Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
May be there is a time to optimize creating Python frames (at least for the
case when one frame is created and destroyed multiple times). May be frame
pool? Or cached one frame per function?
--
___
Python tracker
Changes by Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk:
--
components: +Windows
nosy: +steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12026
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
To echo Brett's question, should this be closed, Eric?
--
status: pending - open
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21099
___
Berker Peksag added the comment:
LGTM.
--
nosy: +berker.peksag, r.david.murray
stage: - commit review
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23511
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
To echo Brett's question, do we still need this patch, Eric?
--
status: pending - open
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19711
___
Paul Moore added the comment:
Thanks, I'll fix for the next iteration of the patch.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23491
___
___
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I believe this has been fixed by changesets f02a563ad1bf and ed73c127421c in
#21635.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9985
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
- in the given patch __add__ uses __iadd__, but __sub__ doesn't use
__isub__, which seems a bit weird.
If Counters are positive (common case), then the result of addition is not
less than both summands. a + b is a and may be additional elements from b.
In
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Is this effectively superseded by work being done on #23496?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12010
___
Baptiste Mispelon added the comment:
Patch attached.
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file38228/issue23511.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23511
___
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can we have a review on the updated patch please.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2142
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@David could you check Skip's patch out please. It seems identical to your own
other than changing the delimiter from the empty string to a comma.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I've changed this issue to reflect what I think it should be saying.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
title: No warning for csv.writer API change - csv.reader/writer to raise
exception if mode is binary or newline is not ''
type: enhancement - behavior
versions:
Gregory P. Smith added the comment:
A side effect of the changes made within are that getstatusoutput() on POSIX
systems now returns a different value for status.
The old implementation present in Python 2 and Python 3.3 before this patch
returned the raw waitpid() status result as the status
Gregory P. Smith added the comment:
http://bugs.python.org/issue23508 to track the fall out of that.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10197
___
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23507
___
___
New submission from Serhiy Storchaka:
Currently tuples creating uses free lists. But this optimization is not enough.
When reuse cached tuple for arguments of repeatedly called functions, the
performance of some builtins can be significantly increased.
$ ./python -m timeit -s f = lambda x: x
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15753
___
___
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
The changes referenced in msg204494 ref: #19466 were reverted via changesets
9ce58a73b6b5 and 1166b3321012
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14073
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Can we have a patch review please. If nothing else xrange will have to change
for Python 3.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Python's SSL isn't using that. Python is taking in one big text file
of SSL certs, with no link structure, and feeding it to OpenSSL.
Python's SSL is not taking anything:
r = urlopen('https://www.verisign.com')
r.read(10)
b' !DOCTYPE'
It's only if you
Jörn Hees added the comment:
cool
minor question:
- in the given patch __add__ uses __iadd__, but __sub__ doesn't use __isub__,
which seems a bit weird.
maybe off-topic, but maybe not, because of _keep_positive(self):
- is there place for a non multi-set centric Stats object which is like
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
The tests are checking that they are the same value (8) and the same type (int)?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17576
___
New submission from Baptiste Mispelon:
The first code example at
https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/email-examples.html throws an
`AttributeError` because `MIMEText`'s constructor expects a `str` object, not a
`bytes` one:
# Import smtplib for the actual sending function
... import smtplib
New submission from Edward D'Souza:
The list of built-in functions at the top of
https://docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html is not alphabetical.
Specifically, (apply, coerce, intern, buffer) allow appear out of order at the
end of the list, instead of where they should be
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
@Demian I believe this may be of interest to you.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, demian.brecht
versions: -Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23138
Manuel Jacob added the comment:
Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems to me that
test_int_subclass_with_index() is testing for the exactly wrong behaviour.
Isn't the point of this issue that operator.index(a) should be equal to
a.__index__()? Why are the tests checking that they are
Changes by Cory Benfield c...@lukasa.co.uk:
--
nosy: +Lukasa
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23476
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
resolution: - not a bug
stage: - resolved
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23476
___
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
and it is not reproducible using openssl s_client
I have determined that s_client is buggy. It will always load the system certs
*if and only if* you also pass it a valid custom CA cert (which is the reverse
of what's expected).
This is where it happens (in
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Ok, this is really a bug in the cert bundle provided by requests and Firefox.
With requests 2.5.1:
$ SSL_CERT_DIR=/tmp SSL_CERT_FILE=/tmp openssl s_client -CAfile
requests/cacert.pem -connect verisign.com:443
= ok
With requests 2.5.2:
$ SSL_CERT_DIR=/tmp
Christian Heimes added the comment:
John, neither Python nor OpenSSL are shipped with certificates.
Python uses certificates from operating system. We decided against our own
certificate store because we wanted to avoid exactly this kind of trouble. If
Python can't verify a certificate then
Davin Potts added the comment:
A much simpler example of code triggering the described issue:
import multiprocessing.managers
with multiprocessing.managers.SyncManager() as s:
print here
Running the above code in 2.7.9 results in an exception with the traceback:
Traceback
Changes by Davin Potts pyt...@discontinuity.net:
--
nosy: +davin
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23513
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Stefan Behnel sco...@users.sourceforge.net:
--
nosy: +scoder
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23507
___
___
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
The probability of a collision when generated n numbers from 0 to m-1 is
1 - factorial(m)/factorial(m-n)/m**n
When n sqrt(m), it is approximately equal to n**2/(2*m). When m = 100,
we have problems for n about 1000. When increase m to 2**32, the
Changes by Cezary Wagner cezary.wag...@gmail.com:
--
versions: +Python 2.7
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23514
___
___
Laura Creighton added the comment:
Antione closed this, as a not python error, as
if you do not pass a valid certificate to openssl s_client
it will not read the system certificates, which is clearly
utterly surprising and nuts.
