[issue3016] tarfile.py incurs exception from self.chmod() when tarball has g+s
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I can't reproduce this. If I do py import tarfile py t=tarfile.open(pyOpenSSL-0.6.tar.gz,r:*) py t.extractall() py it extracts just fine, and sets the s-bits. I've used the file at http://downloads.sourceforge.net/pyopenssl/pyOpenSSL-0.6.tar.gz?modtime=1092355200big_mirror=0 -- assignee: - lars.gustaebel nosy: +lars.gustaebel, loewis ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3016 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2849] Remove usage of rfc822 from the stdlib
Humberto Diogenes [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Seems that removing rfc822 from `cgi` is not an easy task -- please see issue 1112856. ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2849 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2898] Add memory footprint query
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: The patch looks fine to me, please apply. Don't forget to add a Misc/NEWS entry. -- assignee: gvanrossum - schuppenies resolution: - accepted ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2898 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2138] Add a factorial function
Joshua Uziel [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Or slightly better: from operator import mul def factorial(num): return reduce(mul, range(2, num+1), 1) ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2138 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2138] Add a factorial function
Joshua Uziel [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: It's a simplified version, but why not something like this: import operator def factorial(num): return reduce(operator.mul, range(1, num+1)) A product() function could also be done similarly. -- nosy: +uzi ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2138 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2982] more tests for pyexpat
Thomas Herve [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I attach a first try adding tests for the handlers you mentioned. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10483/2922.diff ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2982 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3016] tarfile.py incurs exception from self.chmod() when tarball has g+s
Lars Gustäbel [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: With some effort I could reproduce the problem (on a FAT32 filesystem), but what we have here is clearly a usage problem. In unpack_tarfile() in setuptools/archive_util.py TarFile's internal _extract_member() method is used to extract the contents. For every non-fatal error (like a failing chmod()) _extract_member() raises an ExtractError exception. In TarFile.extract() these ExtractErrors are normally ignored. The unpack_tarfile() function in setuptools needs some fixing, it should either act more like TarFile.extract() or better use the public API. -- resolution: - works for me status: open - closed ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3016 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3015] tkinter with wantobjects=False has been broken for some time
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I will agree that wantobjects=False should go, it is also discouraged to use Tcl_GetStringResult because it may lose information. But something should be done at FromObj since it accesses Tcl_Obj fields directly, and it may end up not using the current object representation which may cause weird things like in issue1447222. Said that, I'm not sure how to fix it for now. ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3015 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3017] Verify doc updates for the decimal module
New submission from Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Some of the doc updates were inaccurate. For instance, r58154 adds documentation for a trim() method, but there is no such method in decimal.py. -- assignee: facundobatista components: Documentation messages: 67576 nosy: facundobatista, rhettinger priority: high severity: normal status: open title: Verify doc updates for the decimal module versions: Python 2.6, Python 3.0 ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3017 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3015] tkinter with wantobjects=False has been broken for some time
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I've removed wantobjects and substituted some internalRep usage too. Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10484/remove_wantobjects_internalRep.diff ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3015 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1447222] tkinter Dialog fails when more than four buttons are used
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: This is a workaround and seems to be the way to go. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10485/Dialog_workaround.diff ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1447222 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3018] tkinter demos fixed
New submission from Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I've fixed the tkinter demos at py3k. And excluding the import fixes, most of these could be backported to python 2.x too. -- components: Tkinter files: tkinter_demo_fixes.diff keywords: patch messages: 67579 nosy: gpolo severity: normal status: open title: tkinter demos fixed versions: Python 3.0 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10486/tkinter_demo_fixes.diff ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3018 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3018] tkinter demos fixed
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I forgot to say that some demos weren't fixed by the previous patch, demo/reasons below: guido/ss1rexec is gone guido/MimeViewer can't test it right now guido/mbox can't test it right now guido/ManPagepartly fixed, may contain UnicodeDecodeError issues ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3018 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3010] Module cmd documentation enhancement
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Converted to reST and applied in r63830. Thanks! -- resolution: - accepted status: open - closed ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3010 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3005] EasyDialogs - documentation enhancement
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Thanks, added the sentence in r63831. -- resolution: - accepted status: open - closed ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3005 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2936] ctypes.util.find_library() doesn't consult LD_LIBRARY_PATH
