[issue1883] Adapt pydoc to new doc system

2008-04-24 Thread Humberto Diogenes
Humberto Diogenes [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: It looks like there are no automated tests for pydoc; it's even listed in test_sundry.py. There's only one file Lib/test/pydocfodder.py which defines Something just to look at via pydoc, but isn't used anywhere (I grepped and found

[issue1883] Adapt pydoc to new doc system

2008-04-24 Thread Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: It's not a difference between versions, but a difference between old-style and new-style classes (which derive from object). In 3.0, all classes are new-style... -- nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc __

[issue2677] Argument rules in callables do not apply when function uses PyArg_ParseTuple

2008-04-24 Thread Ludovico Gardenghi
New submission from Ludovico Gardenghi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: (It seems strange to me that this issue hasn't been raised in the past, maybe I just failed to find it in the BTS. In that case please excuse me and please point me to the original discussion.) The Language Reference, section 5.3.4,

[issue2677] Argument rules for callables do not apply when function implementation uses PyArg_ParseTuple

2008-04-24 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I fail to see the problem. The open function really doesn't have a named parameter called flags; the positional parameters are unnamed. So there is no violation of the language reference, AFAICT. Perhaps it would be useful to point out that

[issue2677] Argument rules for callables do not apply when function implementation uses PyArg_ParseTuple

2008-04-24 Thread Ludovico Gardenghi
Changes by Ludovico Gardenghi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- title: Argument rules in callables do not apply when function uses PyArg_ParseTuple - Argument rules for callables do not apply when function implementation uses PyArg_ParseTuple __ Tracker [EMAIL

[issue2677] Argument rules for callables do not apply when function implementation uses PyArg_ParseTuple

2008-04-24 Thread Ludovico Gardenghi
Ludovico Gardenghi [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I'd believe you when you say positional parameters are unnamed, but: - the language reference contains terms such as first formal parameter name. This means that positional parameters *may* have a name but may also have no name? - if you

[issue2677] Argument rules for callables do not apply when function implementation uses PyArg_ParseTuple

2008-04-24 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I'd believe you when you say positional parameters are unnamed, but: - the language reference contains terms such as first formal parameter name. This means that positional parameters *may* have a name but may also have no name? Correct

[issue2677] Argument rules for callables do not apply when function implementation uses PyArg_ParseTuple

2008-04-24 Thread Ludovico Gardenghi
Ludovico Gardenghi [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: You are not completely wrong. It's just that this detail is something most people recognize at some point and accept as a fact, regardless of what the language specification says (and, as I claim, that text isn't incorrect - or the

[issue2677] Argument rules for callables do not apply when function implementation uses PyArg_ParseTuple

2008-04-24 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Maybe yes, the easier but probably harmless solution is to change the documentation and point out that in general, you can't. Maybe this somehow leans towards promoting a bug to the rank of feature? ;-) The language spec is stuck between

[issue2677] Argument rules for callables do not apply when function implementation uses PyArg_ParseTuple

2008-04-24 Thread Ludovico Gardenghi
Ludovico Gardenghi [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: At present, unspecified is surely better than you can't, that's a good point. I understand the difficulties of balancing the reference between the abstract definition and the actual implementation. But I still believe that this should not

[issue2677] Argument rules for callables do not apply when function implementation uses PyArg_ParseTuple

2008-04-24 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Making it a documentation issue; I don't think the implementation should change. Georg, if you don't see the need for action, feel free to close it. -- assignee: - georg.brandl components: +Documentation -Library (Lib) nosy:

[issue2678] hmac performance optimization

2008-04-24 Thread Nikolay Kim
New submission from Nikolay Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED]: i removed lambda in _strxor function -- components: Library (Lib) files: hmac.py.diff keywords: patch messages: 65720 nosy: fafhrd severity: normal status: open title: hmac performance optimization type: performance versions: Python 2.5

[issue2650] re.escape should not escape underscore

2008-04-24 Thread Russ Cox
Russ Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: The loop in escape should really use enumerate instead of for i in range(len(pattern)). It needs i to edit s[i]. Instead of using a loop, can't the test just use self.assertEqual(re.esacpe(same), same)? Done. Also, please add tests for

