Changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +Arfrever
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24481
___
New submission from Марк Коренберг:
If I pass an list of futures/coroutines as (done, _) = asyncio.wait([...]),
order of elements in `done` does NOT match order of elements in `wait`'s
argument. This is not documented, and I don't know if that is a bug or not.
Also, documentation say:
Wait
Ingo Ruhnke added the comment:
This fix has broken mail retrieval from both gmx.de, gmail.com and plenty of
other provider.
It manifests in getmail as:
Retrieval error: server for BrokenUIDLPOP3SSLRetriever:1860...@pop.gmx.net:995
is broken; offered message 239 but failed to provide it.
Guido van Rossum added the comment:
The docs say that it returns two *sets* and Python's set datatype is unordered.
So that's all you need to know. I don't think there's anything else needed in
the docs.
--
resolution: - not a bug
status: open - closed
Changes by Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: ncoghlan -
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15376
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: ncoghlan -
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18576
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: ncoghlan -
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15403
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: ncoghlan -
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15358
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Ingo Ruhnke added the comment:
This also breaks mail retrieval from both gmx.de and gmail.com (two rather
large and popular mail provider). After setting _MAXLINE
in/usr/lib/python2.7/poplib.py to some arbitrary higher number mail retrieval
from both services worked fine again.
This this
Changes by Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: ncoghlan -
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18578
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
The patch for 2.7 also fixed SystemError and possible memory leak.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24456
___
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset b784c842a63c by Jason R. Coombs in branch '3.4':
Issue #20387: Add test capturing failure to roundtrip indented code in tokenize
module.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/b784c842a63c
New changeset 49323e5f6391 by Jason R. Coombs in branch '3.4':
Changes by R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com:
--
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5, Python 3.6 -Python 3.2
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23906
___
R. David Murray added the comment:
The RFC is in fact not clear on this point. It is entirely possible to read it
as saying that each line of a mulitline response is limited to 512 octets. I
agree, however, that that is not the most reasonable interpretation. Instead,
the line length of
Jason R. Coombs added the comment:
Benjamin, any objections to a backport of this patch?
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20387
___
Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +berker.peksag
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18578
___
___
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset f0053d05ed6d by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '3.4':
Issue #24336: The contextmanager decorator now works with functions with
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/f0053d05ed6d
New changeset 20aa7083057e by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '3.5':
Issue #24336:
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Thank you Martin for your patch.
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: commit review - resolved
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24336
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 1f6c096ee772 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '2.7':
Issue #24456: Fixed possible buffer over-read in adpcm2lin() and lin2adpcm()
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/1f6c096ee772
New changeset fd17e168b59f by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '3.4':
Issue
file: http://bugs.python.org/file39824/20150628.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23670
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https
Jason R. Coombs added the comment:
Patch and test applied to 3.4+. I'm inclined to backport this to Python 2.7, as
that was where I encountered it originally.
--
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com:
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: needs patch - resolved
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24456
___
Changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +Arfrever
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24522
___
Changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +Arfrever
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24521
___
Meador Inge added the comment:
FYI, I posted a patch to handle this case and the regression
noted in issue24485 on issue24485.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21217
___
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
The bytearray object allocates one byte more for trailing null byte. ob_size
always should be less than ob_alloc if ob_alloc != 0. But in rare cases when
the bytearray is initialized with an iterator, this rule can be violated.
Following patch restores this
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: - serhiy.storchaka
stage: - patch review
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5, Python 3.6
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24467
Meador Inge added the comment:
Here is a first cut patch that moves things back to using a syntax-level
analysis instead of a bytecode-level one. I extended `BlockFinder`
to skip decorators.
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +meador.inge
stage: test needed - patch review
Added file:
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 524a0e755797 by Jason R. Coombs in branch '2.7':
Issue #20387: Backport test from Python 3.4
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/524a0e755797
New changeset cb9df1ae287b by Jason R. Coombs in branch '2.7':
Issue #20387: Backport fix from Python 3.4
Jason R. Coombs added the comment:
For the sake of expediency, I've gone ahead and backported and pushed the fix
to 2.7. Please back out the changes if appropriate.
--
resolution: - fixed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: - serhiy.storchaka
stage: - patch review
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24462
___
DmitryJ added the comment:
If this is the case, then issue24462 should be fixed by this patch as well.
I'm sorry about missing the root cause here.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24467
New submission from Tomas Nordin:
$ python
Python 2.7.9 (default, Mar 1 2015, 18:22:53)
[GCC 4.9.2] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
The readline tab completion thing should be loaded. (pythonstartup.py @home)
import Tkinter as tk
import tkFileDialog
Christie added the comment:
If #18576 gets merged before this does, I have some updated docs for the new
helper functions.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24033
___
Christie added the comment:
Hello all!
So the following are waiting for review:
* #24033
* #23981
* #24279
I'm going to hold off on continuing to refactor any other modules for the
moment, would be great to get the above wrapped up and eventually merged when
possible.
Thanks!
- Christie
Christie added the comment:
Hey @vadmium!
I've finally responded to your review feedback. I've attached a new patch,
hopefully this time actually review-able. I've removed the docs for methods I
added in @24033 so that this could be merged without it.
Let me know if you have any more
36 matches
Mail list logo
