[issue16997] subtests
holger krekel added the comment: On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Antoine Pitrou rep...@bugs.python.orgwrote: Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Please don't commit I think we still need a discussion as to whether subtests or paramaterized tests are a better approach. I certainly don't think we need both and there are a lot of people asking for parameterized tests. I think they don't cater to the same crowd. I see parameterized tests as primarily used by people who like adding formal complexity to their tests in the name of architectural elegance (decorators, non-intuitive constructs and other additional boilerplate). Subtests are meant to not get in the way. IMHO, this makes them more suitable for stdlib inclusion, while the testing-in-python people can still rely on their additional frameworks. Parametrized testing wasn't introduced because I or others like formal complexity. I invented the yield syntax that both pytest and nose still support and it was enhanced for several years until it was deemed not fit for a general purpose testing approach. More specifically, if you have functional parametrized tests, they each run relatively slow. People often want to re-run a single failing test or otherwise select tests which use a certain fixture, or send tests to different CPUs to speed up execution. That's all not possible with subtests or am i missing something? That being said, I have plans to support some form of subtests for pytest as well, as there are indeed cases where a more lightweight approach fits well, especially for unit- or integration tests where one doesn't care if a group of tests need to be re-run when working on fixing a failure to a single subtest. And where it's usually more about reporting, getting nice debuggable output on failures. I suspect the cases which Antoine refers satisfy this pattern. best, holger -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16997 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16997] subtests
holger krekel added the comment: On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Nick Coghlan rep...@bugs.python.orgwrote: Nick Coghlan added the comment: You can use subtests to build parameterized tests, you can't use parameterized tests to build subtests. I doubt you can implement parametrized tests via subtests especially for functional testing and its fixture needs. The standard library can also be converted to using subtests *far* more readily than it could be converted to parameterized tests. I can see that and for this reason and the stdlib's use cases it might make sense to support it. The unittest module is also used in many other contexts so it shouldn't be the only verification criterium. best, holger -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16997 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4591] 32-bits unsigned user/group identifier
Mark Dickinson added the comment: Hmm; good point. Well, +1 to the functionality, anyway; I'll leave the discussion about the name. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue4591 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17179] TypeError: type() takes 1 or 3 arguments
New submission from Chris Withers:
from types import new_class
from datetime import datetime
new_class('tdatetime', (datetime, ), kwds={'foo':'bar'})
Traceback (most recent call last):
File console, line 1, in module
File /src/Python-3.3.0/Lib/types.py, line 52, in new_class
return meta(name, bases, ns, **kwds)
TypeError: type() takes 1 or 3 arguments
I'm guessing ns and kwds should be combined before being passed through to
meta? (meta is 'type' in this case)
--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 181884
nosy: cjw296
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: TypeError: type() takes 1 or 3 arguments
versions: Python 3.3
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17179
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17180] shutil copy* unsafe on POSIX - they preserve setuid/setgit bits
New submission from Milko Krachounov: When copying the mode of a file with copy, copy2, copymode, copystat or copytree, all permission bits are copied (including setuid and setgit), but the owner of the file is not. This can be used for privilege escalation. An example: -rwSr--r-- 1 milko milko0 фев 11 10:53 test1 shutil.copy(test1, test2) -rwSr--r-- 1 root root 0 фев 11 10:53 test2 If test1 contained anything malicious, now the user milko can execute his malicious payload as root. Potential fixes: - Strip setuid/setgid bits. - Copy the owner on POSIX. - Perform a safety check on the owner. - Document the security risk. The behaviour of copymode/copystat in this case is the same as `chmod --reference', and there can be some expectation of unsafety, but copy/copy2/copytree's behaviour differs from that of `cp -p', and this is a non-obvious difference. -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 181885 nosy: milko.krachounov priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: shutil copy* unsafe on POSIX - they preserve setuid/setgit bits versions: Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17180 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4591] 32-bits unsigned user/group identifier
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: There is a problem with test_pwd on 64-bit platform. It expects KeyError on pwd.getpwuid(sys.maxsize). Actually the test is not looks robust. On 32-bit platform sys.maxsize = 2**31-1 2**32 and this value only by chance was not in the user database. On 64-bit platform sys.maxsize 2**32 and in old code it was wrapped to 2**31-1 C unsigned int value and this value only by chance was not in the user database. New code doesn't wrap the value to C unsigned int and raises an overflow exception. What should I change, a test or a raised exception? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue4591 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17159] Remove explicit type check from inspect.Signature.from_function()
Nick Coghlan added the comment:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Terry J. Reedy rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
I am also puzzled by the 'from None' part in
+ raise TypeError('{!r}' is not a Python function.format(func)) from None
While I remember that being in the pydev discussion and while raise XyzError
from None executes, it does not seems to be documented for 3.3 in 7.8. The
raise statement. (Should this be another issue?) In fact, that section says
if given, the second expression must be another exception class or instance,
which excludes None.
