[issue24399] Backports Arch Linux support for platform.linux_distribution()
New submission from Nathan Ringo:
On Arch Linux, running `python2 -c import platform; print
platform.linux_distribution()'
Before patch: ('', '', '')
After patch: ('arch', 'Arch', 'Linux')
This matches the Python 3 behavior:
`python3 -c import platform; print(platform.linux_distribution())'
('arch', 'Arch', 'Linux')
--
files: support_dist_arch.patch
keywords: patch
messages: 244925
nosy: Nathan Ringo
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Backports Arch Linux support for platform.linux_distribution()
versions: Python 2.7
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39644/support_dist_arch.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24399
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24399] Backports Arch Linux support for platform.linux_distribution()
Berker Peksag added the comment: Thanks for the report. This is a duplicate of issue 20454. -- nosy: +berker.peksag resolution: - duplicate stage: - resolved status: open - closed superseder: - platform.linux_distribution() returns empty value on Archlinux and python 2.7 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24399 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20454] platform.linux_distribution() returns empty value on Archlinux and python 2.7
Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +Nathan Ringo ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20454 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20454] platform.linux_distribution() returns empty value on Archlinux and python 2.7
Nathan Ringo added the comment: The problem is, existing software (Ansible) relies on linux_distribution() -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20454 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14373] C implementation of functools.lru_cache
Tim Graham added the comment: This changed caused a problem in Django's test suite (bisected to 0d0989359bbb0). File /home/tim/code/django/django/db/models/options.py, line 709, in _populate_directed_relation_graph all_models = self.apps.get_models(include_auto_created=True) TypeError: get_models() missing 1 required positional argument: 'self' The get_models() method is decorated with @lru_cache.lru_cache(maxsize=None) https://github.com/django/django/blob/c2b4967e76fd671e6199e4dd54d2a2c1f096b8eb/django/apps/registry.py#L157-L179 -- nosy: +Tim.Graham ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14373 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24390] Python 3.4.3 64 bits is not high dpi aware
New submission from Ivan Bykov: Python 3.4.3 (v3.4.3:9b73f1c3e601, Feb 24 2015, 22:44:40) [MSC v.1600 64 bit (AMD64)] on win32 Type copyright, credits or license() for more information. SM_CYSCREEN = 1 from ctypes import windll GetSystemMetrics = windll.user32.GetSystemMetrics GetSystemMetrics(SM_CYSCREEN) 1067 'really this value is 1600' 'executable must be labeled as high dpi aware' -- components: Windows messages: 244894 nosy: ivb, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Python 3.4.3 64 bits is not high dpi aware type: behavior versions: Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24390 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24391] Better repr for threading objects
Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com: -- stage: patch review - commit review ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24391 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24120] pathlib.(r)glob stops on PermissionDenied exception
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
The glob module is not affected because it ignores all OSErrors (including
Permission denied and Too many levels of symbolic links).
import glob
glob.glob('**/*', recursive=True)
['dir2/file1', 'dir2/file2', 'dir2/dir3', 'dir1/file1', 'dir1/file2']
There is no special test for PermissionError.
--
nosy: +serhiy.storchaka
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24120
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18003] lzma module very slow with line-oriented reading.
