[issue1138] Fixer needed for __future__ imports
Changes by Christian Heimes: -- keywords: +py3k versions: +Python 3.0 __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1138 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1034] [patch] Add 2to3 support for displaying warnings as Python comments
Changes by Christian Heimes: -- keywords: +py3k versions: +Python 3.0 __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1034 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1755179] Deadlocks with fork() and multithreading
Christian Heimes added the comment: It sounds like the importer dead lock problem. These problems are almost impossible to unit test because they are usually race conditions. I don't see a problem in moving the import to the module name space. errno is a built-in module and the import isn't costly. -- nosy: +tiran _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1755179 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1746656] IPv6 Interface naming/indexing functions
Christian Heimes added the comment: How do you know that the patch is working when you don't know how to test it? Nobody is going to apply new features without unit tests. -- nosy: +tiran _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1746656 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue765228] Subclassing from Modules
Christian Heimes added the comment: I agree. Python can't stop the developer from doing stupid things. We could remove Py_TPFLAGS_BASETYPE from the module type but that could cause incompatibilities with existing code. I'm assigning the bug to our beloved dictator to ask for his opinion. -- assignee: - gvanrossum nosy: +gvanrossum, tiran resolution: - wont fix status: open - pending Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue765228 ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1767787] MSVC++8 x86 tkinter build patch for trunk
Christian Heimes added the comment: I've fixed the builds a while ago. -- nosy: +tiran resolution: - fixed status: open - closed _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1767787 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1189216] zipfile module and 2G boundary
Changes by Christian Heimes: -- components: +Library (Lib) -None versions: +Python 2.6, Python 3.0 _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1189216 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1731068] Importing a submodule fails after unloading its parent
Christian Heimes added the comment: Yes, it's fixed in Python 2.5 and newer. -- nosy: +tiran resolution: - out of date status: open - closed _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1731068 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1620174] Improve platform.py usability on Windows
Changes by Christian Heimes: -- components: +Library (Lib) -None versions: +Python 2.6 _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1620174 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1735632] Add O_NOATIME to os module
Changes by Christian Heimes: -- versions: +Python 2.6, Python 3.0 _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1735632 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1230540] sys.excepthook doesn't work in threads
Changes by Christian Heimes: -- versions: +Python 2.5, Python 2.6 -Python 2.4 _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1230540 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1490] Bug in eval() function
Martin v. Löwis added the comment: Why do you think this is a bug? 08 really is a syntax error, and 010 really means 8. -- nosy: +loewis resolution: - invalid status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1490 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1675455] Use getaddrinfo() in urllib2.py for IPv6 support
Changes by Christian Heimes: -- versions: +Python 2.6, Python 3.0 _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1675455 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1269] Exception in pstats print_callers()
Thomas Herve added the comment: 1315 is a duplicate of this, and I end up with a very similar solution. -- nosy: +therve __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1269 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1315] Bug in pstats.print_callers
Thomas Herve added the comment: The real bug is in fact in add_callers, where it concatenates tuples instead of adding the values. I'll try to write a test this week-end if nobody beats me to it. The attached is against current trunk. -- nosy: +therve Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file8797/1315.diff __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1315 __Index: Lib/pstats.py === --- Lib/pstats.py (revision 59136) +++ Lib/pstats.py (working copy) @@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ new_callers[func] = caller for func, caller in source.iteritems(): if func in new_callers: -new_callers[func] = caller + new_callers[func] +new_callers[func] = tuple([i[0] + i[1] for i in zip(caller, new_callers[func])]) else: new_callers[func] = caller return new_callers ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1474] PCbuild9 patch for trunk
Changes by Christian Heimes: -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1474 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1402] Interpreter cleanup: order of _PyGILState_Fini and PyInterpreterState_Clear
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc added the comment: I managed to reproduce the problem consistently with the following code: import ctypes, sys, time, thread # Module globals are cleared before __del__ is run # So save the functions in class dict class C: ensure = ctypes.pythonapi.PyGILState_Ensure release = ctypes.pythonapi.PyGILState_Release def __del__(self): state = self.ensure() self.release(state) def waitingThread(): x = C() time.sleep(100) thread.start_new_thread(waitingThread, ()) time.sleep(1) sys.exit(42) On exit, PyInterpreterState_Clear stops the sleeping thread and free its local variables. But at this time _PyGILState_Fini has already been called... The initial patch also corrects this problem. I join another patch, which adds the above code in a testcase. Ready to check-in, but can someone have a look? -- nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file8798/test_gilstate.patch __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1402 __ test_gilstate.patch Description: Binary data ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1488] PCBuild9 _ssl.vcproj improperly launches build