That's a separate docs bug - it seems we missed the necessary language
reference updates when implementing PEP 309. The relevant docs are
here: http://docs.python.org/3/library/exceptions.html#built-in-exceptions
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17159
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16997] subtests
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: what if there are 500 subtests in a loop and you don't want 500 failures to be registered for that test case? Parametered tests have the same issue. In this case you simply don't use subtests or test cases. On the other hand, the issue doesn't exist in most cases where you iterate over three or four different cases. addMessage was just one suggestion. It is quite orthogonal, actually, and could be added independently. Also, it is not clear how you would limit the addMessage to a subtest, rather than the whole test case. We could re-use testtools' addDetail idea, although their content-type thing is a bit heavyweight: I'd rather duck-type the API. http://testtools.readthedocs.org/en/latest/for-test-authors.html#details -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16997 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17181] SSLContext.set_servername_callback should be able to set argument
New submission from Daniel Black: I think my original implementation of the SNI callback to see a original sslcontext was wrong. It would be much more useful for the SSLContext.set_servername_callback to take a callable and an object as an argument. This would allow constructs like the following where self can be used within the callback. Example: def cb_sni(ssl_sock, server_name, self): self.sniname = server_name self.context.set_servername_callback(cb_sni, self) The original functionality can still occur with: self.context.set_servername_callback(cb_sni, self.context) Agree? -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 181889 nosy: grooverdan, pitrou priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: SSLContext.set_servername_callback should be able to set argument type: enhancement versions: Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17181 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10852] SSL/TLS sni use in smtp, pop, imap, nntp, ftp client libs by default
Daniel Black added the comment: Ack. Have fix. Simple if self.certfile or self.keyfile: test added before load_cert_chain. part way through developing test. Thinking #17181 would help. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10852 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17052] unittest discovery should use self.testLoader
Michael Foord added the comment: I think you're right! Thanks. -- assignee: - michael.foord resolution: fixed - status: closed - open ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17052 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17152] Array module should support boolean natively
Jesús Cea Avión added the comment: we have a -1, so I close this as rejected. I still think it is a valuable idea to pursuit. -- resolution: - rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17152 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17152] Array module should support boolean natively
Changes by Jesús Cea Avión j...@jcea.es: -- stage: - committed/rejected ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17152 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17044] Implement PEP 422: Simple class initialisation hook
Changes by Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +flox ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17044 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17052] unittest discovery should use self.testLoader
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset ece0a2e6b08e by Michael Foord in branch '2.7': Correction to issue 17052 fix http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/ece0a2e6b08e New changeset 867763eb6985 by Michael Foord in branch '3.2': Correction to issue 17052 fix http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/867763eb6985 New changeset a79650aacb43 by Michael Foord in branch 'default': Merge. Closes issue 17052. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a79650aacb43 -- resolution: - fixed stage: commit review - committed/rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17052 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17182] signal.default_int_handler should set signal number on the raised exception
New submission from Antoine Pitrou: Having a dedicated optional attribute on KeyboardInterrupt receiving the signal number would be useful in certain circumstances, for example if you want to propagate the signal to a child process. -- components: Extension Modules messages: 181894 nosy: pitrou priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: signal.default_int_handler should set signal number on the raised exception type: enhancement versions: Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17182 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17063] assert_called_with could be more powerful if it allowed placeholders
Michael Foord added the comment: I still don't particularly like the idea of the assert_* methods returning something. If the call args tuples had args and kwargs attributes, for which there are outstanding feature requests, then you could simply do: my_mock(1, someobj(), bar=someotherobj()) foo = my_mock.call_args.args[1] bar = my_mock.call_args.kwargs['bar'] By avoiding the extra step of tuple unpacking this is still nice and readable (IMO). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17063 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17064] Fix sporadic buildbot failures for test_mailbox
R. David Murray added the comment: Thanks, Jeremy. -- resolution: - fixed stage: - committed/rejected status: open - closed type: - behavior versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.2 -Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17064 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17181] SSLContext.set_servername_callback should be able to set argument
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: This would allow constructs like the following where self can be used within the callback. Example: def cb_sni(ssl_sock, server_name, self): self.sniname = server_name self.context.set_servername_callback(cb_sni, self) The original functionality can still occur with: self.context.set_servername_callback(cb_sni, self.context) But you could simply use a closure: def cb_sni(ssl_sock, server_name): self.sniname = server_name self.context.set_servername_callback(cb_sni) -- title: SSLContext.set_servername_callback should be able to set argument - SSLContext.set_servername_callback should be able to setargument ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17181 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4591] 32-bits unsigned user/group identifier
