Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Mariatta,
Do you think this one needs to be backported? You had originally added the
labels on the pull request, then removed them. I wasn't sure if that was
needed before being able to close this.
Thanks!
--
nosy: +Mar
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Terry,
In order to not duplicate effort, are you going to be working on these or is it
ok if I look at them? Should all the changes happen in one PR or do you want
to break them down?
Thanks!
--
___
Python
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
I've added the tests for `after` and `after_idle`. I used `update` and
`update_idletasks` to make sure they processed. Even scheduling an after event
for 0 ms didn't guarantee it would process, but I wasn't sure if there was a
better way
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
resolution: -> works for me
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.or
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Pull request:
https://github.com/python/peps/pull/577
--
nosy: +csabella
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue23
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
There was a lot of work put into this patch, but I don't think it's been
committed yet. Are any of the original authors interested in converting this
to a Github pull request on the master branch? Thanks!
--
nosy:
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Without any additional information, should this be closed as 'Works for Me'?
--
nosy: +csabella
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.o
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Christian,
Would you have any feedback on this? Thanks!
--
nosy: +christian.heimes, csabella
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
I started taking a look at this and discovered a few things. There are four
methods in the C module `_lsprof` that are within the Profiler class -
`enable`, `disable`, `getstats`, and `clear` and which are all available
through cProfile.Profile. These
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Does this need to be backported to 3.7 and 3.6? Or can it be closed as
resolved?
--
nosy: +csabella
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Thanks for pointing out #21765 - very interesting reading. :-)
Would the new str.isascii() be helpful or would it be too early to use
something only available in 3.7? It would seem that and combinations of `if
isascii() and isidentifier()` might be
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
I've made the changes requested. I wasn't sure about:
TESTFN_NONASCII - How different from TESTFN_UNICODE?
Should I move these out of test.support?:
missing_compiler_executable(cmd_names=[]) - It is used only in distutils tests
and sh
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32843>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscrib
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +5553
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32843>
___
___
Py
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
I had also noticed that the `after` commands didn't have tests. Did you want
me to add tests in a separate issue before this one is merged or did you want
me to add tests under this PR?
Thanks!
--
___
P
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +5533
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32874>
___
___
Py
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
I also moved existing comments in pyparse.py to be docstrings.
Adding the tests revealed a bug in the initialization of
self.lastopenbracketpos, but I didn't make any changes to fix it. With the
bug, the tests weren't repeatable, so I modified th
New submission from Cheryl Sabella :
Add unit tests for pyparse.py in IDLE.
--
assignee: terry.reedy
components: IDLE
messages: 312352
nosy: csabella, terry.reedy
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: IDLE: Add tests for pyparse
type: enhancement
versions: Python 3.7
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +5490
stage: needs patch -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
I can open a PR for this, but thought it might be best to discuss it first as
far as what should happen with None.
1. Raise an error that it's an incorrect call.
2. Ignore it and just return.
3. Loop through all the events and after_cancel each one.
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
I created issue32857 for the after_cancel issue. Thanks!
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32839>
___
___
New submission from Cheryl Sabella :
This was discovered while working on issue32839. An old comment added for
issue763637 resulted in further research and it was determined that the comment:
! data = self.tk.call('after', 'info', id)
! # In Tk 8.
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
>>> It is internal, it was not exposed to Tkinter users before, and the API for
>>> restoring the original Python callable is private.
I thought `bind(sequence)` also returned these internal Tcl function names?
For example, if I
New submission from Cheryl Sabella :
Serhiy had made the following comments on the pull request for issue11015, but
that PR was merged before applying his requested changes. This issue is to
address his concerns.
TESTFN_NONASCII - How different from TESTFN_UNICODE?
PGO - value? True/False
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Since there hasn't been activity on this for nearly 2 years, should it be
closed as third party? Stefan seemed to conclude that it was a WindRiver
issue. Thanks!
--
nosy: +csabella
___
Python tracker
&
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Jon/Berker,
Are you interested in making a Github pull request for this? Thanks!
