[issue24536] os.pipe() should return a structsequence (or namedtuple.)
Chris Angelico added the comment: Another good option is read/write without the 'fd' suffix. Either works, I'd prefer the shorter one but by a small margin. -- nosy: +Rosuav ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24536 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24534] disable executing code in .pth files
Changes by Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de: -- nosy: +christian.heimes ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24534 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24534] disable executing code in .pth files
Nick Coghlan added the comment: As others have noted, we're not going to change this default in the standard CPython executable (due to the degree of disruption involved), and the -S and -I switches already effectively turn it off (by disabling site module processing entirely) However, it could be reasonable to consider offering a way to disable *just* the execution of arbitrary code from .pth files, while otherwise allowing the site module to run. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24534 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24536] os.pipe() should return a structsequence (or namedtuple.)
New submission from Jonathan Slenders: As discussed on python-ideas, os.pipe should return a structsequence instead of a plain tuple. To be decided is the naming for the read and write end. Personally, I'm in favour of using readfd/writefd. our_pipe = pipe() os.write(our_pipe.writefd, b'data') os.read(our_pipe.readfd, 1024) -- components: IO messages: 245980 nosy: jonathan.slenders priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: os.pipe() should return a structsequence (or namedtuple.) versions: Python 3.6 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24536 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24400] Awaitable ABC incompatible with functools.singledispatch
Martin Panter added the comment: Opened Issue 24541 related to this latest change. The test and documentation are still inconsistent, even if the test passes. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24400 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24541] test_eightteen() in test_inspect out of sync with documentation
New submission from Martin Panter: Revision 0b7c313851ca highlights an inconsistency in the test case at the top of the TestPredicates class. After removing isawaitable() in Issue 24400, there are now actually eighteen is* functions. The comment in the test case still says there are sixteen (from before the two iscoroutine* functions were added), and so does the documentation it references: ‘The sixteen functions whose names begin with “is” ’ https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/inspect.html#types-and-members. The quick fix is to change all the numbers to eighteen. But maybe a better fix is to drop it all and rewrite the documentation to just say “The functions whose names begin with “is” are mainly provided . . .”. -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation, Tests messages: 246012 nosy: docs@python, vadmium priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: test_eightteen() in test_inspect out of sync with documentation versions: Python 3.5, Python 3.6 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24541 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24541] test_eightteen() in test_inspect out of sync with documentation
Yury Selivanov added the comment: This has already been fix (see issue24400). I've also updated the comment (16 - 18). Let's keep the test as is. -- nosy: +yselivanov resolution: - fixed stage: - resolved status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24541 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24541] test_eightteen() in test_inspect out of sync with documentation
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset a5c6eaa7d733 by Yury Selivanov in branch '3.5': Issue #24541: Update comment in test_inspect.test_eightteen https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a5c6eaa7d733 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24541 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24487] Change asyncio.async() → ensure_future()
Changes by Yury Selivanov yseliva...@gmail.com: -- status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24487 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24132] Direct sub-classing of pathlib.Path
Kevin Norris added the comment: If I were designing pathlib from scratch, I would not have a separate Path class. I would instead do something like this: In pathlib.py: if os.name == 'nt': Path = WindowsPath else: Path = PosixPath Alternatively, Path() could be a factory function that picks one of those classes at runtime. Of course, that still leaves the issue of where to put the method implementations which currently live in Path. We could change the name of Path to _Path and use the code above to continue providing a Path alias, but that might be too confusing. Another possibility is to pull those methods out into top-level functions and then alias them into methods in WindowsPath and PosixPath (perhaps using a decorator-like-thing to pass the flavor, instead of attaching it to the class). The main thing, though, is that Path should not depend on its subclasses. That really strikes me as poor design, since it produces issues like this one. -- nosy: +Kevin.Norris ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24132 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24487] Change asyncio.async() → ensure_future()