Eric V. Smith added the comment: +1 for PyIndex_AsLong() -- nosy: +eric.smith ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue4591 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17064] Fix sporadic buildbot failures for test_mailbox
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset bbeff2958cc5 by R David Murray in branch '3.2': #17064: fix sporadic permission errors in test_mailbox on windows. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/bbeff2958cc5 New changeset 3e3915cbfde3 by R David Murray in branch '3.3': Merge: #17064: fix sporadic permission errors in test_mailbox on windows. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/3e3915cbfde3 New changeset aa15df77e58f by R David Murray in branch 'default': Merge: #17064: fix sporadic permission errors in test_mailbox on windows. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/aa15df77e58f New changeset 1c2dbed859ca by R David Murray in branch '2.7': #17064: fix sporadic permission errors in test_mailbox on windows. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/1c2dbed859ca -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17064 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9874] Message.attach() loses empty attachments
R. David Murray added the comment: Lacking a reproducer, there's not much we can do here, so closing. -- resolution: - works for me stage: test needed - committed/rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9874 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17171] email.encoders.encode7or8bit does not work with binary data
Changes by R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com: -- type: - behavior ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17171 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15767] add ModuleNotFoundError
Changes by Barry A. Warsaw ba...@python.org: -- nosy: +barry ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15767 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15767] add ModuleNotFoundError
Barry A. Warsaw added the comment: For me, it mostly comes down to whether end-users are expected to see such errors generally or not. We see ImportErrors all the time, and they are clearly errors. If we're expected to see and deal with MNF, and if in such cases it's generally considered an error, then MNFError is better. If it's mostly an internal/hidden thing, then MNF doesn't bother me. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15767 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16935] unittest should understand SkipTest at import time during test discovery
Zachary Ware added the comment: Sure can. With a little luck, I'll have the patch ready later today; with less luck it'll be sometime later this week. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16935 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17183] Small enhancements to Lib/_markupbase.py
New submission from Guido Reina: In the file: Lib/_markupbase.py, function: _parse_doctype_element there is: if '' in rawdata[j:]: return rawdata.find(, j) + 1 rawdata[j:] is being scanned twice. It would be better to do: pos = rawdata.find(, j) if pos != -1: return pos + 1 Same thing in the function: _parse_doctype_attlist: if ) in rawdata[j:]: j = rawdata.find(), j) + 1 else: return -1 It would be better to do: pos = rawdata.find(), j) if pos != -1: j = pos + 1 else: return -1 -- messages: 181903 nosy: guido priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Small enhancements to Lib/_markupbase.py type: enhancement versions: Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17183 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17183] Small enhancements to Lib/_markupbase.py
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com: -- assignee: - ezio.melotti components: +Library (Lib) nosy: +ezio.melotti stage: - needs patch versions: -Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17183 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17183] Small enhancements to Lib/_markupbase.py
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: if '' in rawdata[j:]: return rawdata.find(, j) + 1 See issue17170 for this idiom. -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17183 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17171] email.encoders.encode7or8bit does not work with binary data
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset f83581135ec4 by R David Murray in branch '3.2': #17171: fix email.encoders.encode_7or8bit when applied to binary data. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/f83581135ec4 New changeset cabcddbed377 by R David Murray in branch '3.3': Merge: #17171: fix email.encoders.encode_7or8bit when applied to binary data. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/cabcddbed377 New changeset a80b67611c6d by R David Murray in branch 'default': Merge: #17171: fix email.encoders.encode_7or8bit when applied to binary data. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a80b67611c6d New changeset e44fa71d76fe by R David Murray in branch '2.7': #17171: backport behavior-confirming test from python3. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/e44fa71d76fe -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17171 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17171] email.encoders.encode7or8bit does not work with binary data
R. David Murray added the comment: Since this was straightforwardly similar to the issue 16564 fix I didn't bother with a review. The 2.7 commit is backporting the behavior-confirming test, just for thoroughness. -- resolution: - fixed stage: needs patch - committed/rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17171 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4591] 32-bits unsigned user/group identifier
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: (perhaps we need as PyNumber_AsLongIndex() to do the direct conversion to a C long, it would make things easier in many cases) In this case we need PyNumber_AsLongAndOverflowIndex() and PyNumber_AsUnsignedLongIndex(). And a lot of other parallel functions for other cases. This can exponentially increase a number of functions. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue4591 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4591] 32-bits unsigned user/group identifier
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Not technically the topic of this issue, but should we just lock
down _Py_Uid_Converter() to ints?
