodola':
In order to run a certain function via doctest run_docstring_examples() can be
used:
http://stackoverflow.com/a/10081450/376587
The function returns None though.
I am in a situation where I want to run a single function's doctest from a
unittest and want
R. David Murray added the comment:
Why? Just let the context convey the information. It's not like we are
building a UI here, this is for the programmer.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19546
R. David Murray added the comment:
Although I will grant you that I have to guess at what the bad value
substitution error message is trying to tell me, so that error message could
use some improvement.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
michael kearney added the comment:
Observation:
Tools\buildbot\build.bat solves all the problems I was having.
That is to say, a single command exists to build python on
windows w/o problems. It has worked since at least since python 3.3.1, which I
think preceded my original submission.
Josh Rosenberg added the comment:
@haypo: Are you planning to run with this then? Or shall I pick up where your
patch leaves off?
Thanks for the pointer to the codecs charmap_build; it's not documented
anywhere that I can tell, so I didn't even know it existed. Now to dig into the
source to
Nick Coghlan added the comment:
Huh, that actually sounds like a possible design flaw in the core argument
binding semantics. I'll have to think about that one some more.
In the meantime, as far as this issue goes, I'm inclined to say that signature
should throw an exception to be clear that
Nick Coghlan added the comment:
Oh, wait, it *does* have a usable signature. It's just that all the
*subsequent* positional-or-keyword parameters also have to be marked as
keyword-only.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
New submission from Antony Lee:
Trying to construct a Path object from a str subclass, e.g.
class S(str): pass
Path(S(foo))
fails because the subclass cannot be interned. I think that the interning
should simply be removed for non-exactly-str arguments (it is only here for
performance
New submission from mattip:
In continuation of issue 20887, this patch closes and removes all temp files
created while running regression tests for stdlib 2.7.6 on win32 and pypy. Note
that a gc.collect was required to release the closed files in test_argparse, as
well as making them all rw.
Ned Deily added the comment:
Just as an experiment (using the 3.4 branch and the Xcode 5.1 clang), the list
of unique symbols not found during the test dlopen in setup.py when using -flto:
_PyArg_ParseTuple
_PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords
_PyBaseObject_Type
_PyBool_Type
_PyByteArray_Type
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 9186f4a18584 by Benjamin Peterson in branch '3.2':
remove directory mode check from makedirs (closes #21082)
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/9186f4a18584
New changeset 6370d44013f7 by Benjamin Peterson in branch '3.3':
merge 3.2 (#21082)
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
I've now removed the offending behavior. exist_ok is still racy because it uses
path.isdir() in the exceptional case, but fixing that can be an enhancement
elsewhere.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python
Yury Selivanov added the comment:
Oh, wait, it *does* have a usable signature. It's just that all the
*subsequent* positional-or-keyword parameters also have to be marked as
keyword-only.
Interesting idea. I'll incorporate this logic into the patch.
--
Ned Deily added the comment:
It looks like -Werror=declaration-after-statement was added to BASECFLAGS in
configure.ac during the 3.4 development cycle by a3559c8c614b and e47806951fb2.
Unfortunately, BASECFLAGS propagates through to extension module builds as
well. If
Ned Deily added the comment:
This looks like a duplicate of Issue6672.
--
components: +Build
nosy: +ned.deily
resolution: - duplicate
stage: - committed/rejected
status: open - pending
superseder: - Add Mingw recognition to pyport.h to allow building extensions
title: Compilation
Changes by Ned Deily n...@acm.org:
--
nosy: +pitrou
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21127
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Changes by Ned Deily n...@acm.org:
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +serhiy.storchaka
stage: - patch review
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21128
___
nils added the comment:
The workaround indeed works. At least I can work now until this gets officialy
fixed. Thanks!
export CFLAGS=$(python3.4 -c 'import sysconfig;
print(sysconfig.get_config_var(CFLAGS).replace(-Werror=declaration-after-statement,))')
--
New submission from Mayank Gupta:
If I open the python interpreter:
$ python
Then type
def to_hex(i):
result = hex(i)[2:]
My interpreter segfaults (EXC_BAD_ACCESS).
Here's a backtrace from lldb:
(lldb) bt
* thread #1: tid = 0x152e7f, 0x0001002eff97 readline.so`call_readline +
647, queue
Zachary Ware added the comment:
If you're using OS X 10.9+, you'll need to upgrade your Python installation.
See #18458.
--
nosy: +zach.ware
resolution: - duplicate
stage: - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
superseder: - interactive interpreter crashes and test_readline
Changes by Eric Snow ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +eric.snow
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4712
___
Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
I'll make the change to 4-tuple.
--
assignee: docs@python - rhettinger
nosy: +rhettinger
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21125
___
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 1c112eb4eb56 by Raymond Hettinger in branch '2.7':
Issue 21125: minor wording tweak.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/1c112eb4eb56
--
nosy: +python-dev
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset dfa399e74fcf by Raymond Hettinger in branch '3.4':
Issue 21125: minor documentation tweak.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/dfa399e74fcf
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
Thanks for the bug report, Glenn.
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21125
___
Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
The patch looks clean and correct. It passes the test suite.
I recommend going ahead and applying the patch.
--
nosy: +rhettinger
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20968
Changes by Joshua Bronson jabron...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +jab
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18652
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
73 matches
Mail list logo
