[issue18320] idle, pydoc search python on wrong path at make altinstall with different exec- and prefix e.g. $HOME
New submission from cosmicduck:
Using Solaris 10 x86
Compiling actual 3.3.2 or 2.7.5 looks like work.
Installing as non-root with
make altinstall prefix='${HOME}/scripts/tools/python/python-3.3.2'
exec-prefix='${HOME}/scripts/tools/python/python-3.3.2' installs looks like
correctly to the target.
Extends LD_LIBRARYPATH and PATH to
${HOME}/scripts/tools/python/python-3.3.2/lib and
${HOME}/scripts/tools/python/python-3.3.2/bin has been done.
Python is started correctly with python3.3.
If I start idle3.3 or pydoc3.3 I get error:
/usr/local/bin/python3.3: bad interpreter: No such file or directory.
So it looks like the she-bang is not correctly set for shell scripts to the
path prefix and exec-prefix path.
Correcting that by manually setup to
${HOME}/scripts/tools/python/python-3.3.2/bin fix that problem. But I guess
it's better to modify the installation process by make to have not future
problems.
--
components: IDLE
messages: 191977
nosy: cosmicduck
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: idle, pydoc search python on wrong path at make altinstall with
different exec- and prefix e.g. $HOME
versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18320
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9938] Documentation for argparse interactive use
Ethan Furman added the comment: It doesn't look like xuanji has signed a CLA. Should we create a new issue, and have someone else create a new patch, and let this issue just be about the docs? -- nosy: +ethan.furman ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9938 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18321] Multivolume support in tarfile module
New submission from Eduardo Robles Elvira: The patch attached provides implementation for multivolume support for tarfile module. It contains both the changes in the module and a battery of unit tests. It contains support for multivolume for both GNU and PAX formats. The main idea behind this proposal is that for dealing with new volumes, the user will provide a callback function. In this callback function the user typically calls to TarFile.open_volume(filename) with the appropiate filename. This is quite flexible in the sense that the callback function could even ask the user for the filename of the next volume (as tar command does), or do anything they need before returning or before calling to open_volume. Please feel free to comment on how to improve the implementation or the API. Documentation for the new feature will be provided at a later stage of the review process if the patch gets a good review. -- components: Library (Lib) files: cpython-tarfile-multivolume.patch keywords: patch messages: 191979 nosy: edulix priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Multivolume support in tarfile module versions: Python 3.4 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30720/cpython-tarfile-multivolume.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18321 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18317] gettext: DoS via crafted Plural-Forms
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: I would rather ask: why do we eval() MO files? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18317 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18317] gettext: DoS via crafted Plural-Forms
Christian Heimes added the comment: We don't eval() the whole MO file. It's just the pluralization formula, http://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/manual/gettext.html#index-nplurals_0040r_007b_002c-in-a-PO-file-header_007d-1093 The patch uses ast.NodeVisitor to look for dangerous code. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30721/18317_gettext.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18317 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18042] Provide enum.unique class decorator
Ethan Furman added the comment: unique() added to enum.py; tests added; docs updated. If no complaints within a few days I'll push them through. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30722/unique.stoneleaf.01.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18042 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18042] Provide enum.unique class decorator
Changes by Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us: -- stage: - patch review ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18042 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18321] Multivolume support in tarfile module
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +lars.gustaebel stage: - patch review type: - enhancement ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18321 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18317] gettext: DoS via crafted Plural-Forms
Jakub Wilk added the comment: Making token filtering more thorough may be simpler that going through AST. I think Python should accept all the operators that GNU gettext accepts: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gettext.git/tree/gettext-runtime/intl/plural.y?id=v0.18.2.1#n132 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18317 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18308] checkRecvmsgAddress wrong in test_socket.py (AIX failures)
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr: -- nosy: +neologix ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18308 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16251] pickle special methods are looked up on the instance rather than the type
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: At the very least the pickle docs deserve some mention of the behavior. That way people won't need to spend as much time trying to figure out why things aren't working the way they expect. I think you are overreacting. The rule you are talking about (special methods are only looked up on the class) is really known by experts, not so much by common Python programmers. I'd argue that pickle doesn't break normal users' expectations here. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16251 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18322] test_stat nits
New submission from Antoine Pitrou: Patch with small fixes and improvements to test_stat. -- assignee: christian.heimes components: Tests files: test_stat.patch keywords: patch messages: 191985 nosy: christian.heimes, pitrou priority: normal severity: normal stage: patch review status: open title: test_stat nits type: behavior versions: Python 3.4 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30723/test_stat.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18322 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18287] PyType_Ready() should sanity-check the tp_name field