Bill Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Yes, I've read that explanation, but I still don't see what the point of find_library() is. Are you trying to resolve a possibly ambiguous reference to a shared library to the one which is used by the Python interpreter? If that's the case (and that's what the code seems to do), how about calling it find_library_used_by_python, and have another function, perhaps called find_library, which, given a partial name like foo, searches the LD_LIBRARY_PATH (or, on Darwin, the DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH), if set, then the standard system locations, the, on Darwin, the DYLD_FALLBACK_LIBRARY_PATH, to find a library called libfoo.so.N (or, on Darwin, libfoo.N.dylib)? That would be very useful. Right now, I don't see the use case for find_library(). Bill On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Thomas Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thomas Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: The question is, which linker? I think it should be ld.so, which links on demand, and does pay attention to LD_LIBRARY_PATH. I'm not sure what the point of find_library() is, otherwise. The best explanation is in the python docs: http://docs.python.org/lib/ctypes-finding-shared-libraries.html ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2936 ___ Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10487/unnamed ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2936 ___Yes, I#39;ve read that explanation, but I still don#39;t see what the point of find_library() is.nbsp; Are you trying to resolve a possibly ambiguous reference to a shared library to the one which is used by the Python interpreter?nbsp; If that#39;s the case (and that#39;s what the code seems to do), how about calling it quot;find_library_used_by_pythonquot;, and have another function, perhaps called quot;find_libraryquot;, which, given a partial name like quot;fooquot;, searches the LD_LIBRARY_PATH (or, on Darwin, the DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH), if set, then the standard system locations, the, on Darwin, the DYLD_FALLBACK_LIBRARY_PATH, to find a library called quot;libfoo.so.Nquot; (or, on Darwin, quot;libfoo.N.dylibquot;)?nbsp; That would be very useful.nbsp; Right now, I don#39;t see the use case for find_library().br brBillbrbrdiv class=gmail_quoteOn Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Thomas Heller lt;a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]/agt; wrote:brblockquote class=gmail_quote style=border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex; div class=Ih2E3dbr Thomas Heller lt;a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]/agt; added the comment:br br /divdiv class=Ih2E3dgt; The question is, which linker? nbsp;I think it should be ld.so, which links quot;onbr gt; demandquot;, and does pay attention to LD_LIBRARY_PATH. nbsp;I#39;m not sure what thebr gt; point of find_library() is, otherwise.br br /divThe best explanation is in the python docs:br a href=http://docs.python.org/lib/ctypes-finding-shared-libraries.html; target=_blankhttp://docs.python.org/lib/ctypes-finding-shared-libraries.html/abr divdiv/divdiv class=Wj3C7cbr ___br Python tracker lt;a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]/agt;br lt;a href=http://bugs.python.org/issue2936; target=_blankhttp://bugs.python.org/issue2936/agt;br ___br /div/div/blockquote/divbr ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3019] Python3a5 compile failing due to high memory usage
New submission from Florian Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have tried building Python3a5 today using the tarball offered on your internet site. The process './python -E setup.py build' keeps on allocating my memory using more than 80% of my RAM, I am certain that it would have used more if I had not cancelled it. When I use ltrace to track the system calls and put it into the Makefile, the resource usage still raises but much slower, if I use ltrace and supply it a PID, the memory usage raises as fast as normal. I think this is due to something in ltrace, it's understandable because it produced a file of more than 600MB. I attached an excerpt of the output of ltrace, showing you how the system calls seem to repeat, and the output of './configure', 'make', 'uname -a', 'lspci' and 'lsmod' so you have some data about my system. I also got a screenshot showing the output of htop, make and strace together: http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/2275/screenshot1ab8.png. Maybe the output of two different programs(ltrace and strace) will help you too. I tried out building the current SVN py3k branch, resulting in a similar problem. PS: It would help if you allowed uploading of multiple files to bug reports -- components: Build files: output messages: 67585 nosy: segfaulthunter severity: normal status: open title: Python3a5 compile failing due to high memory usage type: compile error versions: Python 3.0 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10488/output ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3019 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2936] ctypes.util.find_library() doesn't consult LD_LIBRARY_PATH
Bill Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: OK, I went back and read the code. What I should be using is ctypes.cdll.LoadLibrary(libgoodstuff.1.dylib). Thanks -- I think you can close this issue. Bill On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Thomas Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thomas Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: The question is, which linker? I think it should be ld.so, which links on demand, and does pay attention to LD_LIBRARY_PATH. I'm not sure what the point of find_library() is, otherwise. The best explanation is in the python docs: http://docs.python.org/lib/ctypes-finding-shared-libraries.html ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2936 ___ Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10489/unnamed ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2936 ___OK, I went back and read the code.nbsp; What I should be using is quot;ctypes.cdll.LoadLibrary(quot;libgoodstuff.1.dylibquot;)quot;.nbsp; Thanks -- I think you can close this issue.brbrBillbrbrdiv class=gmail_quote On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Thomas Heller lt;a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]/agt; wrote:brblockquote class=gmail_quote style=border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex; div class=Ih2E3dbr Thomas Heller lt;a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]/agt; added the comment:br br /divdiv class=Ih2E3dgt; The question is, which linker? nbsp;I think it should be ld.so, which links quot;onbr gt; demandquot;, and does pay attention to LD_LIBRARY_PATH. nbsp;I#39;m not sure what thebr gt; point of find_library() is, otherwise.br br /divThe best explanation is in the python docs:br a href=http://docs.python.org/lib/ctypes-finding-shared-libraries.html; target=_blankhttp://docs.python.org/lib/ctypes-finding-shared-libraries.html/abr divdiv/divdiv class=Wj3C7cbr ___br Python tracker lt;a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]/agt;br lt;a href=http://bugs.python.org/issue2936; target=_blankhttp://bugs.python.org/issue2936/agt;br ___br /div/div/blockquote/divbr ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3019] Python3a5 compile failing due to high memory usage
Florian Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Added the output of GDB as the memory usage was nearing 70%. Hope it helps. Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10490/gdb_output ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3019 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2138] Add a factorial function
Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I've got in from here. -- assignee: marketdickinson - rhettinger ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2138 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3019] Python3a5 compile failing due to high memory usage
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Turns out this is due to GCC 4.3 being used. Dupe of #2626. -- nosy: +georg.brandl resolution: - duplicate status: open - closed ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3019 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2584] numeric overflow in IDLE
Changes by Kurt B. Kaiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- resolution: - wont fix status: open - closed ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2584 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