Martin Panter added the comment: Reopening. The patch still applies to the current code (e.g. revision df310e5ac015, 30 June). It changes eight references of “async()” that still exist in this revision. -- status: closed - open ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24487 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24487] Change asyncio.async() → ensure_future()
Yury Selivanov added the comment: Thanks, Martin! -- resolution: out of date - fixed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24487 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24487] Change asyncio.async() → ensure_future()
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 1b3be273e327 by Yury Selivanov in branch '3.5': Issue #24487: Rename async() - ensure_future() in asyncio docs. https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/1b3be273e327 New changeset 3dc2a113e8a7 by Yury Selivanov in branch 'default': Merge 3.5 (Issue #24487) https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/3dc2a113e8a7 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24487 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24542] ssl - SSL_OP_NO_TICKET not reimplemented
New submission from Samuel Hoffman: Realizing the _ssl module does not import very many constants, I think it might be worth while to reimplement and document SSL_OP_NO_TICKET (0x4000) as it's another one of the enable this for improved security at a cost options like SSL_OP_SINGLE_DH_USE and SSL_OP_SINGLE_ECDH_USE. This appears to effect Python 2.7+. -- components: Extension Modules, Library (Lib) messages: 246022 nosy: alex, christian.heimes, dstufft, giampaolo.rodola, janssen, miniCruzer, pitrou priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: ssl - SSL_OP_NO_TICKET not reimplemented type: enhancement versions: Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24542 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24400] Awaitable ABC incompatible with functools.singledispatch
R. David Murray added the comment: Look like you forgot to adjust test_inspect for the removal. eg: http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/AMD64%20Windows8.1%20Non-Debug%203.x/builds/54 -- nosy: +r.david.murray status: closed - open ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24400 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24536] os.pipe() should return a structsequence (or namedtuple.)
Yury Selivanov added the comment: +1 for readfd/writefd. I think 'fd' suffix is necessary to make it explicit that those aren't file objects. -- nosy: +yselivanov ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24536 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24536] os.pipe() should return a structsequence (or namedtuple.)
Yury Selivanov added the comment: Here's a patch, please review. -- keywords: +patch stage: - patch review Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39839/ospipe.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24536 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24400] Awaitable ABC incompatible with functools.singledispatch
Changes by Yury Selivanov yseliva...@gmail.com: -- status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24400 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24400] Awaitable ABC incompatible with functools.singledispatch
Yury Selivanov added the comment: Look like you forgot to adjust test_inspect for the removal. eg: My bad. Thanks, David! -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24400 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24400] Awaitable ABC incompatible with functools.singledispatch
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 0b7c313851ca by Yury Selivanov in branch '3.5': Issue #24400: Fix failing unittest https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/0b7c313851ca New changeset 8c85291e86bf by Yury Selivanov in branch 'default': Merge 3.5 (Issue #24400) https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/8c85291e86bf -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24400 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24541] test_eightteen() in test_inspect out of sync with documentation
Martin Panter added the comment: Okay but what about the documentation? It still claims sixteen. # This test is here for remember you to update Doc/library/inspect.rst -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24541 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23883] __all__ lists are incomplete