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr: -- nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson stage: - patch review versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.3, Python 3.4 -Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18287 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18287] PyType_Ready() should sanity-check the tp_name field
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc added the comment: The patch is not complete: PyType_Ready() returns -1 but no no exception is set. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18287 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18224] pyvenv pydoc.py script causing AttributeErrors on Windows
Vinay Sajip added the comment: On further reflection: the pydoc script adds no value over and above python -m pydoc args, so I think I will remove it. -- assignee: - vinay.sajip versions: +Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18224 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14455] plistlib unable to read json and binary plist files
Ronald Oussoren added the comment: I intend to commit my latest version of the patch during the europython sprints, with a minor change: don't include dump(s) and load(s), that change (and the other items on open issues in my last post) can be addressed later. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14455 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18323] 'GzipFile' object has no attribute 'extrastart'
New submission from Laurent Gautier: When creating a `gzip.GzipFile` using the named parameter `fileobj` rather than filename, iterating over it is broken: ``` AttributeError: 'GzipFile' object has no attribute 'extrastart' ``` The short example below is demonstrating the problem: ## --- import gzip, tempfile _data = (b'@WXOVW:25:85', b'ATACGCGGCT'+b'GATCGTAGCG', b'+', b'@@))BB'+b'???ECCEECC') data = gzip.zlib.compress(b'\n'.join(_data)) foo = tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile() foo.write(data) foo.flush() foo.seek(0) gzf = gzip.GzipFile(fileobj=foo) # this will trigger the AttributeError for x in gzf: print(x) -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 191989 nosy: Laurent.Gautier priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: 'GzipFile' object has no attribute 'extrastart' type: crash versions: Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18323 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18287] PyType_Ready() should sanity-check the tp_name field
Niklas Koep added the comment: Oh, you're right, of course. I completely forgot that any other case which jumps to the error label assumes an appropriate exception has already been set. I attached a new patch which raises a TypeError. Is there a better way to identify the type which is affected by this exception? Since we're complaining about the missing tp_name field we obviously can't supply the name in the exception. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30724/patch.default ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18287 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18287] PyType_Ready() should sanity-check the tp_name field
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc added the comment: Since this error can occur only during the development of a C extension, I would not worry too much. The traceback will already indicate the imported module, this is much better than a segfault later in pydoc. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18287 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18042] Provide enum.unique class decorator
Eli Bendersky added the comment: Sent some review comments. I'll be on a short vacation this weekend, so please wait at least until next week so I can review the changes. Also, Nick should definitely review this too :) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18042 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18323] 'GzipFile' object has no attribute 'extrastart'
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr: -- nosy: +nadeem.vawda ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18323 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18321] Multivolume support in tarfile module
Martin v. Löwis added the comment: Eduardo, can you please fill out the contributor form? -- nosy: +loewis ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18321 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18309] Make python slightly more relocatable
Ronald Oussoren added the comment: Note that the OSX port already does this for framework builds. I don't know why we don't use the same code for shared library builds. Issue #15498 contains a patch that switches this code from a deprecated nextstep-era API to dladdr. Two comments on the patch attached to this issue: 1) The name _PyImport_GetModulePath is confusing, I'd use _PyImport_GetSharedLibPath to make clear that this is locating the shared library. 2) The code calls dladdr on a static variable that's introduced just for that, it is also possible to call dladdr on an already existing symbol (for example the address of a function in the public API). -- nosy: +ronaldoussoren ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18309 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18317] gettext: DoS via crafted Plural-Forms
Christian Heimes added the comment: Thanks for the link plural.y! I was looking for a C file, not a YACC file. The AST approach has advantages over tokenizing. The tokenizer returns just symbols but the AST has also context information. It makes it much easier to distinguish between unary - and binary -. Gettext supports substraction but doesn't allow negative numbers. Python's gettext is not as strict as GNU gettext. For 3.4 I like to forbid oct and hex numbers, too. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30725/18317_gettext2.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18317 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18322] test_stat nits
Christian Heimes added the comment: I wish the loader would ignore all test classes with a leading underscore or would gain another way to mark a test class as abstract. The mixin approach looks ugly and prohibits tab completion in my IDE. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18322 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9938] Documentation for argparse interactive use