I just copied this code from PyArg_ParseTuple*() for 'l' format.
This is still accepted:
os.setuid(Decimal(1000.2))
Any C implemented function which parses an integer argument with
PyArg_ParseTuple*() accepts decimals.
chr(65.2)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
TypeError: integer argument expected, got float
chr(Decimal('65.2'))
'A'
I think this is an offtopic for this issue.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4591
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16935] unittest should understand SkipTest at import time during test discovery
Zachary Ware added the comment: I think this patch should cover the test and Doc changes necessary. Of course, let me know if it doesn't :) -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29039/issue16935.v2.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16935 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4591] 32-bits unsigned user/group identifier
Stefan Krah added the comment:
Serhiy Storchaka rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Not technically the topic of this issue, but should we just lock
down _Py_Uid_Converter() to ints?
I just copied this code from PyArg_ParseTuple*() for 'l' format.
os.setuid(Decimal(1000.2))
I know that this behavior wasn't introduced by you. It's perfectly fine
to use PyArg_ParseTuple() for guidance or to try to preserve the existing
behavior.
chr(Decimal('65.2'))
'A'
I just happen to think that PyArg_ParseTuple() is wrong here and we shouldn't
enable this feature in new code. Fixing these issues one by one is probably
the best way forward.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4591
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17130] Add runcall() function to profile.py and cProfile.py
Guido van Rossum added the comment: Antoine, what about the decorator? I've come across a few use cases. --Guido van Rossum (sent from Android phone) On Feb 10, 2013 10:14 AM, Antoine Pitrou rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: Antoine Pitrou added the comment: +1 for runcall() and the context manager. -- nosy: +pitrou ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17130 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17130 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17052] unittest discovery should use self.testLoader
Chris Jerdonek added the comment: Thanks a lot for taking care of this issue, Michael. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17052 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17130] Add runcall() function to profile.py and cProfile.py
Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment: See issue 9285 in which I wrote a decorator for profile/cProfile. That can be modified to work both as a decorator or a context manager by using contextlib.contextmanager. Shall I continue in issue 9285 and rewrite that patch? -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17130 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15767] add ModuleNotFoundError
Brett Cannon added the comment: Right, so what's typical? =) I mean do most people see ImportError for optional modules (e.g. not on support platforms), or do most people see ImportError because they messed up and tried to import something that they expected but actually isn't there for some reason. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15767 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12077] Harmonizing descriptor protocol documentation
Franck Michea added the comment: Here is at least a correction of Descriptors' HowTo. There are two versions since some stuff differs (object inheritance, ...). Here are some of my interrogations though: - RevealAccess is not using instance parameter, so value is shared. Is this intended? - Don't really know what to do with Function and Methods part. First I don't really understand the relevance of this in a descriptor how-to. Also it is know outdated in python3 version (unbound thing, ...), so what do? - In __getattribute__ function, I don't really understand the paramters given to __get__, why None and the instance? But this is probably my fault. This also doesn't answer the question about the real source that should be kept. What to do? I also need a proof-read, since english is not my first language... Anyway it's clearly not enough to be published like that Have a nice day! -- keywords: +patch nosy: +kushou versions: +Python 3.5 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29040/12077_descriptor_howto_python3.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12077 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12077] Harmonizing descriptor protocol documentation
Changes by Franck Michea franck.mic...@gmail.com: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29041/12077_descriptor_howto_python2.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12077 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17130] Add runcall() function to profile.py and cProfile.py
Guido van Rossum added the comment: Sure, I will comment on that issue. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17130 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9285] Add a profile decorator to profile and cProfile
Guido van Rossum added the comment: Brief comments: - Please don't call it profile -- we already have a module by that name. - Please make it so that both the decorator and context manager can specify a file where to dump the raw data -- basically it needs to have the same functionality as the functions run()/runctx()/runcall() (the latter TBD, see issue 17130). - Please also make Profile object itself the context manager -- all you have to do is add __enter__() and __exit__() that call enable() and disable(). (But this doesn't completely replace the global function, which has more functionality -- it prints the profile or dumps the data). -- nosy: +gvanrossum ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9285 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9285] Add a profile decorator to profile and cProfile
Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment: Ok, will look into this soon. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9285 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15767] add ModuleNotFoundError
Barry A. Warsaw added the comment: On Feb 11, 2013, at 05:31 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: Right, so what's typical? =) I mean do most people see ImportError for optional modules (e.g. not on support platforms), or do most people see ImportError because they messed up and tried to import something that they expected but actually isn't there for some reason. There are a few common use cases (or perhaps anti-use cases) where you see ImportErrors. I might be missing some, but I'd put these in roughly descending order of commonness. * Trying alternative imports for compatibility reasons. You always expect ImportErrors in these cases, and you'll always catch them in try/excepts. * Missing modules, submodules, or attributes in from-imports. These can be unexpected if you think you've got the right version of a package, or expected for compatibility reasons. * Trying to conditionally import optional modules. Again, expected, and they'll be wrapped in try/except. I guess the case you're trying to differentiate with MNF is, the from-import case, i.e. did the error occur because the module was missing or because the attribute was missing? It's hard to say which is more likely, which I guess is why you're having a hard time deciding. :) If I had to vote, I'd go with MNFError 1) because it's a subclass of ImportError; 2) it'll be more informative in the case where it really *is* an error; 3) isn't that big of a deal in cases where it's expected; 4) we're used to seeing ImportError anyway, and probably most code won't care and will just use ImportError. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15767 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4591] 32-bits unsigned user/group identifier
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: There is a problem with test_pwd on 64-bit platform. Fixed in changesets a0983e46feb1 and 1e9fa629756c: Raise KeyError instead of OverflowError when getpwuid's argument is out of uid_t range. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue4591 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17130] Add runcall() function to profile.py and cProfile.py
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Antoine, what about the decorator? I've come across a few use cases. I don't know, I'm thinking that there should be one obvious way to do it :-) By that I mean that the context manager is more generic than the decorator. Or do you want to decorate functions from an external library? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17130 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4591] 32-bits unsigned user/group identifier
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: In this case we need PyNumber_AsLongAndOverflowIndex() and PyNumber_AsUnsignedLongIndex(). And a lot of other parallel functions for other cases. This can exponentially increase a number of functions. I don't think it will be exponential :-) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue4591 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17181] SSLContext.set_servername_callback should be able to set argument
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: (functools.partial is another solution to the problem) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17181 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17130] Add runcall() function to profile.py and cProfile.py
Guido van Rossum added the comment: If I quickly want to profile one function, with the decorator I have to insert a with-statement in its body and mess with the indentation of the entire body. With a decorator it's just a one-line insertion. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17130 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17130] Add runcall() function to profile.py and cProfile.py
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Ah, fair enough. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17130 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15767] add ModuleNotFoundError
Brett Cannon added the comment: Screw it, I'll go with ModuleNotFoundError since it is a subclass of ImportError and so it might come off as weird as saying the superclass is an Error but the subclass is not. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15767 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17184] re.VERBOSE doesn't respect whitespace in '( ?Pfoo...)'
New submission from Roy Smith: # Python 2.7.3 # Ubuntu 12.04 import re pattern = r( ?Pphrase.*) regex = re.compile(pattern, re.VERBOSE) The above raises an exception in re.compile(): Traceback (most recent call last): File ./try.py, line 6, in module regex = re.compile(pattern, re.VERBOSE) File /home/roy/env/python/lib/python2.7/re.py, line 190, in compile return _compile(pattern, flags) File /home/roy/env/python/lib/python2.7/re.py, line 242, in _compile raise error, v # invalid expression sre_constants.error: nothing to repeat The problem appears to be that re.VERBOSE isn't ignoring the space after the (. Maybe this is a duplicate of issue15606 ? -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 181927 nosy: roysmith priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: re.VERBOSE doesn't respect whitespace in '( ?Pfoo...)' type: behavior versions: Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17184 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15606] re.VERBOSE whitespace behavior not completely documented
Changes by Roy Smith r...@panix.com: -- nosy: +roysmith ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15606 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17170] string method lookup is too slow
Changes by Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +flox, haypo ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17170 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17184] re.VERBOSE doesn't respect whitespace in '( ?Pfoo...)'