Martin Panter added the comment: The technical bit of Issue23883_support_check__all__.v3.patch looks pretty good. Mainly some grammar suggestions for the documentation. Issue23883_test_gettext.v2.patch looks fine; just depends on check__all__() being added. Couple of comments about the APIs for ftplib and threading. The changes for the other modules all look good though. Regarding name_of_module, no strong opinion, but maybe keep it as it is for simplicity. You only used it once so far I think anyway. -- stage: needs patch - patch review ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23883 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24520] Stop using deprecated floating-point environment functions on FreeBSD
Changes by Ed Maste carpedd...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +emaste ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24520 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24520] Stop using deprecated floating-point environment functions on FreeBSD
Changes by koobs koobs.free...@gmail.com: -- keywords: +needs review nosy: +koobs ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24520 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24539] StreamReaderProtocol.eof_received() should return True to keep the transport open
New submission from Guido van Rossum: See https://github.com/python/asyncio/issues/251. I'm on vacation and may or may not find the time to actually fix this (it needs a unittest written). -- components: asyncio messages: 245986 nosy: gvanrossum, haypo, yselivanov priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: StreamReaderProtocol.eof_received() should return True to keep the transport open versions: Python 3.4, Python 3.5, Python 3.6 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24539 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24538] os.setxattr PermissionError on panfs propagates up causing `copystat`, `copytree`, and `pip install .` to fail unhepfully
Changes by Gerrit Holl topjakl...@gmail.com: -- type: - crash ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24538 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24538] os.setxattr PermissionError on panfs propagates up causing `copystat`, `copytree`, and `pip install .` to fail unhepfully
New submission from Gerrit Holl: `shutil.copystat` fails on [panfs](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panasas#PanFS) if the source file lacks u+w, because setting extended attributes results in a `PermissionError`. This leads to higher end functions such as `shutil.copytree` to fail. More seriously, it leads to `pip install .` to fail, as I [reported here](https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/2941): In [55]: shutil.copystat(/src/on/panfs, /tmp/fubar) --- PermissionError Traceback (most recent call last) ipython-input-55-139c9fc77184 in module() 1 shutil.copystat(/home/users/gholl/checkouts/pyatmlab/.git/objects/pack/pack-c1449559ec4287b3830efe2913608dddf2f21391.pack, /tmp/fubar) /home/users/gholl/lib/python3.4/shutil.py in copystat(src, dst, follow_symlinks) 211 else: 212 raise -- 213 _copyxattr(src, dst, follow_symlinks=follow) 214 215 def copy(src, dst, *, follow_symlinks=True): /home/users/gholl/lib/python3.4/shutil.py in _copyxattr(src, dst, follow_symlinks) 151 try: 152 value = os.getxattr(src, name, follow_symlinks=follow_symlinks) -- 153 os.setxattr(dst, name, value, follow_symlinks=follow_symlinks) 154 except OSError as e: 155 if e.errno not in (errno.EPERM, errno.ENOTSUP, errno.ENODATA): PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/tmp/fubar' This occurs for any source file where the user write bit is not set. Now, I'm not sure if this should be addressed in `pip`, `shutil.copytree`, `shutil.copystat`, `setxattr`, `panfs`, or in none of the above. I'm reporting it in different places; please close this issue if this is the wrong place. -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 245985 nosy: Gerrit.Holl priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: os.setxattr PermissionError on panfs propagates up causing `copystat`, `copytree`, and `pip install .` to fail unhepfully versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24538 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23496] Steps for Android Native Build of Python 3.4.2
Cyd Haselton added the comment: Your question about -fPIE brings up a question: How should the differences between Android 5 and previous versions be handled in regards to this issue? Other than mandatory -fPIE, there are changes to Android[s libc that may make patches for python on Android 4.x incompatible with Android 5. Thoughts? On June 29, 2015 9:29:35 AM CDT, Cyd Haselton rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: Cyd Haselton added the comment: No...haven't upgraded to Android 5.0 yet. On June 29, 2015 9:00:01 AM CDT, Ryan Gonzalez rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: Ryan Gonzalez added the comment: You compiled with -fPIE and GCC, right? I know the Android Clang seems broken. On June 29, 2015 7:09:25 AM CDT, Cyd Haselton rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: Cyd Haselton added the comment: FYI, Figured out that running ./configure with --with-pydebug does NOT define Py_DEBUG in