--
nosy: +csabella
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue18
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Chandan or Berker,
Any interest in making a Github pull request for this patch?
--
nosy: +csabella
versions: +Python 3.7, Python 3.8 -Python 3.5, Python 3.6
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue21
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
I've made a pull request. I understand that you may not want to add this
functionality, but perhaps the docstring will answer your questions. I took it
from the Tcl docs page.
--
___
Python tracker
&
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +5466
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32839>
___
___
Py
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Thanks, Nick.
When I first came across this issue, I thought that dataclasses would take care
of what you wrote below, but after looking at the original discussion on
python-dev, I thought the problem was ordering None within a comparison with
None being a
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
I was working on the tests for issue32831. One of the methods was `__del__`
which made sure timer events were canceled with `after_cancel`. In the test,
to assert that the after events no longer existed after calling `__del__` and
after reading the Tcl
New submission from Cheryl Sabella :
In tkinter, after_cancel has a call to after info:
data = self.tk.call('after', 'info', id)
Since this is a supported command, there should be a function to access it
directly.
https://www.tcl.tk/man/tcl8.6/TclCmd/after.htm
--
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
I've been able to run the IDLE test suite on Linux.
As far as this issue, there's also a readline in test_textview that you may
want to add the encoding to, even though it's only reading __file__.
--
___
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Maybe a solution for this would be to change the name of the 'Format' menu to
something like 'Source'? Interestingly, the Format menu is available on
outwin, even though that is output-only, so I guess 'Source' would only make
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +5438
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32831>
___
___
Py
New submission from Cheryl Sabella :
Add docstrings and tests for codecontext.py.
--
assignee: terry.reedy
components: IDLE
messages: 312046
nosy: csabella, terry.reedy
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: IDLE: Add docstrings and tests for codecontext
type: enhancement
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Thanks Nick for merging. Should I open a new PR to address Serhiy's review or
fix them on the original PR?
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
keywords: +easy
stage: -> needs patch
type: behavior -> enhancement
versions: +Python 3.8 -Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
I have created a pull request adding documentation for all of test.support,
including script_helper.py. I hope this will be helpful.
--
nosy: +csabella
versions: +Python 3.8
___
Python tracker
<ht
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
pull_requests: +5420
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue11015>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
stage: -> needs patch
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32769>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscrib
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
You know, I'm not sure if I had ever seen that example before. When you click
Counter at the top of the page, it goes right to the class definition, which is
past the example.
Having said that, I really like the example. Until now, I didn't re
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
keywords: +easy
versions: +Python 3.8
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31215>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +5366
stage: test needed -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/iss
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
I created a pull request for this ticket. I did not include any of the other
issues/tickets for using the command line information on restart or any of the
issues with running certain code.
I also added template code to be used in a new editor window. It
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
dependencies: +IDLE: Add docstrings and tests for editor.py reload functions
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue5
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
keywords: +patch, patch
pull_requests: +5366, 5367
stage: test needed -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/iss
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
keywords: easy
nosy: csabella, docs@python
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Add 'annotations' to the glossary
type: enhancement
versions:
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Hi Terry,
Could you put this one on your radar for review? Thanks!
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
nosy: +pmoody
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue30528>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
That's interesting. I've always thought of Control+A to be 'select all'.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_keyboard_shortcuts
Do you think a new keybinding theme should be added for bash/emacs? I don't
know how well emacs wo
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
This is still an issue. Since it's more than updating the release version, I
think someone more knowledgeable than me should fix it. I wouldn't want to
miss something that should be included.
--
versions: +
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +5356
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32765>
___
___
Py
New submission from Cheryl Sabella :
The layout of the general tab changed with #27099, but the docstrings weren't
updated with the new widgets.
--
assignee: terry.reedy
components: IDLE
messages: 311606
nosy: csabella, terry.reedy
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
I wonder if this would make sense as a parameter to dataclass now.
--
nosy: +csabella
versions: +Python 3.8 -Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue20
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Hello,
I believe this could be closed as resolved? Do you think it should be added to
the What's New? page for 3.7?
