New submission from Berthold Höllmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
For a Project of mine I have set latex_documents to something like
latex_documents = [
('index', 'doc.tex', 'Documentation', 'Berthold Höllmann', 'manual'),
]
With this processing fails with:
LANG=C make latex
mkdir -p build/latex
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I am working on Thomas' patch, plus tests.
--
assignee: - amaury.forgeotdarc
nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2542
New submission from Fredrik Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The docstring for random.Random mentions a method getrandombits().
Surely this should be getrandbits()?
This ghost method is also mentioned in the Library Reference page for
the random module.
--
assignee: georg.brandl
Richard Boulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I don't think it's reasonable not to support multiple interpreters in a
single process - they're quite widely used by mod_python and mod_wsgi,
and probably by others. I'm not sure whether that's a problem here or
not, though.
If we need to
Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Alexandre - can you take a look at the solution for issue3125 and tell me
if this satisfies your concerns? Note that the merge-forward is blocked in
py3k by issue3385 (which is assigned to you)
___
Python
Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Minor code cleanups, and fixes to special-value handling in r65299
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2819
___
Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
From Victor:
Ok, here is a patch for test_multiprocessing.py.
- TestClosedFile.test_open() verify that Connection() rejects closed file
descriptor
- TestClosedFile.test_operations() verify that Connection() raises IOError
for
operations on
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I'm quite sure that neither the patch nor the new test make sense on
Windows. A file handle is not a file descriptor!
--
nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Thanks! Fixed in r65307.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3470
Changes by Andrii V. Mishkovskyi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file10967/trunk.csv.py.diff
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3436
___
Changes by Andrii V. Mishkovskyi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file10965/py3k.csv.py.diff
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3436
___
Antoine Pitrou [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I think the proposal to deprecate os.fdopen should be brought on
python-3000.
--
nosy: +pitrou
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2491
Eric L. Frederich [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
If we put the following one liner right after sqlite_inc_paths is
defined it will add include directories based on the PATH environment
variable.
sqlite_inc_paths.extend([re.sub('/bin[/]?$', '/include', p) for p in
os.environ.get('PATH',
Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Renamed math.sum to math.fsum (as previously discussed) in r65308.
I think all that's left now is to add a note to the docs about the
problems on x86.
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
New submission from Armin Rigo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There is a bunch of obscure behavior caused by the use of
PyObject_GetAttr() to get special method from objects. This is wrong
because special methods should only be looked up in object types, not on
the objects themselves (i.e. with
Antoine Pitrou [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
The problem is that the fix for #3295 was committed in the py3k branch
(in r64751) rather thank on the trunk!
Once PyExc_BufferError is defined properly the crash disappears and
exceptions are printed instead.
Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I think this should be resolved in 2.6/3.0 if possible. Especially if
distributions like Ubuntu are self-patching the fix into place. For
reference, see: http://mg.pov.lt/blog/subprocess-in-2.4
--
nosy: +jnoller
Skip Montanaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Guido I know this has been closed, but perhaps the fieldnames attribute
Guido could be made into a property that reads the first line of the
Guido file if it hasn't been read yet?
It's a nice thought. I tried the straightforward
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Sorry, that was my oversight! I've backported the fix.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3139
___
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
... and backported to the trunk in r65310.
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3295
___
___
Changes by Kevin Watters [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
nosy: +kevinwatters
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3006
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
New submission from Jeff Rodman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Change current introduction in 1.1
WAS:
Mac OS X 10.4 comes with Python 2.3 pre-installed by Apple. However, you are
encouraged to install the most recent version of Python from the Python website
(http://www.python.org). A ``universal
Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Added documentation note about x86 problems in r65315.
Jean, Raymond: is it okay to close this issue now?
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2819
Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Here (fsum8.patch) is a clean version of the alternative fsum algorithm.
I'd like to push for using this in place of the existing algorithm.
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11008/fsum8.patch
___
Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Mark, I don't currently have a machine with SVN and a compiler
installed, so can't play with patches. I just want to note here that,
if you're concerned about speed, it would probably pay to eliminate all
library calls except one to frexp().
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Did you try using a Unicode string? IIRC the docs explicitly say that if
you include non-ASCII chars in the config you should use Unicode strings.