pyconfig.h. Defining it in pyconfig.h got me past the undefined reference to `_PyUnicode_CheckConsistency' error, but i'm now getting this: if test $? -ne 0 ; then \ echo generate-posix-vars failed ; \ rm -f ./pybuilddir.txt ; \ exit 1 ; \ fi Debug memory block at address p=0x90b7b0: API '' 2416312320 bytes originally requested The 3 pad bytes at p-3 are not all FORBIDDENBYTE (0xfb): at p-3: 0x00 *** OUCH at p-2: 0x00 *** OUCH at p-1: 0x00 *** OUCH Because memory is corrupted at the start, the count of bytes requested may be bogus, and checking the trailing pad bytes may segfault. The 4 pad bytes at tail=0x9096b7b0 are Segmentation fault generate-posix-vars failed make: *** [pybuilddir.txt] Error 1 Will re-check patch application and try again -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23496 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23496 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23496 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23496 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24538] os.setxattr PermissionError on panfs propagates up causing `copystat`, `copytree`, and `pip install .` to fail unhepfully
Gerrit Holl added the comment: Perhaps the solution would be some kind of flag, at least for copytree and possibly others, on what to do when attributes cannot be completely copied — a bit like numpys options to raise, warn, or ignore? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24538 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24538] os.setxattr PermissionError on panfs propagates up causing `copystat`, `copytree`, and `pip install .` to fail unhepfully
R. David Murray added the comment: There are a couple of related open issues. I think there is an stdlib problem here, but Im not sure what the solution is. -- nosy: +r.david.murray ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24538 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23496] Steps for Android Native Build of Python 3.4.2
Cyd Haselton added the comment: On June 30, 2015 9:20:45 AM CDT, Ryan Gonzalez rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: Ryan Gonzalez added the comment: On June 30, 2015 8:14:34 AM CDT, Cyd Haselton rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: Cyd Haselton added the comment: Your question about -fPIE brings up a question: How should the differences between Android 5 and previous versions be handled in regards to this issue? Other than mandatory -fPIE, there are changes to Android[s libc that may make patches for python on Android 4.x incompatible with Android 5. WHAT??? :( I can't find a list anywhere; how do you know? I tried building GCC for Android 5 on device and ran into a bunch of errors like 'undefined symbol __swbuf.' Googling the errors led to this page: https://developer.android.com/ndk/downloads/revision_history.html. Relevant Part here: Removed the following symbols from all architectures: get_malloc_leak_info,free_malloc_leak_info, __srget, __swbuf, __srefill,__swsetup, __sdidinit, __sflags, __sfp, __sinit, __smakebuf,__sflush, __sread, __swrite, __sseek, __sclose, _fwalk,__sglue, __get_thread, __wait4, __futex_wake, __open,__get_tls, __getdents64, and dlmalloc. Thoughts? Not really... Would setting up two repos be advisable...one for 5 and one for 4.x and earlier? On June 29, 2015 9:29:35 AM CDT, Cyd Haselton rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: Cyd Haselton added the comment: No...haven't upgraded to Android 5.0 yet. On June 29, 2015 9:00:01 AM CDT, Ryan Gonzalez rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: Ryan Gonzalez added the comment: You compiled with -fPIE and GCC, right? I know the Android Clang seems broken. On June 29, 2015 7:09:25 AM CDT, Cyd Haselton rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: Cyd Haselton added the comment: FYI, Figured out that running ./configure with --with-pydebug does NOT define Py_DEBUG in pyconfig.h. Defining it in pyconfig.h got me past the undefined reference to `_PyUnicode_CheckConsistency' error, but i'm now getting this: if test $? -ne 0 ; then \ echo generate-posix-vars failed ; \ rm -f ./pybuilddir.txt ; \ exit 1 ; \ fi Debug memory block at address p=0x90b7b0: API '' 2416312320 bytes originally requested The 3 pad bytes at p-3 are not all FORBIDDENBYTE (0xfb): at p-3: 0x00 *** OUCH at p-2: 0x00 *** OUCH at p-1: 0x00 *** OUCH Because memory is corrupted at the start, the count of bytes requested may be bogus, and checking the trailing pad bytes may segfault. The 4 pad bytes at tail=0x9096b7b0 are Segmentation fault generate-posix-vars failed make: *** [pybuilddir.txt] Error 1 Will re-check patch application and try again -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23496 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23496 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23496 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23496 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23496 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23496 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24536] os.pipe() should return a structsequence (or namedtuple.)