R. David Murray added the comment: Yes, I think opening a new issue at this point might be a good idea. The reason is that there are a changes either in place or pending in other issues that involve the parse_know_args code, so a new patch is probably required regardless. I wish I had time to review and commit all the argparse patches, but so far I haven't gotten to them. They are on my todo list somewhere, though :) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9938 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18323] 'GzipFile' object has no attribute 'extrastart'
R. David Murray added the comment: Based on a quick glance at the code, the problem isn't that you are passing fileobj, it is that fileobj has been opened for writing, not reading, and you are attempting to read from it. extrastart (and other attibutes) are only set if mode starts with 'r'. There is certainly a bug here, but it might just be that a clearer error should be generated if you try to read a fileobj open for writing. -- nosy: +r.david.murray ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18323 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18321] Multivolume support in tarfile module
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18321 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18323] 'GzipFile' object has no attribute 'extrastart'
R. David Murray added the comment: On the other hand, it seems reasonable to be able to read if you've done a seek(0), so a more complicated fix may also be appropriate. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18323 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14455] plistlib unable to read json and binary plist files
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Let me review your patch. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14455 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18322] test_stat nits
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: I wish the loader would ignore all test classes with a leading underscore or would gain another way to mark a test class as abstract. The mixin approach looks ugly and prohibits tab completion in my IDE. I don't really understand what makes mixins ugly. I'm sorry about your IDE :-) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18322 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10786] unittest.TextTextRunner does not respect redirected stderr
Sylvain Corlay added the comment: Hello, It would be great if this modification was also done for Python 2.7. A reason is that IPython redirects stderr. When running unit tests in the IPython console without specifying the stream argument, the errors are printed in the shell. See http://python.6.x6.nabble.com/How-to-print-stderr-in-qtconsole-td5021001.html -- nosy: +sylvain.corlay versions: +Python 2.7 -Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10786 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18111] Add a default argument to min max
R. David Murray added the comment: Julian, could you please submit a contributor agreement? (http://www.python.org/psf/contrib) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18111 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18322] test_stat nits
Christian Heimes added the comment: Ask your Java buddies about mixins. :) Go ahead and submit the patch. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18322 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17914] add os.cpu_count()
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 6a0437adafbd by Charles-François Natali in branch 'default': Issue #17914: Use os.cpu_count() instead of multiprocessing.cpu_count() where http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/6a0437adafbd -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17914 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18111] Add a default argument to min max
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 34ff27b431d0 by R David Murray in branch 'default': #18111: Add What's New entry for max/min default. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/34ff27b431d0 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18111 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18135] _ssl module: possible integer overflow for very long strings (+2^31 bytes)
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: Re-close? -- nosy: +terry.reedy ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18135 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18280] Documentation is too personalized
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: I find some anonymous I references (Guido? 20 years ago?) off-putting when reading the doc as formal reference. -- nosy: +terry.reedy ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18280 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18292] IDLE Improvements: Unit test for AutoExpand.py
Changes by Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu: -- nosy: +terry.reedy ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18292 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17914] add os.cpu_count()
Changes by Charles-François Natali cf.nat...@gmail.com: -- resolution: - fixed stage: patch review - committed/rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17914 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18135] _ssl module: possible integer overflow for very long strings (+2^31 bytes)
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@gmail.com: -- status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18135 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18301] In itertools.chain.from_iterable() there is no cls argument
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: The 2.7 doc says 'Roughly equivalent to' rather than 'Equivalent to'. The undecorated Python version of from_iterable actually works as an attribute of the Python version of chain: chain.from_iterable = from_iterable. I would just remove the decorator. The entire itertools doc exploits that fact that generator functions are analogous to classes, but it does not work to mix the two in the way that the 3.x chain entry does. -- nosy: +terry.reedy ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18301 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4768] email.generator.Generator object bytes/str crash - b64encode() bug?