The problem, as I see it, is that fixing this clear
absurdity may
Changes by Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +Aaron.Meurer
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23476
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Cory Benfield added the comment:
The problem specifically is that OpenSSL only uses a *root* in the trust store
as an anchor. That means any certificate that is signed by another certificate
will not terminate the chain of trust. Browsers do better here, by trusting the
entirety of the trust
Cezary Wagner added the comment:
Yes it is what is wanted by me and other people I think.
1. enter has not start call.
2. exit has shutdown but it is not supported
3. 'with' is what is need since it is simple to manage
Good analysis.
--
___
Python
Davin Potts added the comment:
Successfully reproduced on OS X 10.10 with 2.7.9.
Changing the issue type to behavior because crash is reserved for Hard
crashes of the Python interpreter – possibly with a core dump or a Windows
error box. In this issue, we do see an exception get raised but
Cezary Wagner added the comment:
I am fighting with multiprocessing and still not won - I need to invent new
Python coding style to use it and can not reduce ugly code/microcoding. It is
not because it is not possible to do it in Python easier but because it is not
improved yet.
--
Cezary Wagner added the comment:
Should I add this suggestion to open before issue?
I started doing multiprocessing code in Python so I can have more suggestions
since I found that documentation can be improved I will report specific problem.
--
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Ah, it just checks current behavior. So we will know when this will be changed.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17576
___
Oleg Broytman added the comment:
I created the attached module to work with new FF in Python 2.7. You can
convert it to proper patch for webbrowser.py.
--
nosy: +phd
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file38227/new_firefox.py
___
Python tracker
Ryan Gonzalez added the comment:
So...
I know a decent amount of configure scripts, although Python's is easily going
to be the absolute longest I've ever touched.
Maybe these should be made against the 3.6 Mercurial source? I'm not sure if
the Python devs would prefer that.
Also, should
Daniel Holth added the comment:
Spelling
raise PackError(Cannot spacify entry point if the source has __main__.py)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23491
___
New submission from Tim Peters:
Some researchers found an error in the logic of merge_collapse, explained here,
and with corrected code shown in section 3.2:
http://envisage-project.eu/proving-android-java-and-python-sorting-algorithm-is-broken-and-how-to-fix-it/
This affects all current
Changes by Alex Gaynor alex.gay...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +alex
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23515
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
New submission from Tommaso Barbugli:
Hi,
I am porting a library from python 2.7 to 3.4 and I noticed that the behaviour
of datetime.utcfromtimestamp is not consistent between the two versions.
For example on python 2.7.5
datetime.utcfromtimestamp(1424817268.274)
returns a datetime with
Demian Brecht added the comment:
I can't tell how to label this bug report because I don't know where pip
comes from: as far as I knew this is a bug in something called urllib3, which
seemed to me that was related to Python itself, or maybe in the way pip is
calling it, and I assumed pip
Changes by Demian Brecht demianbre...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +Marcus.Smith, dstufft, ncoghlan, pmoore
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23516
___
Ethan Furman added the comment:
This isn't a change to the API or any visible user behavior (besides
performance), so I don't see a reason to not add it to 3.4.
--
nosy: +barry, eli.bendersky
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Ethan Furman added the comment:
This seems to have changed in 3.3 (versions up to 3.2 return 274000).
--
nosy: +ethan.furman
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23517
___
Martin Panter added the comment:
Sounds like this might be in a third-party module, not in Python itself. But
see also Issue 23328 and Issue 18140.
The RFC you referenced also says this, which suggests the authority cannot
contain a literal question mark:
‘The authority component . . . is
Guido van Rossum added the comment:
The patch no longer applies cleanly. I had to do hg up -r ac0d6c09457e to get
a checkpoint to which it applies. (But I'm not sure at what point that landed
me.)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Demian Brecht demianbre...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +demian.brecht
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23516
___
___
Demian Brecht added the comment:
Sounds like this might be in a third-party module
+1. urllib3.url_parse doesn't make use of the standard library.
userinfo = *( unreserved / pct-encoded / sub-delims / : )
This leads me to believe that using something like this might work:
from urllib.parse
Martin Panter added the comment:
I suspect it may not be practical to check the newline translation mode of a
TextIOWrapper or StringIO stream, and I don’t think newline translation is even
required in general for text stream classes. Beware that the “newlines”
attribute isn’t going to help;
Changes by Chris Kaynor ckay...@zindagigames.com:
--
nosy: +DragonFireCK
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23515
___
___
New submission from Leonardo Tancredi:
I was running pip install with the --proxy switch to authenticate to a proxy
server with user user and password pass?word, when I noticed it fails. It
seems to fail when the password contains some special characters, v.g., ? and #.
Here's the exception I
Changes by Skip Montanaro s...@pobox.com:
--
nosy: -skip.montanaro
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10954
___
___
Python-bugs-list
New submission from Zack Weinberg:
I tripped over a couple of SyntaxError cases where the diagnostic caret is
misplaced.
While x:
File stdin, line 1
While x:
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
The caret should point to the capital W in 'While'.
for x in
Ethan Furman added the comment:
Eli, did you ever make any progress with this? Anything you can post so
someone else can run with it if you don't have time?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17963
Changes by Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us:
--
nosy: -ethan.furman
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9938
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Martin Panter vadmium...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +vadmium
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8895
___
___
Python-bugs-list
67 matches
Mail list logo