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com: -- components: +Regular Expressions nosy: +ezio.melotti, mrabarnett ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17184 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15606] re.VERBOSE whitespace behavior not completely documented
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: See also related issue11204. -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15606 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17130] Add runcall() function to profile.py and cProfile.py
Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment: As for runcall() we haven't the ability to freely support kwargs *and* filename. I see two possibilities. Kill kwargs, as such: +def runcall(func, *args, filename=None, sort=-1): +Run func(*args) under profiler, optionally saving results in +filename. + ...or make 'filename_' and 'sort_' two special name kwargs to be used as in: runcall(fun, foo=1, bar=2, filename_='...') Also, there might be some value in adding 'strip_dirs' argument to those functions (run/runctx/runcall). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17130 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11204] re module: strange behaviour of space inside {m, n}
Changes by Roy Smith r...@panix.com: -- nosy: +roysmith ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11204 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16997] subtests
Chris Jerdonek added the comment: what if there are 500 subtests in a loop and you don't want 500 failures to be registered for that test case? Parametered tests have the same issue. In this case you simply don't use subtests or test cases. Right, but then you lose out on both of the benefits documented for subtests: +Without using a subtest, execution would stop after the first failure, +and the error would be less easy to diagnose because the value of ``i`` +wouldn't be displayed:: Why tie these together? I'm suggesting that we expose a way to benefit from the easy to diagnose portion without the suspend stoppage portion. (The way we do this doesn't have to be one of the ways I'm suggesting, though I've suggested a few.) addMessage was just one suggestion. It is quite orthogonal, actually, and could be added independently. Also, it is not clear how you would limit the addMessage to a subtest, rather than the whole test case. It's not orthogonal because the way I suggested it, subTest() would be the composition of addMessage() and continueTest() context managers. (addMessage limits itself by being a context manager just like subTest.) So if we added addMessage() later, we would want to refactor subTest() to be using it. The equivalence would be something like the following: with self.subTest(msg=msg, i=i): self.assertEqual(i % 2, 0) with self.continueTest(): with self.addMessage(msg, i=i): self.assertEqual(i % 2, 0) However, since it looks like we're going with changing the test case ID instead of putting the extra data only in the exception message (TestCase.longMessage) like I was suggesting before, I think adding a failFast=True or maxFailures=n parameter to subTest() has higher importance, e.g. with self.subTest(msg=msg, maxFailures=1, i=i): self.assertEqual(i % 2, 0) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16997 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17184] re.VERBOSE doesn't respect whitespace in '( ?Pfoo...)'
Matthew Barnett added the comment: It does look like a duplicate to me. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17184 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16997] subtests
Changes by Brett Cannon br...@python.org: -- nosy: -brett.cannon ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16997 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16997] subtests
Changes by Yaroslav Halchenko yarikop...@gmail.com: -- nosy: -Yaroslav.Halchenko ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16997 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15351] Add to unittest.TestCase support for using context managers
Changes by Michael Foord mich...@voidspace.org.uk: -- assignee: - michael.foord ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15351 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13555] cPickle MemoryError when loading large file (while pickle works)
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file29020/pickle_overflow-3.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13555 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13555] cPickle MemoryError when loading large file (while pickle works)
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Test updated too. Now it doesn't try to write a string larger than 2 GiB (it's impossible), instead writes a lot of shorter strings with total size larger than 2 GiB. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29042/pickle_overflow-4.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13555 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17170] string method lookup is too slow
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: A related issue: the speed of finding and hence replacing chars in strings is known to have regressed in 3.3 relative to 3.2, especially on Windows. For long strings, that will negate in 3.3 the speedup for the initial method call. See #16061, with patches. The holdup seems to be deciding which of two good patches to apply. -- nosy: +terry.reedy ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17170 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17185] create_autospec