--
status: open - pending
___
Python tracker [EMAIL
Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Re-opened for consideration of GvR's suggestion.
--
resolution: wont fix -
status: closed - open
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3436
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
It's indeed better.
Now with when running my previous script I can see the exception ;-)
Exception in thread Thread-2:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File C:\dev\python\trunk1\lib\threading.py, line 523, in
__bootstrap_inner
Antoine Pitrou [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Le mercredi 30 juillet 2008 à 23:03 +, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc a
écrit :
Again, I think this is unfortunate for a simple script that prints from
several threads.
Yes, but it's an issue with the BufferedWriter implementation, since it
Antoine Pitrou [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
About r65312, BufferError inherits from StandardError, not directly from
Exception :)
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3295
___
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Antoine Pitrou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Antoine Pitrou [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
About r65312, BufferError inherits from StandardError, not directly from
Exception :)
[ Benjamin slaps his
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
If it was rewritten to use a fixed-size bytearray
does such an object exist today?
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3139
___
Antoine Pitrou [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Le jeudi 31 juillet 2008 à 00:00 +, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc a écrit :
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
If it was rewritten to use a fixed-size bytearray
does such an object exist today?
Manually, yes :)
Just
New submission from Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
functions with keyword-only arguments have this form:
def f(x, *args, y):
pass
parameters can appear after the *arg, they are required to be passed by
keyword.
It would be more consistent to allow this function call:
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Committed r65320 in trunk.
I'll close the issue after it is merged into py3k.
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - pending
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Should this apply to 2.6 as well? See r65321, I find the last line
easier to read when arguments are in this order.
def grouper(n, iterable, fillvalue=None):
args = [iter(iterable)] * n
return izip_longest(*args,
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I just merged it.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
status: pending - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2542
___
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
How is this coming? Can we apply this to 2.6?
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1692335
___
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Hmm. I suppose this is still an issue. Should it be a release blocker yet?
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2322
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I'm going to defer this to 2.7.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
versions: +Python 2.7 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2335
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
This has been done.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: - duplicate
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2336
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I'm deferring this to 2.7
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
versions: +Python 2.7 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2340
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Is this still an issue?
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2369
___
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
We have a fixer for this.
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2368
___
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Ping.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2226
___
___
Changes by Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2373
___
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
How is this coming?
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2367
___
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Ping
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2366
___
___
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I assume you wanted to close this too.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1581
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Is this still a problem?
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1616
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Collin, can you review the 2to3 patch?
--
assignee: - collinwinter
components: +2to3 (2.x to 3.0 conversion tool) -Interpreter Core
nosy: +benjamin.peterson, collinwinter
___
Python tracker
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
What's the status of this?
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2470
___
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Ping.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1518
___
___
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
What's the status of this?
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2443
___
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
What's the status of this?
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2375
___
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I guess this isn't going anywhere...
--
resolution: - rejected
status: open - closed
versions: +Python 2.7 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2458
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Any more information on this?
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1731717
___
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Ping
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1717
___
___
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Ping.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2389
___
___
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Any progress?
--
assignee: - josiahcarlson
nosy: +benjamin.peterson, josiahcarlson
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1563
___
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Collin, can you review?
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2370
___
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Does anybody still care about this for 2.6?
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1179
___
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
re now handles bytes, so what's next?
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1685
___
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
[ccing people who might now if this should still be an issue.]
--
nosy: +gpolo, loewis
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2902
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
On lack of response from the OP, I'm going to mark this closed.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: - works for me
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
What needs to happen here?
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2965
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
priority: critical - release blocker
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2384
___
___
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Alexandre, are you still computerless?
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2744
___
___
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Ping
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2548
___
___
Changes by Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
priority: critical - release blocker
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2919
___
___
Changes by Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
priority: critical - release blocker
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3132
___
___
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Ping
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
priority: critical - release blocker
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1878
___
New submission from Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It turns out that functools.reduce() is simply __builtins__.reduce().
That does not stop the DeprecationWarning from using reduce() from being
raised even though the message says to use functools.reduce()!
Easiest solution is to create a
73 matches
Mail list logo