[issue2679] email.feedparser regex duplicate

2008-04-24 Thread Jim Jewett
New submission from Jim Jewett [EMAIL PROTECTED]: feedparser defines four regexs for end-of-line, but two are redundant. NLCRE checks for the three common line endings. NLCRE_crack also captures the line ending. NLCRE_eol also adds a $ to ensure it is at the end. NLCRE_bol ... is identical to

[issue1496032] test_float segfaults with SIGFPE on FreeBSD 6.0 / Alpha

2008-04-24 Thread Mark Dickinson
Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: There are some current math and cmath test failures on the Debian alpha buildbots (2.6 and 3.0), and I think there's a good possibility that adding -mieee to BASECFLAGS would fix these. I'm struggling to find the right way to do this in

[issue2636] Regexp 2.6 (modifications to current re 2.2.2)

2008-04-24 Thread Jim Jewett
Jim Jewett [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: These features are to bring the Regexp code closer in line with Perl 5.10 Why 5.1 instead of 5.8 or at least 5.6? Is it just a scope-creep issue? as well as add a few python-specific because this also adds to the scope. 2) Make named

[issue2636] Regexp 2.6 (modifications to current re 2.2.2)

2008-04-24 Thread Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: These features are to bring the Regexp code closer in line with Perl 5.10 Why 5.1 instead of 5.8 or at least 5.6? Is it just a scope-creep issue? 5.10.0 comes after 5.8 and is the latest version (2007/12/18)! Yes it is

[issue2636] Regexp 2.6 (modifications to current re 2.2.2)

2008-04-24 Thread Jeffrey C. Jacobs
Jeffrey C. Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Thanks Jim for your thoughts! Armaury has already explained about Perl 5.10.0. I suppose it's like Macintosh version numbering, since Mac Tiger went from version 10.4.9 to 10.4.10 and 10.4.11 a few years ago. Maybe we should call Python

[issue2680] gotcha: _fields_ is final but accepts lists

2008-04-24 Thread Carlos Scheidegger
New submission from Carlos Scheidegger [EMAIL PROTECTED]: When creating ctypes.Structure classes dynamically, there's a gotcha. _fields_ is final, but it takes a list that can be appended to. I'm not sure this is a bug, but I would argue it is a lot more surprising than it could be: Python

[issue2681] octal literals beginning with 8 don't raise a SyntaxError

2008-04-24 Thread Lukas Meuser
New submission from Lukas Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Octal literals containing an 8 or a 9 should raise a SyntaxError, but 8 ist accepted as the first character of such a literal (e.g., 0o8 or 0o876, but not 0o678). Those literals evaluate to 0.0. The fix for this is trivial, a patch against

[issue2680] gotcha: _fields_ is final but accepts lists

2008-04-24 Thread Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: The __slots__ member of a class object has the same behavior. You may mutate it (even replace it) but this has no effect: only the value available when the class statement was executed is relevant. -- nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc

[issue2681] octal literals beginning with 8 don't raise a SyntaxError

2008-04-24 Thread Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Corrected as r62480. I changed your patch a little bit: it seemed more logical to use (c '0' || c = '8') As it is the exact counterpart of ('0' = c c '8') used a few lines below. Thanks for the report! -- nosy:

[issue2680] gotcha: _fields_ is final but accepts lists

2008-04-24 Thread Thomas Heller
Thomas Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: The __slots__ member of a class object has the same behavior. You may mutate it (even replace it) but this has no effect: only the value available when the class statement was executed is relevant. The rules in ctypes are a little bit more

[issue2655] Create ctypes instances from buffer interface

2008-04-24 Thread Thomas Heller
Thomas Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: The suggestion by Lenard Lindstrom was an additional method named 'from_buffer_copy'. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2655 __

[issue2672] speed of set.update(

2008-04-24 Thread John Arbash Meinel
John Arbash Meinel [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alexander Belopolsky wrote: Alexander Belopolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: This has nothing to do with set.update, the difference is due to the time to setup the generator: $