Changes by Christian Heimes: -- status: pending - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1488 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1488] PCBuild9 _ssl.vcproj improperly launches build
Joseph Armbruster added the comment: Looks like the libpaths were pointing to out32 instead of out32.dll. Although that may have been due to my switch from nt.mak to ntdll.mak. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1488 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1492] BaseHTTPServer hard-codes Content-Type for error messages
Changes by samwyse: -- components: +Library (Lib) type: - behavior versions: +Python 2.4, Python 2.5, Python 2.6, Python 3.0 __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1492 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1620174] Improve platform.py usability on Windows
Marc-Andre Lemburg added the comment: Rejecting the patch, since it hasn't been updated. -- resolution: - rejected status: open - closed _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1620174 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1754273] Deprecation warning for (NOTEQUAL)
Christian Heimes added the comment: Applied in r59132 Thanks! -- nosy: +tiran resolution: - fixed status: open - closed _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1754273 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1315] Bug in pstats.print_callers
Thomas Herve added the comment: Oh I didn't see, but this one should probably closed as duplicate of 1269. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1315 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1486] Idle tab command completion
Grant Delaney added the comment: You can remove this issue. It was a compile problem on my side, missing libs etc. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1486 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1754271] Deprecation warning for `backticks`
Christian Heimes added the comment: Applied in r59132 Thanks! -- nosy: +tiran resolution: - fixed status: open - closed _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1754271 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1491] BaseHTTPServer incorrectly implements response code 100
New submission from samwyse:
RFC 2616 sec 8.2.3 states, An origin server that sends a 100 (Continue)
response MUST ultimately send a final status code, once the request body
is received and processed, unless it terminates the transport connection
prematurely. The obvious way to do this is to invoke the
'send_response' method twice, once with a code of 100, then with the
final code. However, BaseHTTPServer will always send two headers
('Server' and 'Date') when it send a response. One possible fix is to
add an option to the method to suppress sending headers; another is to
add the following code to the 'send_response' method, immediately prior
to the calls to 'self.send_header':
if code == 100:
return
The more paranoid among us may wish to use this code instead:
if code == 100:
expectation = self.headers.get('Expect', )
if expectation.lower() == '100-continue':
return
--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 57783
nosy: samwyse
severity: normal
status: open
title: BaseHTTPServer incorrectly implements response code 100
type: behavior
versions: Python 2.4, Python 2.5, Python 2.6, Python 3.0
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1491
__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1492] BaseHTTPServer hard-codes Content-Type for error messages
New submission from samwyse: The send_error method always sends a Content-Type of 'text/html'. Other content types are both possible and desirable. For example, someone writing a REST server might wish to send XML error messages. Following the example of DEFAULT_ERROR_MESSAGE, I propose adding the following in the appropriate places: 91a92,94 # Default error content-type DEFAULT_ERROR_TYPE = 'text/html' 345c348 self.send_header(Content-Type, text/html) --- self.send_header(Content-Type, error_message_type) 351a355 error_message_type = DEFAULT_ERROR_TYPE -- messages: 57784 nosy: samwyse severity: normal status: open title: BaseHTTPServer hard-codes Content-Type for error messages __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1492 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1488] PCBuild9 _ssl.vcproj improperly launches build
Joseph Armbruster added the comment: Whoops. This may have been an error on my part. nt.mak I think bombed for me except it was probably due to some of my tinkering. My apologies. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1488 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1429818] trace.py needs to know about doctests
Skip Montanaro added the comment: Applied in r59317 (trunk) and r59318 (release25-maint). -- assignee: - skip.montanaro nosy: +skip.montanaro resolution: - accepted status: open - closed _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1429818 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1486] Idle tab command completion
Facundo Batista added the comment: Rejected as requested by the OP. -- resolution: - rejected status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1486 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1256] subprocess Popen wait() function hangs when stdout is 20480
Ivan Pozdeev added the comment: I suggest adding this as a note to the subprocess module documentation instead. The 17.1.2 Popen Objects section seems to be the right place. -- nosy: +Vano __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1256 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1409] new keyword-only function parameters interact badly with nested functions
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc added the comment: Corrected as r59155. Thanks for the report! -- nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc resolution: - fixed status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1409 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1770416] Decimal.__int__ overflows for large values
Facundo Batista added the comment: This was fixed at the same time than issue 1772851. int(D(1e1234567890987654321)) stills take too long, but this is fault of doing 10**1234567890987654321 to convert it to an int. Note that hash(D(1e1234567890987654321)) is fast now. -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1770416 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1493] Patch to remove unbound methods
New submission from Christian Heimes:
Here is a first patch to remove unbound method objects.