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr: -- priority: normal - release blocker ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18003 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24391] Better repr for threading objects
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com: -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39637/threading_objects_reprs.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24391 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24391] Better repr for threading objects
New submission from Serhiy Storchaka: Proposed patch adds makes reprs of threading objects Semaphore, BoundedSemaphore, Event, and Barrier expose their public states. This will help for debugging. Examples: Semaphore: 10 at 0xb710ec8c BoundedSemaphore: 7/10 at 0xb6ff1d6c unset Event at 0xb710ec8c set Event at 0xb710ec8c Barrier: 0/10 at 0xb6ff1d6c Barrier: 3/10 at 0xb6ff1d6c broken Barrier: 3/10 at 0xb6ff1d6c -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 244896 nosy: berker.peksag, brett.cannon, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka priority: normal severity: normal stage: patch review status: open title: Better repr for threading objects type: enhancement versions: Python 3.6 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24391 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24392] pop functioning
New submission from Padmanabhan Tr: I have attached the python sequence my comments. I use Python version 3.4.2 I guess a bug need be corrected -- components: Regular Expressions files: bug_a messages: 244897 nosy: Padmanabhan.Tr, ezio.melotti, mrabarnett priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: pop functioning type: behavior versions: Python 3.4 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39638/bug_a ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24392 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24391] Better repr for threading objects
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: +1. The patch looks good to me. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24391 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24391] Better repr for threading objects
Brett Cannon added the comment: While I like the concept, I don't like the reprs where the type is not the first thing listed, e.g., set Event not having Event first. The default repr and typical practice of having the type come first makes my brain initially read that repr as a set of Events instead of an Event that is set. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24391 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24391] Better repr for threading objects
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: This is for consistency with reprs of lock objects (issue21137): unlocked _thread.lock object at 0xb6f2b188 locked _thread.lock object at 0xb6f2b188 unlocked _thread.RLock object owner=0 count=0 at 0xb6f2b0b0 locked _thread.RLock object owner=-1219680512 count=2 at 0xb6f2b0b0 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24391 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24391] Better repr for threading objects
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: I'd like to see this in 3.5. This is a no-brainer improvement and has very little chance of breaking anything compared to a new OrderedDict implementation. -- nosy: +larry versions: +Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24391 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24383] consider implementing __await__ on concurrent.futures.Future
Stefan Behnel added the comment: (Copying my review comment here so that it doesn't get lost as it's more of a general design thing than a specific review comment.) Having Future know and deal with asyncio seems wrong to me. asyncio should be able to deal *somehow* with a Future that is being awaited, but a Future shouldn't require asyncio in order to be awaited. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24383 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24394] TypeError: popitem() takes no keyword arguments
Ram Rachum added the comment: I'm seeing a similar problem with `move_to_end` and its `last` keyword argument. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24394 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24395] webbrowser.py update to use argparse.py
New submission from Hasan Diwan: The webbrowser module uses getopt, which needs to be ripped out and replaced with argparse. The attached file does just this. -- components: Library (Lib) files: webbrowser.py messages: 244913 nosy: Hasan Diwan, georg.brandl priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: webbrowser.py update to use argparse.py type: enhancement versions: Python 2.7 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39641/webbrowser.py ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24395 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24195] Add `Executor.filter` to concurrent.futures
Ram Rachum added the comment: A problem I just realized with Brian's 2-line implementation of `filter`: It doesn't work for iterables which aren't sequences, since it attempts to exhaust the iterable twice. So if you have a non-sequence you'll have to make it into a sequence first. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24195 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24255] Replace debuglevel-related logic with logging
Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +berker.peksag ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24255 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24391] Better repr for threading objects
Larry Hastings added the comment: I'll allow it. But I agree with Brett, I really would prefer that the type be the first thing in the repr. I'd rather fix the lock objects than compound our error. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24391 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18003] lzma module very slow with line-oriented reading.
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
bz2 will gain great benefit from such optimization too.
Microbenchmark results:
$ ./python -m timeit -s import gzip -- f=gzip.GzipFile('words.gz', 'r')
for line in f: pass
2.7: 10 loops, best of 3: 374 msec per loop
3.2: 10 loops, best of 3: 325 msec per loop
3.3: 10 loops, best of 3: 311 msec per loop
3.4: 10 loops, best of 3: 328 msec per loop
3.5: 10 loops, best of 3: 325 msec per loop
3.5+decomp-optim.v3: 10 loops, best of 3: 61.2 msec per loop
$ ./python -m timeit -s import bz2 -- f=bz2.BZ2File('words.bz2', 'r') for
line in f: pass
2.7: 10 loops, best of 3: 92.1 msec per loop
3.2: 10 loops, best of 3: 92.4 msec per loop
3.3: 10 loops, best of 3: 567 msec per loop
3.4: 10 loops, best of 3: 535 msec per loop
3.5: 10 loops, best of 3: 603 msec per loop
3.5+decomp-optim.v2: 10 loops, best of 3: 525 msec per loop
3.5+decomp-optim.v3: 10 loops, best of 3: 131 msec per loop
$ python -m timeit -s import lzma -- f=lzma.LZMAFile('words.xz', 'r') for
line in f: pass
2.7: 10 loops, best of 3: 49.4 msec per loop