New submission from Chris Withers: Sticking an issue in at Michael's request... Older versions of mock had a helper called mocksignature. In newer versions, create_autospec replaces this, but doesn't get it right sometimes: from inspect import getargspec from mock import create_autospec def myfunc(x, y): pass ... getargspec(myfunc) ArgSpec(args=['x', 'y'], varargs=None, keywords=None, defaults=None) getargspec(create_autospec(myfunc)) ArgSpec(args=[], varargs='args', keywords='kwargs', defaults=None) mocksignature gets it right: from mock import mocksignature getargspec(mocksignature(myfunc)) ArgSpec(args=['x', 'y'], varargs=None, keywords=None, defaults=None) -- assignee: michael.foord messages: 181934 nosy: cjw296, michael.foord priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: create_autospec ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17185 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17186] no way to introspect registered atexit handlers
New submission from Chris Withers: Python 2 had a private but usable way of introspecting and manipulating registered atexit handlers by way of the atexit._exithandlers. In Python 3, registering and unregistering are handled, but there is no longer a way to see what atexit handlers are registered. Barry suggested filing a bug to have this added as a new feature for Python 3.4. Some kind of read-only sequence would be fine, if the original list can no longer be exposed. -- messages: 181935 nosy: cjw296 priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: no way to introspect registered atexit handlers versions: Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17186 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17187] Python segfaults from improperly formed and called function
New submission from Larry Hastings: Python 3.3 added a nice new feature: if you don't supply enough positional parameters to a function, it tells you the names of the positional parameters you omitted. Unfortunately, the code that prints this error message assumes that the function is well-formed. If I manually create a function using types.CodeType and types.FunctionType, and I don't provide enough entries in the types.CodeType varnames parameter to satisfy all the positional parameters, and I call the resulting function with insufficient parameters, Python crashes. I've attached a sample script that demonstrates this crash. I can reproduce it with both 3.3.0 and a recent trunk. Since this feature wasn't in 3.2 or before, the bug doesn't seem to exist in those versions; I couldn't reproduce with 3.2 or 2.7. The crash occurs in missing_arguments() in Python/ceval.c, line 3256 in trunk. The function calls PyTuple_GET_ITEM on the co_varnames tuple without checking that it has sufficient entries. It gets a crazytown pointer, calls PyObject_Repr on it, and boom. I've attached a band-aid patch which prevents the crash, but this is almost certainly not the fix we want. Perhaps types.CodeType should refuse to generate the malformed code object in the first place? -- components: Interpreter Core files: crashy.py keywords: 3.3regression messages: 181936 nosy: larry priority: normal severity: normal stage: needs patch status: open title: Python segfaults from improperly formed and called function type: crash versions: Python 3.3, Python 3.4 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29043/crashy.py ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17187 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17187] Python segfaults from improperly formed and called function
Changes by Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org: -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29044/lch.bandaid.for.malformed.fn.crash.1.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17187 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16851] Hint about correct ismethod and isfunction usage
Greg Couch added the comment: In my opinion, the Python 2.7 results are wrong. In Python 2.7, inspect.ismethod returns True for both bound and unbound methods -- ie., is broken according to the documentation. As a workaround, I'm using: def is_bound_method(obj): return hasattr(obj, '__self__') and obj.__self__ is not None is_bound_method also works for methods of classes implemented in C, e.g., int: a = 1 is_bound_method(a.__add__) True is_bound_method(int.__add__) False But is not very useful in that case because inspect.getargspec does not work for functions implemented in C. is_bound_method works unchanged in Python 3, but as noted above, in Python 3, inspect.ismethod properly distinguishes between bound and unbound methods, so it is not necessary. -- nosy: +gregcouch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16851 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16997] subtests
Andrew Bennetts added the comment: googletest (an xUnit style C++ test framework) has an interesting feature: in addition to assertions like ASSERT_EQ(x, y) that stop the test, it has EXPECT_EQ(x, y) etc that will cause the test to fail without causing it to stop. I think this decoupling of “test failed” and “test execution stopped” is very useful. (Note this also implies a single test can have multiple failures, or if you prefer that a single test can have multiple messages attached to explain why its state is 'FAILED'.) I wouldn't like to see a duplication of all assert* methods as expect* methods, but there are alternatives. A single self.expectThat method that takes a value and a matcher, for instance. Or you could have a context manager: with self.continueOnFailure(): self.assertEqual(x, y) In fact, I suppose that's more-or-less what the subtests patch offers? Except the subtests feature seems to want to get involved in knowing about parameters and the like too, which feels weird to me. Basically, I really don't like the “subtests” name, but if instead it's named something that directly says its only effect is that failures don't abort the test, then I'd be happy. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16997 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17188] Document 'from None' in raise statement doc.