[issue2636] Regexp 2.6 (modifications to current re 2.2.2)

2008-04-24 Thread Jim Jewett
Jim Jewett [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Python 2.6 isn't the last, but Guido has said that there won't be a 2.10. Match object is a C-struct with python binding and I'm not exactly sure how to add either feature to it I may be misunderstanding -- isn't this just a matter of writing

[issue2682] cyclic reference in ctypes CFunctionType objects

2008-04-24 Thread Thomas Heller
New submission from Thomas Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Zachary Pincus posted a message about this cyclic reference in ctypes CFunctionType objects. The reference has the problem that these objects are cleaned up later than expected. The attached patch fixes this problem by removing the cyclic

[issue2682] cyclic reference in ctypes CFunctionType objects

2008-04-24 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Can you please elaborate your (apparent) concerns about this patch? IOW, why did you not check it in? -- nosy: +loewis __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2682

[issue2680] gotcha: _fields_ is final but accepts lists

2008-04-24 Thread Thomas Heller
Thomas Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Closing as won't fix. -- resolution: - wont fix status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2680 __

[issue2682] cyclic reference in ctypes CFunctionType objects

2008-04-24 Thread Thomas Heller
Thomas Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Can you please elaborate your (apparent) concerns about this patch? IOW, why did you not check it in? I have no concerns about the patch, and I am currently committing it. I'm uploading so that I can points others to it, and (hopefully) to

[issue2682] cyclic reference in ctypes CFunctionType objects

2008-04-24 Thread Thomas Heller
Thomas Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Fixed in trunk and py3k, committed as rev 62481 (trunk), rev 62484 (py3k). I'll leave this open until the decision about backporting to release25-maint is made. -- resolution: - accepted __ Tracker

[issue2672] speed of set.update(

2008-04-24 Thread Alexander Belopolsky
Alexander Belopolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 2:23 PM, John Arbash Meinel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: .. So if you compare consuming a generator multiple times to creating it each time, it is 0.662 usec - 0.173 usec = 0.489 usec to create a generator. So

[issue2683] subprocess.Popen.communicate takes bytes, not str

2008-04-24 Thread Lenard Lindstrom
New submission from Lenard Lindstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]: subprocess.Popen.communicate is documented as taking a string as the input argument. Instead is accepts only a binary stream (bytes). Python 3.0a4 (r30a4:62126, Apr 3 2008, 15:34:18) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 Type help,

[issue2684] Logging Module still failing for %(filename)s, __init__

2008-04-24 Thread Charles Merriam
New submission from Charles Merriam [EMAIL PROTECTED]: About same as problem in 2.4 Issue1470422 closed without a test case on MacOS X/Python 2.4. Also same as http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-bugs-list/2004-July/024111.html and so on back for years. What happens: [EMAIL

[issue2684] Logging Module still failing for %(filename)s, __init__

2008-04-24 Thread Charles Merriam
Charles Merriam [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: oops, last line should be exits the stack frames for the logging module. This should be a once-per-program-execution event Hmm.. tracker should have a preview button. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[issue2471] imp.get_magic() should return bytes, not bytearray

2008-04-24 Thread Benjamin Peterson
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: This was fixed as r62484. -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2471 __

[issue2471] imp.get_magic() should return bytes, not bytearray

2008-04-24 Thread Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Oops, sorry for missing the tracker item. The change was sleeping in my workspace for some time... Thanks for closing it. -- nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[issue799428] tk_focusNext() fails

2008-04-24 Thread Guilherme Polo
Changes by Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file9938/bugfix_and_revamp_nametowidget.diff Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue799428

[issue799428] tk_focusNext() fails

2008-04-24 Thread Guilherme Polo
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: There was a problem with my previous patch if the widget name was just '.' New patch attached Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10087/bugfix_and_revamp_nametowidget.diff Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[issue799428] tk_focusNext() fails

2008-04-24 Thread Guilherme Polo
Changes by Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file10087/bugfix_and_revamp_nametowidget.diff Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue799428