Jonathan Slenders added the comment: Niki Spahiev made a valid argument saying that the following code is common: if not hasattr(src, 'read'): src = open(src) This will break if we name it 'read'/'write' like the methods of a file object. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24536 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23496] Steps for Android Native Build of Python 3.4.2
Ryan Gonzalez added the comment: On June 30, 2015 8:14:34 AM CDT, Cyd Haselton rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: Cyd Haselton added the comment: Your question about -fPIE brings up a question: How should the differences between Android 5 and previous versions be handled in regards to this issue? Other than mandatory -fPIE, there are changes to Android[s libc that may make patches for python on Android 4.x incompatible with Android 5. WHAT??? :( I can't find a list anywhere; how do you know? Thoughts? Not really... On June 29, 2015 9:29:35 AM CDT, Cyd Haselton rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: Cyd Haselton added the comment: No...haven't upgraded to Android 5.0 yet. On June 29, 2015 9:00:01 AM CDT, Ryan Gonzalez rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: Ryan Gonzalez added the comment: You compiled with -fPIE and GCC, right? I know the Android Clang seems broken. On June 29, 2015 7:09:25 AM CDT, Cyd Haselton rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: Cyd Haselton added the comment: FYI, Figured out that running ./configure with --with-pydebug does NOT define Py_DEBUG in pyconfig.h. Defining it in pyconfig.h got me past the undefined reference to `_PyUnicode_CheckConsistency' error, but i'm now getting this: if test $? -ne 0 ; then \ echo generate-posix-vars failed ; \ rm -f ./pybuilddir.txt ; \ exit 1 ; \ fi Debug memory block at address p=0x90b7b0: API '' 2416312320 bytes originally requested The 3 pad bytes at p-3 are not all FORBIDDENBYTE (0xfb): at p-3: 0x00 *** OUCH at p-2: 0x00 *** OUCH at p-1: 0x00 *** OUCH Because memory is corrupted at the start, the count of bytes requested may be bogus, and checking the trailing pad bytes may segfault. The 4 pad bytes at tail=0x9096b7b0 are Segmentation fault generate-posix-vars failed make: *** [pybuilddir.txt] Error 1 Will re-check patch application and try again -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23496 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23496 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23496 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23496 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23496 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24294] DeprecationWarnings should be visible by default in the interactive REPL
Matthias Bussonnier added the comment: Note that I've signed the CLA, and it has been taken into account, as now I have a small star agains my name (if it was the limiting factor, we never know). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24294 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24536] os.pipe() should return a structsequence (or namedtuple.)
Ethan Furman added the comment: 'read'/'write' is sufficient. +1 for the proposal. -- nosy: +ethan.furman ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24536 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24528] Misleading exeption for await in comprehensions.
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 30b676e8b21f by Yury Selivanov in branch '3.5': Issue #24528: Improve error message for awaits in comprehensions https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/30b676e8b21f New changeset 9598bc916186 by Yury Selivanov in branch 'default': Merge 3.5 (Issue #24528) https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/9598bc916186 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24528 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24528] Misleading exeption for await in comprehensions.
Changes by Yury Selivanov yseliva...@gmail.com: -- resolution: - fixed stage: patch review - resolved status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24528 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24534] disable executing code in .pth files
Marc-Andre Lemburg added the comment: On 30.06.2015 20:52, Min RK wrote: Thanks for the feedback, I thought it might be a long shot. I will go back to removing the *use* of the feature everywhere I can find it, since it is so problematic and rarely, if ever, desirable. Could you please post an example of where the feature is problematic ? it's an essential feature that has been documented for a very long time https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/site.html The entirety of the documentation of this feature appears to be this sentence on that page: Lines starting with import (followed by space or tab) are executed. Yep, but it's enough to be in active use. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24534 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24534] disable executing code in .pth files
