[issue30962] Add caching to logging.Logger.isEnabledFor()

2017-07-18 Thread Avram
New submission from Avram: Checking to see if a log level is enabled can add non-insignificant time to programs with a large number of logging statements. This issue is to track a pull request which introduces caching to the logging module so checking to see if a log level is enabled takes

[issue30962] Add caching to logging.Logger.isEnabledFor()

2017-07-18 Thread Avram
Avram added the comment: Yes, though the bottleneck for normal logging is more likely in other areas so the speedup will be less noticeable. Where I notice it is with debug statements when debugging is disabled. In that scenario the bulk of the time is spent checking if the level is enabled

[issue39966] mock 3.9 bug: Wrapped objects without __bool__ raise exception

2020-03-15 Thread Avram
New submission from Avram : This bug was introduced with Issue25597 Here's some code that demonstrates the error: import sys from unittest.mock import patch with patch.object(sys, 'stdout', wraps=sys.stdout) as mockstdout: bool(sys.stdout) This works fine in 3.8

[issue39966] mock 3.9 bug: Wrapped objects without __bool__ raise exception

2020-03-27 Thread Avram
Avram added the comment: Ah, I see, yes, the documentation is a bit inconsistent. What may make more sense for some magic methods is to call the underlying object and use the return value or raise any exception that occurs. For example: __bool__ return value is bool(mock._mock_wraps) __int__

[issue39966] mock 3.9 bug: Wrapped objects without __bool__ raise exception

2020-03-27 Thread Avram
Avram added the comment: That is not necessarily the same thing, hence why there was a bug. >>> hasattr(object, '__bool__') False >>> bool(object) True I think you may be right that magic methods shouldn't magically appear for wrapped objects, except those that do magi

[issue39966] mock 3.9 bug: Wrapped objects without __bool__ raise exception

2020-03-27 Thread Avram
Avram added the comment: They are documented. That said, the subsection section could use a header. https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.mock.html#magic-mock Patch looks good! Can't think of any other test scenarios right now. -- ___ Python

[issue39966] mock 3.9 bug: Wrapped objects without __bool__ raise exception

2020-03-27 Thread Avram
Avram added the comment: Honestly, I'm not sure if any of the other magic methods behave this way. It would take a little research or someone more familiar with it. Here's more info about how __bool__ behaves. https://docs.python.org/3/reference/datamodel.html#object.__bool__

[issue39966] mock 3.9 bug: Wrapped objects without __bool__ raise exception

2020-04-27 Thread Avram
Avram added the comment: Checking for presence and then falling through to the <=3.8 behavior as in the patch, seems reasonable. The default magic method behavior presumably comes out of research, trial, and error. If the docs need to be clearer, I think that's different that scrapp

[issue31749] Request: Human readable byte amounts in the standard library

2020-08-28 Thread Avram
Avram added the comment: I looked through a lot of the suggested libraries and they all seemed either too specific to an implementation or didn't fully implement compatibility. So I created Prefixed to prove out the implementation of of an expanded format specification for float would look