3.3: 10 loops, best of 3: 1.67 sec per loop
3.4: 10 loops, best of 3: 400 msec per loop
3.5: 10 loops, best of 3: 423 msec per loop
3.5+decomp-optim.v3: 10 loops, best of 3: 89.6 msec per loop
The fact that bz2 and lzma have 5-15% regression in 3.5 (comparing to 3.4)
makes applying this patch to 3.5 more desirable.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39640/decomp-optim.v3.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18003
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24391] Better repr for threading objects
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Would following reprs good? Event: set at 0xb710ec8c Event: unset at 0xb710ec8c (what is better: unset or clear?) Should the repr contain the module name (threading.Event: set at 0xb710ec8c)? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24391 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24394] TypeError: popitem() takes no keyword arguments
Eric Snow added the comment: This has been fixed in issue24368. The fix came just after the beta 2 release. -- resolution: - duplicate stage: - resolved status: open - closed superseder: - Some C OrderedDict methods need to support keyword arguments. ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24394 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24255] Replace debuglevel-related logic with logging
Eryn Wells added the comment: Hi. This is my first issue, but I'd be willing to have a go at updating this module. Do either of you have specific ideas about what changes you want here? My thought was to import logging, create a logger object, and start by replacing all the self.debuglevel stuff with appropriate log statements. Does that make sense? Do each of the classes need separate loggers, or is just one module-level logger enough? -- nosy: +erynofwales ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24255 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24395] webbrowser.py update to use argparse.py
Berker Peksag added the comment: Thanks! A few comments: * New features like this can only go into Python 3.6 (the default branch) * The CLI is partially tested (see Lib/test/test_webbrowser.py). You'll need to add additional tests (e.g. add tests for the -t and -h options) * It would be nice if you could send your changes in a patch format. Please see https://docs.python.org/devguide/patch.html for more information -- nosy: +berker.peksag stage: - needs patch versions: +Python 3.6 -Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24395 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24396] Provide convenience function for paths relative to the current module
New submission from Madison May: I often find myself trying to access a file relative to the module I'm working on. When this occurs, I'll often use something like the following: ``` os.path.abspath(os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), data/resource.pkl)) ``` I have good reason to believe that I'm not the only one, as searching for other examples of this code on github returns ~20k exact matches: https://github.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93q=%22os.path.abspath%28os.path.join%28os.path.dirname%28__file__%29%22+type=Coderef=searchresults Low priority, but a more concise way of achieving the same result would be much appreciated. -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 244920 nosy: madison.may priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Provide convenience function for paths relative to the current module type: enhancement versions: Python 3.5, Python 3.6 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24396 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24394] TypeError: popitem() takes no keyword arguments
New submission from Ram Rachum: Python 3.5.0b2 (v3.5.0b2:7a088af5615b, May 31 2015, 06:22:19) [MSC v.1900 64 bit (AMD64)] on win32 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. import collections o=collections.OrderedDict() o.popitem(last=True) Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in module TypeError: popitem() takes no keyword arguments -- messages: 244906 nosy: cool-RR priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: TypeError: popitem() takes no keyword arguments ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24394 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24391] Better repr for threading objects
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: I think the module name is useful, since there are also multiprocessing events and semaphores. Also, Event is a fairly generic name which may be used in other contexts (e.g. GUI libraries). set and unset sound good to me. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24391 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24391] Better repr for threading objects
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Here is updated patch. Now the repr always starts with the qualified class name. threading.Semaphore: 10 at 0xb710ec8c threading.BoundedSemaphore: 7/10 at 0xb6ff1d6c threading.Event: unset at 0xb710ec8c threading.Event: set at 0xb710ec8c threading.Barrier: 0/10 at 0xb6ff1d6c threading.Barrier: 3/10 at 0xb6ff1d6c threading.Barrier: 0/10, broken at 0xb6ff1d6c But there is other question. Should reprs be consistent with reprs of corresponding classes in multiprocessing and asyncio modules? In multiprocessing: Semaphore(value=10) BoundedSemaphore(value=10, maxvalue=10) In asyncio: asyncio.locks.Event object at 0xb6fa180c [unset] asyncio.locks.Event object at 0xb6fa180c [set] asyncio.locks.Event object at 0xb6fa180c [unset,waiters:3] asyncio.locks.Semaphore object at 0xb6cec26c [unlocked,value:10] asyncio.locks.Semaphore object at 0xb6cec26c [locked] asyncio.locks.Semaphore object at 0xb6cec26c [locked, waiters:3] -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39642/threading_objects_reprs_2.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24391 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24395] webbrowser.py update to use argparse.py
Mark Lawrence added the comment: This strikes me as pointless code churn. -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24395 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24396] Provide convenience function for paths relative to the current module
Martin Panter added the comment: There is also pkgutil.get_data(), but that returns the file contents rather than file path, which has rarely been useful to me. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24396 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24398] Update test_capi to use test.support.script_helper
Christie added the comment: I can't seem to get test_no_FatalError_infinite_loop to fail - I tried reverting the fix that this was verifying, but the test still passed and no infinite loop to be seen. I'm wondering if this is because I can't reproduce it on a mac. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24398 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24252] IDLE removes elements from tracebacks.