R. David Murray added the comment: For the record, encode_quopri was fixed in #14360. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue4768 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14360] email.encoders.encode_quopri doesn't work with python 3.2
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 7c807bc15fa8 by R David Murray in branch '3.3': #14360: Add news item. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/7c807bc15fa8 New changeset 36cc8b0446b3 by R David Murray in branch 'default': Merge #14360: Add news item. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/36cc8b0446b3 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14360 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18324] set_payload does not handle binary payloads correctly
New submission from R. David Murray: In order to maintain model consistency without exposing the need for 'surrogateescape' to library users, it should be possible to pass binary data to set_payload and have it do the correct conversion to the expected storage format for the model. Currently, this does not work. The attached patch provides one example test out of a class of tests that should be written and made to pass. -- components: email files: set_qp_payload_test.patch keywords: easy, patch messages: 192012 nosy: barry, r.david.murray priority: normal severity: normal stage: test needed status: open title: set_payload does not handle binary payloads correctly type: behavior versions: Python 3.3, Python 3.4 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30726/set_qp_payload_test.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18324 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18322] test_stat nits
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18322 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18322] test_stat nits
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +zach.ware ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18322 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18305] [patch] Fast sum() for non-numbers
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: Performance enhancements do not normally go in bugfix releases. The issue of quadratic performance of sum(sequences, null_seq) is known, which is why the doc says that sum() is for numbers and recommends .join for strings and itertools.chain for other sequences. sum([[1,2,3]]*n, []) == [1,2,3]*n == list(chain.from_iterable([[1,2,3]]*n)) For n = 100, the second takes a blink of an eye and the third under a second. So there is no issue for properly written code. More generally, sum(listlist, []) == list(chain.from_iterable(listlist)) The latter should be comparable in speed to your patch and has the advantage of not turning the iterator into a concrete list unless and until one actually needs a concrete list. There are two disadvantages to doing the equivalent within sum: 1. People *will* move code that depends on the internal optimization to pythons that do not have it. And they *will* complain about their program 'freezing'. This already happened when the equivalent of str.join was built into sum. It is better to use 'proper' code that will work well enough on all CPython versions and other implementations. 2. It discourages people from carefully thinking about whether they actually need a concrete list or merely the iterator for a virtual list. The latter work for sequences that are too long to fit in memory. So my inclination is to reject the change. -- nosy: +terry.reedy versions: +Python 3.4 -Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18305 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18305] [patch] Fast sum() for non-numbers
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: I agree with Terry. CPython deliberately disallow use sum() with lists of strings. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18305 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18301] In itertools.chain.from_iterable() there is no cls argument
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Perhaps it should be staticmethod, not classmethod. -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18301 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17767] Fix test discovery for test_locale.py
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17767 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18266] Fix test discovery for test_largefile.py
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18266 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18322] test_stat nits
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: While you are at it, should you just replace test_main with unittest.main? -- nosy: +terry.reedy ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18322 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18322] test_stat nits
STINNER Victor added the comment: The mixin approach looks ugly and prohibits tab completion in my IDE. It is a common practice in Python, especially in tests. -- nosy: +haypo ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18322 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18325] test_kqueue fails in OpenBSD
New submission from Federico Schwindt: test_kqueue fails in OpenBSD/amd64 -current: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/obj/pobj/Python-3.3.2/Python-3.3.2/Lib/test/test_kqueue.py, line 79, in test_create_event ev = select.kevent(bignum, 1, 2, 3, sys.maxsize, bignum) OverflowError: signed integer is greater than maximum In OpenBSD, ident is an unsigned integer data is a signed integer. See http://bugs.python.org/issue12181 for details. -- components: Tests messages: 192018 nosy: Federico.Schwindt, neologix priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: test_kqueue fails in OpenBSD versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18325 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18325] test_kqueue fails in OpenBSD
