geremy condra debat...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Antoine Pitrou rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Le samedi 19 juin 2010 à 00:55 +, geremy condra a écrit :
geremy condra debat...@gmail.com added the
New submission from Oren Held o...@held.org.il:
On unices, ismount checks whether the given path is a mount point.
On windows, it only checks whether it's a drive letter.
Long story short, Python simply returns False when doing ismount(rc:\mount1),
while c:\mount1 is a real mount point.
This
STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com added the comment:
About the patch:
- Why not reading itemsize from buffer.itemsize?
- A test would be nice in Lib/test/test_array.py (in test_tofromstring?).
Please add also a.extend(bytearray(b'xjxjx')) to the test suite.
I agree that it is a
STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com added the comment:
Shouldn’t “inside a :ctype:`Py_BEGIN_ALLOW_THREADS` block” rather use
“:cmacro:”?
Same remark on IRC: Taggnostr haypo, in r82084: Add :ctype: to
Py_BEGIN_ALLOW_THREADS and int, maybe :cfunc: (or :cmacro:)?
I don't know
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file14540/python-trunk-20090722-MINGW.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3871
___
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file15261/python-trunk-20091104-MINGW.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3871
___
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file15416/python-trunk-20091129-MINGW.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3871
___
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file15465/python-trunk-20091206-MINGW.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3871
___
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file15725/python-trunk-20100103-MINGW.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3871
___
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file16364/python-trunk-20100225-MINGW.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3871
___
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file16534/python-trunk-20100313-MINGW.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3871
___
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file16806/python-trunk-20100407-MINGW.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3871
___
STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com added the comment:
Maybe the solution is to use the win32 console API directly...
Yes, it is the best solution because it avoids the horrible mbcs encoding.
About cp65001: it is not *exactly* the same encoding than utf-8 and so it
cannot be used as
Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info added the comment:
Patches to this issue require first patch from issue 3754. The last patch here
now is from 2010-05-16. This patch cannot be applied to trunk as it will fail
after update for readline in setup.py. You could use trunk version before
Tim Golden m...@timgolden.me.uk added the comment:
Switching to Python 3.2 as this essentially constitutes a behaviour change and
2.6 is in bugfix mode and 2.7 is about to enter rc2. It would certainly be
possible to use one of the volume APIs under the covers. Would you be willing
to offer a
Tim Golden m...@timgolden.me.uk added the comment:
All we need to do is check the FILE_ATTRIBUTE_REPARSE_POINT
in the file attributes. Frustratingly, we grab file attributes
a dozen times in posixpath.c only to throw most of it away.
Is there a case for adding an attributes function to os.path
Tim Golden m...@timgolden.me.uk added the comment:
... of course you still need to get the reparse tag to determine whether this
is a mount point so the file attributes alone in this case are not enough.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Le dimanche 20 juin 2010 à 06:30 +, geremy condra a écrit :
crypto API
==
[...]
For presentation purposes, I would order layers by abstraction levem:
that is, layer 1 should be the lower-level layer and layer 2 the
upper-level.
I
New submission from Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org:
This feature request is extracted from issue 9020, where Py_CHARMASK(c)
was used on EOF, producing different results depending on whether
__CHAR_UNSIGNED__ is defined or not.
The preferred fix for issue 9020 is to check for EOF before
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Thus,
((unsigned char)((c) 0xff)) and ((unsigned char)(c)) should produce
the same results.
If it's the case, it's probably optimized away by the compiler anyway.
There is no reason not to do the cast when __CHAR_UNSIGNED__ is
defined (it
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org added the comment:
Is r80761 something that can be safely reverted?
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8959
___
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +giampaolo.rodola
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9035
___
___
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
Summary of brief discussion on #python-dev:
- This is a hacky patch; it would be better to rewrite that portion of ast.c in
a way that doesn't modify the original CST at all. With 2.7 so close, I daren't
try anything more invasive than this
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment:
`someref` would be more convenient than :func:`someref` but in case of
namespace conflict (for example, as a result of documentation merge it both
:func:`someref` and :class:`someref` can appear) - it would be necessary to go
through
New submission from Jonathan G. Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com:
In the documentation section on Extending Python with C or C++ there is an
Intermezzo on Errors and Exceptions which shows how to create a custom
exception in an extension module. I was just following these instructions
Frederic Torres fredericaltor...@gmail.com added the comment:
print repr(sys_version)
returns
'2.6.1 (IronPython 2.6.1 (2.6.10920.0) on .NET 2.0.50727.3603)'
The format of sys.version now start with a version number
2.6.1 (IronPythons 2.6.1 (2.6.10920.0) on .NET 4.0.30319.1)
My guess is that
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment:
RDM, running your way will execute test from standard library location of
installed Python.
python -m unittest test.test_httpservers.BaseHTTPServerTestCase.test_handler
But I want to execute test from my own patched copy of
Michael Foord mich...@voidspace.org.uk added the comment:
But I want to execute test from my own patched copy of test_httpservers.py
with whatever python I want. I.e.
C:\Python27\python.exe Z:\python-cgi-tests\test_httpservers.py ...
If you use Python 2.7 then the following at the end of
Thomas Heller thel...@ctypes.org added the comment:
Is r80761 something that can be safely reverted?
Yes, I think so.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8959
___
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment:
If you use Python 2.7 then the following at the end of the test module
enables the same command line features that David Murray pointed you to:
if __name__ == '__main__':
unittest.main()
Unfortunately, test_httpservers.py from
Michael Foord mich...@voidspace.org.uk added the comment:
Right. That code should change. My intention is to go through the whole of the
Python test suite and make them compatible with the new unittest features.
I also intend to add extensions to unittest to allow listing of collecting
tests
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org added the comment:
2010/6/20 Thomas Heller rep...@bugs.python.org:
Thomas Heller thel...@ctypes.org added the comment:
Is r80761 something that can be safely reverted?
Yes, I think so.
Can you do so? Thanks.
--
New submission from Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
test_distutils
test test_distutils failed -- Traceback (most recent call last):
File /home/antoine/py3k/ssl-8524/Lib/distutils/tests/support.py, line 16,
in _capture_warnings
return func(*args, **kw)
File
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
It might be nice to see the version that avoids the dup() and has the
duplicate code instead (interesting trade-off ;). Just for the sake of
comparison against the forget() proposal.
Here it is. There's probably a bit of polishing left to
Christian Hofstaedtler ch+pythonb...@zeha.at added the comment:
Will this be part of 3.2 and possibly 2.7?
Without these patches wide character input using curses is basically impossible
(on at least some platforms).
--
nosy: +zeha
___
Python
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file8933/unnamed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1589
___
___
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file8941/unnamed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1589
___
___
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file11463/unnamed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1589
___
Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com added the comment:
The patch looks good but I am not comfortable with this change until it's
tested under other windows/VC flavors.
I'll leave it up to Benjamin to decide whether it goes in rc2
--
___
Python
New submission from Yoda_Uchiha mmpyr...@gmail.com:
I recently installed python 3.1 on a Windows XP computer. I cannot open IDLE
nor module Docs. When I click on them, nothing happens. I am wondering if there
is anyway on opening either of those too files. I do know how to IDLE through
the
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment:
The same subject on python-dev raised last month received positive feedbacks:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-May/100197.html
--
nosy: +giampaolo.rodola
___
Python tracker
Changes by Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org:
--
priority: normal - release blocker
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8854
___
___
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
All that is needed now is a working patch... :)
--
nosy: +r.david.murray
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2516
___
Changes by Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org:
--
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2516
___
___
44 matches
Mail list logo