ppperry added the comment: Another example of this overzealous removing is when you create a module named rpc, run, RemoteDebugger, or bdb. For example (in this environment, a file in the current directory named rpc.py exists and refers to the undefined name bar): import rpc Traceback (most recent call last): File pyshell#x, line 1, in module import rpc NameError: name 'bar' is not defined The correct traceback is: Traceback (most recent call last): File pyshell#x, line 1, in module File rpc.py, line 2, in module bar NameError: name 'bar' is not defined The IDLE debugger also refuses to debug code in the above file (only if it is named rpc not any of the other names). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24252 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14586] TypeError: truncate() takes no keyword arguments
Martin Panter added the comment: See also Issue 23738 and PEP 457 for fixing the documentation instead, possibly something like truncate(size=None, /). Also, Issue 17003 has changed some of the keywords to be more consistent, making parts of this patch incorrect. -- nosy: +vadmium ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14586 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24033] Update _test_multiprocessing.py to use script helpers
Christie added the comment: run_python and spawn_python are basically the same, I need to reconcile those. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24033 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18576] Document test.support.script_helper
Christie added the comment: @ncoghlan I've taken the test.rst changes from the previous diff and reviewed them against the latest script_helper (including updates from issue24033). Nothing had fallen behind, but I've added what was missing. * I've realized that spawn_python and the helper run_python I added in issue24033 are basically the same so I will reconcile those * Is there some way to load the docstrings from script_helper.py in test.rst instead of writing explanations for each method twice? -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39645/issue18576.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18576 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23981] Update test_unicodedata.py to use script_helpers
Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com: -- stage: - patch review versions: +Python 3.6 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23981 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24252] IDLE removes elements from tracebacks.
ppperry added the comment: Is there any reason why the end of the traceback, rather then just the beginning, needs to be pruned in the first place? Additionally, the search for pdb in the tb method will still undesirably prune the traceback if someone invents there own buggy debugger that subclasses from bdb.Bdb. Would this cleanup function work? def cleanup_traceback(tb): idle_directory = os.path.dirname(__file__) while os.path.dirname(tb[0][0]) == idle_directory: del tb[0] [rest of code not having to do with pruning tracebacks] The only situation that this function would behave wrongly is when someone launches IDLE from the shell (Why would they do that?) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24252 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24396] Provide convenience function for paths relative to the current module
Martin Panter added the comment: This feature could be handy for finding test files in test suites. However I don’t think the abspath() step is necessary. We kind of want a urljoin() for OS paths, that automatically removes the current file name. As a new feature I think it would be too late for 3.5. There is the recently added “pathlib” module. I haven’t used it much, and it doesn’t have the perfect API for the job, but maybe this is good enough: vadmium@localhost:~/proj/python/lib$ cat demo_package/__init__.py from pathlib import PurePath print(PurePath(__file__).with_name(sibling.pkl)) print(PurePath(__file__).parent.joinpath(data/resource.pkl)) vadmium@localhost:~/proj/python/lib$ python3 -bWall -c 'import demo_package' /home/proj/python/lib/demo_package/sibling.pkl /home/proj/python/lib/demo_package/data/resource.pkl -- nosy: +vadmium versions: -Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24396 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18576] Document test.support.script_helper
Martin Panter added the comment: If you diffed your patch from a public revision in the main repository, there should be a nice “Review” link. Anyway, here are some comments on issue18576.patch: +.. function:: assert_python_ok(*args, **env_vars) + + Runs the interpreter with *args* and optional environment + variables, asserting that *env_vars* succeeds (``rc == 0``). Perhaps you mean *env_vars* are the optional environment variables, and that the interpreter is asserted to have succeeded. Also maybe clarify where the *__cleanenv* and *__isolated* keywords come from? Function signatures? Also applies to assert_python_failure(), run_python/_until_end(). Maybe it is worth mentioning that assert_python_ok/failure() strip whitespace from the stderr stream. I seem to remember being tricked by this (writing a test to ensure stderr ended in a newline or something). + ``stdout`` are configured as binary pipes and ``stderr`` is merged with + ``stdout``.. There are two full stops above here.. I encourage you to start sentences with capital letters (although I admit sometimes other people do not agree with this). Suggestions: + *kw* is passed through to subprocess.Popen as additional keyword + arguments. = The *kw* arguments are passed through to subprocess.Popen. + *source* is a Unicode string which will be written to the file as UTF-8. = The *source* argument is a Unicode string which will be written to the file as UTF-8. + *depth* controls how many deeply nested the package is. = The *depth* argument controls how deeply nested the package is. + Creates a new zip archive in the given directory, containing the specified + Python script/module Needs one of those full stops I mentioned earlier :) -- nosy: +vadmium ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18576 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24396] Provide convenience function for paths relative to the current module