Min RK added the comment: Could you please post an example of where the feature is problematic ? setuptools/easy_install is the major one, which effectively does `sys.path[:0] = pth_contents`, breaking import priority. This has been known to result in adding `/usr/lib/pythonX.Y/dist-packages` to the front of sys.path, having higher priority that the stdlib or `--user` -installed packages (I helped a user deal with a completely broken installation that was a result of exactly this last week). The result can often be that `pip list` doesn't accurately describe the versions of packages that are imported. It also causes `pip install -e` to result in completely different import priority from `pip install`, which doesn't use easy-install.pth. Removing the code execution from `easy-install.pth` solves all of these problems. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24534 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24534] disable executing code in .pth files
Min RK added the comment: Thanks for the feedback, I thought it might be a long shot. I will go back to removing the *use* of the feature everywhere I can find it, since it is so problematic and rarely, if ever, desirable. it's an essential feature that has been documented for a very long time https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/site.html The entirety of the documentation of this feature appears to be this sentence on that page: Lines starting with import (followed by space or tab) are executed. No explanation or examples are given, nor any reasoning about the feature or why one might use it. This change will basically break all Python applications This surprises me. Can you elaborate? I have not seen an application rely on executing code in .pth files. If you believe that we can smoothly move to a world without .pth files, you should propose an overall plan, step by step. I have no desire to remove .pth files. .pth files are a fine way to add locations to sys.path. It's .pth files *executing arbitrary code* that's the problem, very surprising, and a source of many errors (especially how it is used in setuptools). -- resolution: - rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24534 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24540] Documentation about skipkeys parameter for json.dumps is incorrect
New submission from Matthew Havard: The documentation from json.dumps says this about skipkeys: If ``skipkeys`` is false then ``dict`` keys that are not basic types (``str``, ``int``, ``float``, ``bool``, ``None``) will be skipped instead of raising a ``TypeError``. However, that contradicts the docstrings for JSONEncoder in the encoder.py file, and json.dump in the same file, __init__.py: json.dump: If ``skipkeys`` is true then ``dict`` keys that are not basic types (``str``, ``int``, ``float``, ``bool``, ``None``) will be skipped instead of raising a ``TypeError``. JSONEncoder: If skipkeys is false, then it is a TypeError to attempt encoding of keys that are not str, int, long, float or None. If skipkeys is True, such items are simply skipped. So the fix is just that the word false to true. -- messages: 245997 nosy: Matthew Havard priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Documentation about skipkeys parameter for json.dumps is incorrect versions: Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24540 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24532] asyncio.sock_recv() blocks normal ioloop actions.
STINNER Victor added the comment: Le lundi 29 juin 2015, Yury Selivanov rep...@bugs.python.org a écrit : You should develop using asyncio debug mode: Maybe we should promote this check to the production mode? asyncio must be slow. The check has a cost, I prefer to keep it only in debug mode. It's probably more a doc issue. We should maybe repeat the info at the beginning of the asyncio doc. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24532 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24259] tar.extractall() does not recognize unexpected EOF
Lars Gustäbel added the comment: Martin, I followed your suggestion to raise ReadError. This needed an additional change in copyfileobj() because it is used both for adding file data to an archive and extracting file data from an archive. But I think the patch is in good shape now. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39837/issue24259-3.x-3.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24259 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24537] Py_Initialize unable to load the file system codec
New submission from Dana Christen: I'm using the C API to embed the Python interpreter (see the attached example). Everything works fine until I try to run the resulting executable on a machine without a Python installation. In that case, the call to Py_Initialize fails with the following message: Fatal Python error: Py_Initialize: unable to load the file system codec ImportError: No module named 'encodings' This was on Windows 7 64 bit, and the program was compiled using MS Visual Studio 2010 in x64 Release mode, using the official Python 3.4.3 64 bit release (v3.4.3:9b73f1c3e601). -- components: Extension Modules files: python_api_hello.c messages: 245984 nosy: Dana Christen priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Py_Initialize unable to load the file system codec type: crash versions: Python 3.4 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39838/python_api_hello.c ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24537 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24400] Awaitable ABC incompatible with functools.singledispatch