6 tests failed:
test_descr test_inspect test_pyclbr test_typechecks test_unittest
test_weakref
--
assignee: gvanrossum
components: Interpreter Core
files: py3k_remove_unbound.patch
keywords: patch, py3k
messages: 57798
nosy: gvanrossum, tiran
priority: high
severity: normal
status: open
title: Patch to remove unbound methods
type: rfe
versions: Python 3.0
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file8799/py3k_remove_unbound.patch
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1493
__Index: Objects/funcobject.c
===
--- Objects/funcobject.c (Revision 59163)
+++ Objects/funcobject.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -643,8 +643,10 @@
static PyObject *
func_descr_get(PyObject *func, PyObject *obj, PyObject *type)
{
- if (obj == Py_None)
- obj = NULL;
+ if (obj == Py_None || obj == NULL) {
+ Py_INCREF(func);
+ return func;
+ }
return PyMethod_New(func, obj, type);
}
Index: Lib/DocXMLRPCServer.py
===
--- Lib/DocXMLRPCServer.py (Revision 59163)
+++ Lib/DocXMLRPCServer.py (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
title = 'a name=%sstrong%s/strong/a' % (anchor, name)
if inspect.ismethod(object):
-args, varargs, varkw, defaults = inspect.getargspec(object.im_func)
+args, varargs, varkw, defaults = inspect.getargspec(object)
# exclude the argument bound to the instance, it will be
# confusing to the non-Python user
argspec = inspect.formatargspec (
Index: Lib/test/test_extcall.py
===
--- Lib/test/test_extcall.py (Revision 59163)
+++ Lib/test/test_extcall.py (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -231,18 +231,8 @@
x = Foo()
print(Foo.method(*(x, 1, 2)))
print(Foo.method(x, *(1, 2)))
-try:
-print(Foo.method(*(1, 2, 3)))
-except TypeError as err:
-pass
-else:
-print('expected a TypeError for unbound method call')
-try:
-print(Foo.method(1, *(2, 3)))
-except TypeError as err:
-pass
-else:
-print('expected a TypeError for unbound method call')
+print(Foo.method(*(1, 2, 3)))
+print(Foo.method(1, *(2, 3)))
# A PyCFunction that takes only positional parameters should allow an
# empty keyword dictionary to pass without a complaint, but raise a
Index: Lib/test/test_repr.py
===
--- Lib/test/test_repr.py (Revision 59163)
+++ Lib/test/test_repr.py (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -280,8 +280,8 @@
''')
from areallylongpackageandmodulenametotestreprtruncation.areallylongpackageandmodulenametotestreprtruncation import qux
# Unbound methods first
-eq(repr(qux..amethod),
-'unbound method .amethod')
+self.failUnless(repr(qux..amethod).startswith(
+'function amethod'))
# Bound method next
iqux = qux.()
self.failUnless(repr(iqux.amethod).startswith(
Index: Lib/test/test_descrtut.py
===
--- Lib/test/test_descrtut.py (Revision 59163)
+++ Lib/test/test_descrtut.py (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -444,9 +444,7 @@
... B.foo(self)
C().foo()
-Traceback (most recent call last):
- ...
-TypeError: unbound method foo() must be called with B instance as first argument (got C instance instead)
+called A.foo()
class C(A):
... def foo(self):
Index: Lib/test/test_descr.py
===
--- Lib/test/test_descr.py (Revision 59163)
+++ Lib/test/test_descr.py (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -280,12 +280,12 @@
c = C()
vereq(interesting(dir(c)), cstuff)
-verify('im_self' in dir(C.Cmethod))
+#verify('im_self' in dir(C.Cmethod))
c.cdata = 2
c.cmethod = lambda self: 0
vereq(interesting(dir(c)), cstuff + ['cdata', 'cmethod'])
-verify('im_self' in dir(c.Cmethod))
+#verify('im_self' in dir(c.Cmethod))
class A(C):
Adata = 1
@@ -293,13