R. David Murray added the comment: The pkguitil.get_data function is the *right* way to access package-relative data (because in the general case the data may not be on the file system), and IMO it would not be a good idea to make it easier to do things the wrong way. Any deficiencies with get_data (and its visibility) will, I think, be addressed as part of the ongoing effort to make using zipped applications more convenient. So I'm -1 on adding a convenience function for this. -- nosy: +r.david.murray ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24396 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24397] Test asynchat makes wrong assumptions
R. David Murray added the comment: Your emendation doesn't seem to do anything differently (logic wise) than the original code. Unless I am missing something, it is pointless to track the length of the buffer separately from the contents of the buffer. The buffer knows its length. -- nosy: +r.david.murray ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24397 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24400] Awaitable ABC incompatible with functools.singledispatch
New submission from Ben Darnell: The new collections.abc.Awaitable ABC relies on __instancecheck__, which makes it incompatible with functools.singledispatch (singledispatch works based on args[0].__class__; any instance-level information is discarded). This surprised me because the first thing I tried to do with Awaitable was add it to my singledispatch-based coroutine compatibility layer. Ideally coroutine would be an actual subclass of generator, instead of a generator with an extra bit set on the instance that changes how it answers isinstance() checks. That would be a big change, though, so it might be better to just document that Awaitable is kind of unusual (if we weren't already in the beta period I might argue that the ABCs should be removed and we should just use the functions in the inspect module instead). -- components: asyncio messages: 244942 nosy: Ben.Darnell, gvanrossum, haypo, yselivanov priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Awaitable ABC incompatible with functools.singledispatch versions: Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24400 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18576] Document test.support.script_helper
Nick Coghlan added the comment: As far as using docstrings for the online docs goes, there are some useful Sphinx add-ons that we've never enabled for the main Python docs (like autodoc, blockdiag, seqdiag) that could be good options to have available. For autodoc in particular, we prefer to avoid it for the main docs because good docstring and good prose documentation don't necessarily look alike. For ease of maintenance of test.support though, I think the write a good docstring, get the online docs for free rationale is a compelling one (since these docs are core contributor facing, rather than being aimed at Python users in general) d...@python.org would be the place to ask about the appropriateness of enabling some Sphinx add-ons. While enabling them seems like a reasonable idea to me, I don't personally know if there are actually technical issues with the idea, or if there just hasn't been a volunteer to add/enable them and update https://docs.python.org/devguide/documenting.html accordingly. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18576 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24393] Test urllib2_localnet fails depending on host proxy configuration
Changes by Ned Deily n...@acm.org: -- nosy: +orsenthil stage: - patch review versions: +Python 3.6 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24393 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24397] Test asynchat makes wrong assumptions
New submission from Étienne Buira: Amount of data the server could not send back is not a reliable indication on how much data it received. -- components: Tests files: test_asynchat_check_received_len_if_received_len_matters.diff keywords: patch messages: 244922 nosy: eacb priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Test asynchat makes wrong assumptions type: behavior versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39643/test_asynchat_check_received_len_if_received_len_matters.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24397 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9517] Make test.script_helper more comprehensive, and use it in the test suite
Christie added the comment: Created issue24398 for updating test_capi. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9517 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24398] Update test_capi to use test.support.script_helper
New submission from Christie: As described in Issue9517, many test modules do not make use of the helpers in script_helpers.py to invoke the python interpreter in a subprocess. Issue9517 will be broken down into several smaller issues so we can address smaller change sets. This issue is to update test_capi.py to use script_helpers.py. -- messages: 244923 nosy: bobcatfish priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Update test_capi to use test.support.script_helper versions: Python 3.6 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24398 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24393] Test urllib2_localnet fails depending on host proxy configuration
Étienne Buira added the comment: Patch was for 2.7 Hunks about no_proxy are also relevant for other branches. -- versions: +Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24393 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