[issue799428] tk_focusNext() fails

2008-04-24 Thread Guilherme Polo
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Sorry for the previous patch, correct one attached now Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10088/bugfix_and_revamp_nametowidget.diff Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue799428

[issue2636] Regexp 2.6 (modifications to current re 2.2.2)

2008-04-24 Thread Russ Cox
Changes by Russ Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: +rsc __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2636 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue2537] re.compile(r'((x|y+)*)*') should fail

2008-04-24 Thread Russ Cox
Changes by Russ Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: +rsc __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2537 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue1160] Medium size regexp crashes python

2008-04-24 Thread Russ Cox
Changes by Russ Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: +rsc __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1160 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue1662581] the re module can perform poorly: O(2**n) versus O(n**2)

2008-04-24 Thread Russ Cox
Changes by Russ Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: +rsc _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1662581 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue433030] SRE: Atomic Grouping (?...) is not supported

2008-04-24 Thread Russ Cox
Changes by Russ Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: +rsc Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue433030 ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue1693050] \w not helpful for non-Roman scripts

2008-04-24 Thread Russ Cox
Changes by Russ Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: +rsc _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1693050 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue1883] Adapt pydoc to new doc system

2008-04-24 Thread Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Humberto, I added your test file in trunk. I added some other tests: now pydocfodder.py is used by a basic smoke test. The tests revealed two bugs in python3.0... Thanks! __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[issue1647489] zero-length match confuses re.finditer()

2008-04-24 Thread Russ Cox
Changes by Russ Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: +rsc _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1647489 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue1297193] Search is to long with regex like ^(.+|dontmatch)*$

2008-04-24 Thread Russ Cox
Changes by Russ Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: +rsc _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1297193 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue2685] Add -mieee to compile flags, when available

2008-04-24 Thread Mark Dickinson
New submission from Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: test_math and test_cmath currently fail on Debian/alpha, apparently due to mishandling of subnormal numbers. I have high hopes that this can be fixed by compiling with -mieee. The attached patch modifies the configure script to always use

[issue1721518] Small case which hangs

2008-04-24 Thread Russ Cox
Changes by Russ Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: +rsc _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1721518 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue433024] SRE: (?flag) isn't properly scoped

2008-04-24 Thread Russ Cox
Changes by Russ Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: +rsc Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue433024 ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue2672] speed of set.update(

2008-04-24 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: John, when y=[], the update method has to create a new list iterator on each invocation. But when y is a genexp, it is self-iterable (iow, iter (y) will return self, not a new object). Also, when doing timings, it can be helpful to

[issue2672] speed of set.update(

2008-04-24 Thread John Arbash Meinel
John Arbash Meinel [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Raymond Hettinger wrote: Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: John, when y=[], the update method has to create a new list iterator on each invocation. But when y is a

[issue2686] Any chance we could double the height of the 'Comment:' text area on tracker?

2008-04-24 Thread Trent Nelson
New submission from Trent Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'd give my left arm for the comment box to be at least double its current height. Once you've written more than a paragraph, it becomes a nuisance having to scroll up and down to re-read what you've written before typing more. Quick win?

[issue2686] Any chance we could double the height of the 'Comment:' text area on tracker?

2008-04-24 Thread Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: +1 But you should file this in the Meta-Tracker; click Report Tracker Problem at the bottom of the left bar. -- nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[issue2632] performance problem in socket._fileobject.read

2008-04-24 Thread Gregory P. Smith
Gregory P. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: available for an easy side by side review here: http://codereview.appspot.com/212 Also, yes I think you're right Ralf. With these changes I should be able to return that to a max() within the while True: for sized reads and things will

[issue1376292] Write user's version of RefGuide

2008-04-24 Thread bob gailer
bob gailer [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I find a Reference Manual and a Library Reference. I presume you are referring to the Reference Manual. True? I might be interested in helping create the shorter friendlier guide. I suggest we create some guidelines or specifications for it. This