Yury Selivanov added the comment: isawaitable(), however, should continue using abc.Awaitable, since it only checks for __await__ presence on the type (or should we just drop it?) I'd really remove it. It's not referring to an actual type, so it doesn't fit the purpose of the inspect module. The fact that the only place where collections.abc is used in this module is in isawaitable() should be a clear indication that it's misplaced. +1. I added 'isawaitable()' before we decided to add ABCs, and now it is redundant (and we don't have isiterable, ishashable etc) Ben, I saw that you're using isawaitable() in tornado, but it looks like you can easily switch the code to use Awaitable ABC, right? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24400 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24534] disable executing code in .pth files
Min RK added the comment: Just because a feature can be misused doesn't make it a bad feature. That's fair. I'm just not aware of any uses of this feature that aren't misuses, hence the patch. Perhaps you could submit a fix for this to the setuptools maintainers instead. Yes, that's definite the right thing to do, and in fact the first thing I did. It looks like that patch is likely to be merged; it is certainly much less disruptive. That's where I started, then I decided to bring it up to Python itself after reading up on the exploited feature, as it seemed to me like a feature with no use other than misuse. Thanks for your time. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24534 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [issue24534] disable executing code in .pth files
On 01.07.2015 00:16, Min RK wrote: Just because a feature can be misused doesn't make it a bad feature. That's fair. I'm just not aware of any uses of this feature that aren't misuses, hence the patch. I don't remember the details of why this feature was added, but can imagine that it was supposed to enable installation of new importers via .pth files. Without this feature it would not be possible to add entries to sys.path via .pth files which can only be handled by non-standard importers. Perhaps you could submit a fix for this to the setuptools maintainers instead. Yes, that's definite the right thing to do, and in fact the first thing I did. It looks like that patch is likely to be merged; it is certainly much less disruptive. That's where I started, then I decided to bring it up to Python itself after reading up on the exploited feature, as it seemed to me like a feature with no use other than misuse. Thanks, that's certainly a good way forward :-) -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24535] SELinux reporting writes, executes, and dac_overwrites
Nick Levinson added the comment: Thank you. I didn't know enough to understand the relevance of blueman. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24535 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24534] disable executing code in .pth files
Marc-Andre Lemburg added the comment: On 30.06.2015 22:49, Min RK wrote: Could you please post an example of where the feature is problematic ? setuptools/easy_install is the major one, which effectively does `sys.path[:0] = pth_contents`, breaking import priority. This has been known to result in adding `/usr/lib/pythonX.Y/dist-packages` to the front of sys.path, having higher priority that the stdlib or `--user` -installed packages (I helped a user deal with a completely broken installation that was a result of exactly this last week). The result can often be that `pip list` doesn't accurately describe the versions of packages that are imported. It also causes `pip install -e` to result in completely different import priority from `pip install`, which doesn't use easy-install.pth. Removing the code execution from `easy-install.pth` solves all of these problems. Ok, so you regard the way that setuptools uses the feature as problematic. I'm sure some people will agree (including myself), but this is not a good reason to remove the feature altogether. Just because a feature can be misused doesn't make it a bad feature. Otherwise, we'd have quite a few things we'd have to remove from Python :-) I'd suggest to try to fix the setuptools uses of the feature instead - in a way that doesn't break all setuptools installations, of course. Perhaps you could submit a fix for this to the setuptools maintainers instead. Thanks, -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24534 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24400] Awaitable ABC incompatible with functools.singledispatch
Ben Darnell added the comment: Yes, I can switch use the ABC instead, and I agree that it doesn't make sense to have the inspect method if it's going to be equivalent to the ABC. I'm happy with the outcome here but AFAIK the original issue still stands: the Awaitable ABC is unusual in that `isinstance(x, Awaitable)` may produce different results than `issubclass(x.__class__, Awaitable)`. I'd like to see more explicit documentation of the facts that A) functools.singledispatch is not always equivalent to isinstance() and B) Awaitable is one case (the only one in the stdlib?) where this distinction occurs. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24400 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24400] Awaitable ABC incompatible with functools.singledispatch
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset e20c197f19d6 by Yury Selivanov in branch '3.5': Issue #24400: Remove inspect.isawaitable(). https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/e20c197f19d6 New changeset 800bf6a0e0d5 by Yury Selivanov in branch 'default': Merge 3.5 (Issue #24400) https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/800bf6a0e0d5 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24400 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
