Ross Lagerwall rosslagerw...@gmail.com added the comment:
Attached is a patch which fixes the issue.
Instead of allowing the readline method to lose data, it adds a check to
SocketIO.readinto() to ensure that the socket does not have a timeout and
throws an IOError if it does. Also does the
Changes by Ross Lagerwall rosslagerw...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +loewis, pitrou
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7322
___
___
Ross Lagerwall rosslagerw...@gmail.com added the comment:
issue1515839 seems to be a duplicate of this one.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7995
___
Jacques Grove aquara...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks for putting up the hg repo, makes it much easier to follow.
Getting back to the performance regression I reported in msg124904:
I've verified that if I take the hg commit 7abd9f9bb1 , and I back out the
guards changes manually, while
Ned Deily n...@acm.org added the comment:
The problem you have reported here was later independently reported in
Issue7995 where a possible fix has been proposed. Suggest adding yourself to
the nosy list of that issue to monitor current status.
--
nosy: +ned.deily
resolution: -
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Le vendredi 31 décembre 2010 à 00:07 +, Patrick W. a écrit :
Patrick W. p...@borntolaugh.de added the comment:
Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) at 2010-12-30 18:32 (UTC)
We are talking about context, not cause.
Yes, but - as said before -
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
While this patch looks conformant to the documentation, it is very likely to
break code in the wild. Even in the stdlib, there are uses of makefile() +
socket timeouts (e.g. in http.client and urllib). It would be better to find a
way to make
Konstantin Osipov kostja.osi...@gmail.com added the comment:
I was able to observe the same issue:
I'm using Python 2.6.5 on Ubuntu 10.0.4 LTS. My system is 64 bit Intel Core I7,
Quad core, Linux kernel 2.6.32-generic x86_64, Ubuntu EGLIBC 2.11.1-0ubuntu7.5.
A simple client TCP socket, which
New submission from M. Z. mzdkm...@gmail.com:
Trying to unpack a ZIP file where some packet files contain danish letters
results in:
zipfile.BadZipFile: File name in directory 'filename_with_æoå.txt'
and header b'filename_with_\x91o\x86.txt' differ.
Using Py 3.2b2 on Win7.
Unpack the
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc, haypo, loewis
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10801
___
___
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Thanks for the patch. Comments/questions:
- please don't use C++-style comments (//) in C code; some compilers can
choke on them
- should the code path be also enabled for netbsd? (or other variants?)
- why does the test silence socket.error on
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
The attached patch fixes it for me. No time to write tests right now.
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20205/zipfile.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Ross Lagerwall rosslagerw...@gmail.com added the comment:
From what I coud see, the same applied to NetBSD so I enabled it for NetBSD as
well - if there are any other OSes that need it enabled, they can be added.
The updated patch checks for fcntl() failing and simply leaves the socket as is
Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us added the comment:
raise AttributeError from None
makes sense to me, and in a nice, short example like that I prefer it.
In real code, however, I think
raise AttributeError.no_context(Field %s is not in table % attr)
is going to be easier for the human to
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
I just tried John's patch, and:
- it still applies without problem (except for a bit of offset)
- I can confirm that it actually adds test coverage for leapdays() function
(bringing calendar coverage from 71% to 72%).
I think it would be
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Hi Nick,
the See also section already points to unittest module; are you asking to
extend its description to mention that's the tool people should use for their
unittest suites?
Cheers,
Sandro
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
Why not? :-)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2636
___
___
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
Here is a proof of concept patch if anyone wants to play with it.Note that
a higher value could be used for the j option; multiple threads help even on
uniprocessor systems since a bunch of the tests spend time waiting around.
The
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Hello,
I tried on a freshly build 2.7, and I can't replicate the reported error. Could
it be it has been fixed by r78136?
Sridhar, are you still seeing this error?
Cheers,
Sandro
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
Applied in r87590. I threw in an extra test for a multi-leapyear-range. Since
there was no reason not to, I backported it to 3.1 in r87591 and 2.7 in r87592.
In the latter two commits I also backported the issue 9342 patch.
Thanks
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
Backported it to 3.1 in r87591 and 2.7 in r87592 along with the patch for issue
9361.
--
nosy: +r.david.murray
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9342
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Already fixed in r86107
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
resolution: - fixed
stage: commit review - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
I finally got around to researching this issue in the tracker.
Issue 10298 is a close relative to this issue. The fix from that issue make
the test that Xuanji added here pass. That issue contains no testsit would
be ideal to have
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
FWIW, having just looked at related code in zipfile recently, this patch looks
correct to me.
--
nosy: +r.david.murray
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
For future reference, the 'trunk' branch was frozen with the release of 2.7 in
June 2010. However, this particular text is unchanged since in 2.7.1 and still
in 3.2b2 (except for removal of 'new style'.)
--
nosy: +terry.reedy
Changes by Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu:
--
nosy: +bethard
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10772
___
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
Requests for information should go to python-list or other support forums. That
said, does the response settle this issue, so that it can be closed, or is
there still a claim that something should be changed in the Python repository?
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
Since the current behavior matches the current doc,
class unittest.TextTestRunner(stream=sys.stderr, descriptions=True,
verbosity=1, runnerclass=None, warnings=None)
A basic test runner implementation which prints results on standard error.
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
From reading the Wikipedia article, I might conclude that beta = 1/theta, but
from reading random.py, beta=theta. I think this much should be clarified, but
without giving the formula in a hard to read text form. Perhaps the random doc
should
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
Since threading is written in Python, one might expect Lock to be written in
Python and its methods to accept keywords. However, threading.py (3.2) has
_acquire_lock = _thread.acquire_lock
Lock = _aquire_lock
so threading.Lock objects are
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
2.6 is finished except for possible security patches.
This should be verified in a current release, preferably 3.2
--
nosy: +terry.reedy
stage: - needs patch
versions: +Python 2.7 -Python 2.6
___
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com added the comment:
Yeah, I think I wrote this issue based on the diff that added the new note at
the top, rather than looking at the existing intro text that already references
unittest and doctest.
No need to change anything after all.
--
resolution:
Gregory P. Smith g...@krypto.org added the comment:
it happens on 3.2 (py3k head).
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20208/unnamed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10794
Changes by Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file20199/z6285.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6285
___
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
I verified the bug by creating a copy of idlelib/help.txt, making the new help
entry, testing it, deleting the copy, and retesting -- IDLE silently
disappears. (A copy is necessary because IDLE checks that the file exists and
gives a similar
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
Just to check, does this still work with your changes of msg124959?
regex.search(r'\d{4}(\s*\w)?\W*((?!\d)\w){2}', XX)
For me it fails to match!
--
___
Python tracker
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
Bug and fix also apply to missing Idlelib/help.txt.
r87601 News entry for 3.2. Thanks Scott.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6285
Jacques Grove aquara...@gmail.com added the comment:
You're correct, after the change:
regex.search(r'\d{4}(\s*\w)?\W*((?!\d)\w){2}', XX)
doesn't match (i.e. as before commit 7abd9f9bb1).
I was, however, just trying to narrow down which part of the code change killed
the performance on
Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com added the comment:
I'll try to produce a test in the next hour or two
--
nosy: +eli.bendersky
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10801
___
Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com added the comment:
I'm attaching a patch with a test for Martin's fix. I had trouble
programmatically generating a bad zip for this bug, since it has different
encodings for the header and filename (probably created by WinZip?). So I
created a directory in test/
Changes by Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file20210/issue10801_test.1.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10801
___
Changes by Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20211/issue10801_test.1.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10801
___
42 matches
Mail list logo