[issue1376292] Write user's version of

2008-04-24 Thread bob gailer
bob gailer [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: My new email address is bgailer at gmail dot com (not google dot com). Please update your address book, and change the above into the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] The old address will expire at the end of 2008. Bob Gailer in Chapel Hill NC. --

[issue1376292] Write user's version of

2008-04-24 Thread bob gailer
bob gailer [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: My new email address is bgailer at gmail dot com (not google dot com). Please update your address book, and change the above into the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] The old address will expire at the end of 2008. Bob Gailer in Chapel Hill NC. Added file:

[issue1376292] Write user's version of

2008-04-24 Thread bob gailer
bob gailer [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: My new email address is bgailer at gmail dot com (not google dot com). Please update your address book, and change the above into the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] The old address will expire at the end of 2008. Bob Gailer in Chapel Hill NC. Added file:

[issue1376292] Write user's version of

2008-04-24 Thread bob gailer
bob gailer [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: My new email address is bgailer at gmail dot com (not google dot com). Please update your address book, and change the above into the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] The old address will expire at the end of 2008. Bob Gailer in Chapel Hill NC. Added file:

[issue1376292] Write user's version of

2008-04-24 Thread bob gailer
bob gailer [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: My new email address is bgailer at gmail dot com (not google dot com). Please update your address book, and change the above into the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] The old address will expire at the end of 2008. Bob Gailer in Chapel Hill NC. Added file:

[issue1376292] Write user's version of

2008-04-24 Thread bob gailer
bob gailer [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: My new email address is bgailer at gmail dot com (not google dot com). Please update your address book, and change the above into the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] The old address will expire at the end of 2008. Bob Gailer in Chapel Hill NC. Added file:

[issue1376292] Write user's version of

2008-04-24 Thread bob gailer
bob gailer [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: My new email address is bgailer at gmail dot com (not google dot com). Please update your address book, and change the above into the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] The old address will expire at the end of 2008. Bob Gailer in Chapel Hill NC. Added file:

[issue1376292] Write user's version of

2008-04-24 Thread bob gailer
bob gailer [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: My new email address is bgailer at gmail dot com (not google dot com). Please update your address book, and change the above into the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] The old address will expire at the end of 2008. Bob Gailer in Chapel Hill NC. Added file:

[issue1376292] Write user's version of

2008-04-24 Thread bob gailer
bob gailer [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: My new email address is bgailer at gmail dot com (not google dot com). Please update your address book, and change the above into the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] The old address will expire at the end of 2008. Bob Gailer in Chapel Hill NC. Added file:

[issue1376292] Write user's version of

2008-04-24 Thread bob gailer
bob gailer [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: My new email address is bgailer at gmail dot com (not google dot com). Please update your address book, and change the above into the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] The old address will expire at the end of 2008. Bob Gailer in Chapel Hill NC. Added file:

[issue1376292] Write user's version of

2008-04-24 Thread bob gailer
bob gailer [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: My new email address is bgailer at gmail dot com (not google dot com). Please update your address book, and change the above into the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] The old address will expire at the end of 2008. Bob Gailer in Chapel Hill NC. Added file:

[issue1376292] Write user's version of

2008-04-24 Thread bob gailer
bob gailer [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: My new email address is bgailer at gmail dot com (not google dot com). Please update your address book, and change the above into the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] The old address will expire at the end of 2008. Bob Gailer in Chapel Hill NC. Added file:

[issue2687] SSL example script fails mysteriously on MacOS

2008-04-24 Thread A.M. Kuchling
New submission from A.M. Kuchling [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On my MacOS 10.4.11 machine, the example SSL server and client in the documentation don't work, and they fail with a mysterious error 0. The attached tarball contains my slightly-modified version of the scripts and the test key/cert I'm

[issue1496032] test_float segfaults with SIGFPE on FreeBSD 6.0 / Alpha

2008-04-24 Thread Neal Norwitz
Neal Norwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I think `uname -m` will be equal to alpha in this case. There are several uses of `uname -m` in configure.in. You might need to add a new section. It might also be possible to clean up various special cases to make a generic `uname -m`