Changes by Federico Schwindt federico.schwi...@gmail.com: -- type: - behavior ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18325 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18315] bufsize parameter not documented in 2.7.5
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: If you think you will ever contribute another patch (and we hope you do), and you have not yet submitted a contributor agreement, please do. http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/ http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/ Once processed, a * will appear after your name. In the meanwhile, I will fix this. (2.6 is security patches only.) Your patch missed the doc, as opposed to the docstrings, but your report with tracker research was unusually complete. Thanks. -- assignee: docs@python - terry.reedy nosy: +terry.reedy ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18315 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18315] bufsize parameter not documented in 2.7.5
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: David, with the addition, this line class FileInput([files[, inplace[, backup[, bufsize[, mode[, openhook]]) ends at position 83 instead of 80. It should stay on one line. I could reduce that by removing blanks after ,s. Is it better to be a bit too long or a bit too compressed? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18315 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18315] bufsize parameter not documented in 2.7.5
R. David Murray added the comment: At 83 it is a judgement call whether to leave it long or wrap it. I wouldn't compress it. (Wrapping is done by putting a '\' at the end of the line you want to wrap, if you don't already know that). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18315 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18315] bufsize parameter not documented in 2.7.5
Changes by Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30727/18315-fileinput-27.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18315 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18315] Fix fileinput doc and docstrings (add 'buffer' in 2.7)
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: I just remembered: the first list of a .py file docstring should be a one line summary of what the callable does. It should not give the signature because (unlike C function currently) help does that for us from the callable itself (using the inspect module). Putting it in the docstring just repeats it. On 3.3.2: help(fileinput.input) Help on function input in module fileinput: input(files=None, inplace=False, backup='', bufsize=0, mode='r', openhook=None) input(files=None, inplace=False, backup=, bufsize=0, mode=r, openhook=None) ... So the 3.x files need correcting also. For .doc, the signature does need to be present and correct. -- title: bufsize parameter not documented in 2.7.5 - Fix fileinput doc and docstrings (add 'buffer' in 2.7) versions: +Python 3.3, Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18315 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18315] Fix fileinput doc and docstrings (add 'buffer' in 2.7)
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 80b1c5b25ff0 by Terry Jan Reedy in branch '2.7': Issue #18315: Improve fileinput docs by adding 'bufsize' where missing and http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/80b1c5b25ff0 New changeset 0760b58526ba by Terry Jan Reedy in branch '3.3': Issue #18315: Improve fileinput docs by adding 'bufsize' where missing and http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/0760b58526ba -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18315 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18315] Fix fileinput doc and docstrings (add 'buffer' in 2.7)
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: There was one missing 'bufsize' in 3.x also. -- resolution: - fixed stage: - committed/rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18315 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18305] [patch] Fast sum() for non-numbers
Sergey added the comment: The issue of quadratic performance of sum(sequences, null_seq) is known I hope it's never too late to fix some bugs... :) sum([[1,2,3]]*n, []) == [1,2,3]*n == list(chain.from_iterable([[1,2,3]]*n)) But if you already have a list of lists, and you need to join the lists together you have only two of those: 1. sum(list_of_lists, []) 2. list(chain.from_iterable(list_of_lists)) And using sum is much more obvious than using itertools, that most people may not (and don't have to) even know about. When someone, not a python-guru, just thinks about that, she would think so, I'll just add lists together, let's write a for-loop... Oh, wait, that's what sum() does, it adds things, and python is dynamic-type, sum() should work for everything. That's how I was thinking, that's how most people would think, I guess... I was very surprised to find out about that bug. 1. People *will* move code that depends on the internal optimization to pythons that do not have it. Looks like this bug is CPython-specific, others (Jython, IronPython...) don't have it, so people will move code that depends on the internal optimization to other pythons that DO have it. :) 2. It discourages people from carefully thinking about whether they actually need a concrete list or merely the iterator for a virtual list. Hm... Currently people can also use iterator for sum() or list for itertools. Nothing changed... I agree with Terry. CPython deliberately disallow use sum() with lists of strings. Isn't it exactly because of this bug? I mean, if this bug gets fixed, sum would be as fast as join, or maybe even faster, right? So the string restriction can be dropped later. But that would be a separate bugreport. Anyway, the bug is there not just for strings, it also happens for lists, or for any other non-numeric objects that can be added. PS: I was ready that my patch may not get accepted, and I'm actually thinking on another way of doing that (just don't know how to get a copy of arbitrary PyObject in C yet). But I thought that the idea itself is great: finally making sum() fast without any trade-offs, what could be better? Patch works at least for 2.7, 3.3, hg-tip and can be easily ported to any other version. I have not expected to get such a cold shoulder. :( -- versions: +Python 2.7 -Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18305 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17940] extra code in argparse.py
Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com: -- stage: needs patch - patch review versions: +Python 3.4 -Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17940 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18081] test_logging failure in WarningsTest on buildbots
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 2176c1867b34 by Terry Jan Reedy in branch 'default': Issue #18081: Back out temporary changeset, 2a9e1eb3719c, to merge new patch. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/2176c1867b34 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18081 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18242] IDLE should not be replacing warnings.formatwarning
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset c15d0baac3d6 by Terry Jan Reedy in branch '3.3': Issue *18081, #18242: Change Idle warnings capture in PyShell and run to stop http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/c15d0baac3d6 New changeset 89e0d33cb978 by Terry Jan Reedy in branch '2.7': Issue *18081, #18242: Change Idle warnings capture in PyShell and run to stop http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/89e0d33cb978 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18242 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18242] IDLE should not be replacing warnings.formatwarning
Changes by Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu: -- resolution: - fixed stage: needs patch - committed/rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18242 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18081] test_logging failure in WarningsTest on buildbots
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: This was sent to #18242 but not here. I expected here also. New changeset c15d0baac3d6 by Terry Jan Reedy in branch '3.3': Issue *18081, #18242: Change Idle warnings capture in PyShell and run http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/c15d0baac3d6 New changeset 89e0d33cb978 by Terry Jan Reedy in branch '2.7': Issue *18081, #18242: Change Idle warnings capture in PyShell and run http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/89e0d33cb978 Brett's test case works on my machine, all 3 versions. python_d -m test[.regrtest] test_idle test_logging -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18081 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16000] test_curses should use unittest
Zachary Ware added the comment:
I had a chance to look at this today and took a stab at writing a patch
(attached). Since moving all of the test functions into a TestCase subclass
necessarily means indenting everything another level, the patch is a huge ugly
mix of - and + lines that don't really have any relation to each other. As
such, I'll also be attaching another patch which is for review purposes only:
it differs from the real patch by only indenting the def statements by 2 spaces
instead of the usual 4, allowing the bodies of the methods to not be indented,
which makes the changes MUCH easier to keep track of.
As Chris mentioned previously, running the test in verbose mode (under
regrtest) causes rendering problems. I worked around this by adding a
print('') to the setUp method; it doesn't make things perfect, but it makes
it a bit easier to read. I'm not terribly attached to this hack, though, so
I'd be fine with removing it if anyone has a preference.
Also as Chris mentioned, there is an open question of how to do setup, whether
to do things in TestCase.setUp, TestCase,setUpClass, or setUpModule. This
patch does initial curses.setupterm() in setUpModule, then initscr and savetty
in setUp (with resetty and endwin in tearDown). However, this is not how the
module has been testing; it has been doing initscr/savetty and resetty/endwin
only once throughout execution. I've considered creating a subclass of the
TestCurses test class which would do initscr/savetty in setUpClass, to do all
the tests again on the same screen (as has been up to now), but I'd like
others' opinions on that before I write it.
Also, this patch is against default; I'll make sure it works for 3.3 after a
round or two of review.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30728/issue16000.v1.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16000
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18316] Idle 2.7: update to simplify cross-version patches
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset aa1350c7d196 by Terry Jan Reedy in branch '2.7': Issue #18316: Update idlelib 2.7 except clauses to ease backports. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/aa1350c7d196 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18316 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16000] test_curses should use unittest
Changes by Zachary Ware zachary.w...@gmail.com: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30729/issue16000.v1-cmp.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16000 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