New submission from Terry J. Reedy: Language manual, section 7.8. The raise statement has no mention of the 'from None' option. Indeed it says if given, the second expression must be another exception class or instance, which would exclude None. Library manual, Ch 5. Built-in Exceptions, says ''' When raising a new exception (rather than using a bare raise to re-raise the exception currently being handled), the implicit exception context can be supplemented with an explicit cause by using from with raise: raise new_exc from original_exc The expression following from must be an exception or None. It will be set as __cause__ on the raised exception. Setting __cause__ also implicitly sets the __suppress_context__ attribute to True, so that using raise new_exc from None effectively replaces the old exception with the new one for display purposes (e.g. converting KeyError to AttributeError, while leaving the old exception available in __context__ for introspection when debugging. ''' I am not sure how much should be copied over, but None should be at least mentioned and perhaps there should be a cross-reference. I am also not sure how much applies to 3.2, but there is no version-added or -changed note with the above. -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 181939 nosy: docs@python, ncoghlan, terry.reedy priority: normal severity: normal stage: needs patch status: open title: Document 'from None' in raise statement doc. versions: Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17188 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17159] Remove explicit type check from inspect.Signature.from_function()
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: I opened separate issue #17188: Document 'from None' in raise statement doc. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17159 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17189] Add zip64 support to shutil
New submission from William Mallard: This patch enables creation of 64-bit zip files via make_archive(). make_archive uses ZipFile to create zip files. ZipFile already supports creation of 64-bit archives via a kwarg, but make_archive hard-codes it to 32-bit. This patch exposes the option in a backwards compatible way. -- components: Library (Lib) files: shutil_zip64.patch keywords: patch messages: 181941 nosy: william.mallard priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Add zip64 support to shutil type: enhancement versions: Python 3.3 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29045/shutil_zip64.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17189 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1518] Fast globals/builtins access (patch)
Larry Hastings added the comment: It sort of looks like this was closed because we assumed we were moving to Unladen Swallow. We're not. Should this be reopened? -- nosy: +larry ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1518 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17111] test_surrogates of test_fileio fails sometimes on OS X 10.4
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 9497adb7355f by Ned Deily in branch '2.7': Issue #17111: Prevent test_surrogates (test_fileio) failure on OS X 10.4. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/9497adb7355f -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17111 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17111] test_surrogates of test_fileio fails sometimes on OS X 10.4
Changes by Ned Deily n...@acm.org: -- resolution: - fixed stage: commit review - committed/rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17111 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17190] _FAST opcodes do no range checking
New submission from Larry Hastings: The implementations for LOAD_FAST, STORE_FAST, and DELETE_FAST don't check that the index is = the size of fastlocals. So it's a snap to crash the interpreter with hand-written bytecode, by going past the end of the fastlocals array. Kaboom! Attached is a program that demonstrates a crash with each of LOAD_FAST, STORE_FAST, and DELETE_FAST. These all crashed 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, and a recent trunk. (Well, two exceptions: LOAD_FAST and DELETE_FAST didn't crash 3.2. Given the behavior, my suspicion is not that 3.2 is hardened, just that there's something dopey with my thrown-together test.) It could be that this is not an interesting bug, that policy suggests that anyone who can write their own bytecode is a Consenting Adult. You tell me. -- components: Interpreter Core files: crashy2.py messages: 181944 nosy: larry priority: normal severity: normal stage: needs patch status: open title: _FAST opcodes do no range checking type: crash versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29046/crashy2.py ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17190 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17190] _FAST opcodes do no range checking
Raymond Hettinger added the comment: It could be that this is not an interesting bug, that policy suggests that anyone who can write their own bytecode is a Consenting Adult. Yes, that is correct on all counts. Sorry, this is an *ancient* discussion, long ago put to bed. Besides, did you really want to kill the performance of our fastest opcodes in everyone's code just to save a bytecode hacker from shooting him/herself in the foot? -- nosy: +rhettinger resolution: - invalid status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17190 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1518] Fast globals/builtins access (patch)
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: See issue 10401. Quoting myself: “Here is the Nth patch for a globals/builtins cache. As other caches at the same kind, it shows very small to no gain on non-micro benchmarks, showing that contrary to popular belief, globals/builtins lookup are not a major roadblock in today's Python performance.” -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1518 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4591] 32-bits unsigned user/group identifier
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 3893ab574c55 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '3.2': Issue #4591: Uid and gid values larger than 2**31 are supported now. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/3893ab574c55 New changeset 035cbc654889 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '2.7': Issue #4591: Uid and gid values larger than 2**31 are supported now. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/035cbc654889 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue4591 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