--
nosy: +csabella
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Does this just need to be cherry-picked to 2.7 to be able to close it?
--
nosy: +csabella
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue30
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Larry,
I've made a pull request for your patch. It seemed like most of the original
text was still in place, so I thought you might still want these changes. You
had also made changes to the What's New, but I didn't include those changes.
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
pull_requests: +5337
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue16024>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
keywords: +easy
type: -> enhancement
versions: +Python 3.8
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue30516>
___
___
Py
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
It looks like this documentation patch was applied to master. Does it need to
be backported to 3.6 and 2.7 for the issue to be closed? Thanks!
--
nosy: +csabella
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
keywords: +easy
stage: -> needs patch
type: -> enhancement
versions: +Python 3.8
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/i
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
keywords: +easy
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32720>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
keywords: +easy
stage: -> needs patch
type: -> enhancement
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue27428>
___
___
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +5290
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32735>
___
___
Py
New submission from Cheryl Sabella :
On the lexical analysis doc page, in f-strings example, the following example
isn't quite right:
>>> f"{today:%b %d, %Y}" # using date format specifier
'January 27, 2017'
Submitting a patch shortly to use %B instead
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
I believe Erik opened #20082 for the BufferedWriter bug, so I think this issue
can be closed as Resolved?
--
nosy: +csabella
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue18
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Serhiy,
Did you want to revive this for 3.8?
--
nosy: +csabella
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue29
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Based on Steve's last comment on this issue, should this be closed as 'Out of
Date'?
--
nosy: +csabella
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.pyt
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
resolution: -> not a bug
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32045>
___
___
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Hello everyone,
I was interested in similar functionality for timeit and found this discussion.
I know it's too late for 3.7, but I was wondering if it would be worth putting
this on python-ideas or python-dev to try to get some consensus for a PEP
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Can this be closed as 'Not a Bug'?
--
nosy: +csabella
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32045>
___
___
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Since WindowsRegistryFinder was deprecated in 3.6, should this be closed or
should the documentation still be corrected?
--
nosy: +csabella
versions: +Python 3.7 -Python 3.5, Python 3.6
___
Python tracker
<ht
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
It depends upon your use case.
In general, if you want it to work like SQL group by, then yes, it needs to be
sorted, and I believe the documentation already covers that. However, there
are scenarios where you want to condense a string, but keep the
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Since PEP 422 was withdrawn in favor of PEP 487, should this issue be closed?
--
nosy: +csabella
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue17
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
This one looks to be partly done due to #18720 and enums.
>>> for item in socket.getaddrinfo(None, 0):
... print(item)
...
(, , 6, '', ('::1', 0,
0, 0))
(, , 17, '', ('::1', 0,
0, 0))
(, , 0, ''
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Thank you for the report. The change to the exception message was added in
#30597, but it looks like it may be too greedy. Adding the developer to the
nosy list.
--
nosy: +CuriousLearner, csabella, ncoghlan
stage: -> needs pa
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Hi David,
I've made a pull request for the way I think you wanted this documented.
Please take a look and let me know if it's even close to what you were
suggesting. Thanks! :-)
--
stage: patch review ->
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +5200
stage: needs patch -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
stage: -> needs patch
type: -> enhancement
versions: +Python 3.7 -Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/i
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
I know there are other issues to remove OrderedDicts, so should this patch be
used for BoundArguments?
--
nosy: +csabella
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue23
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
pull_requests: -5177
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue2793>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Moved to the PEP issue tracker.
https://github.com/python/peps/issues/557
--
nosy: +csabella
resolution: -> later
stage: needs patch -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bug
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
type: -> enhancement
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31698>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscrib
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
stage: needs patch -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue27505>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mai
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Thanks Nick. I've made the PRs for the versionadded and to add __class__ to
the 3.6 docs.
--
stage: patch review -> needs patch
versions: +Python 3.7 -Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
pull_requests: +5166
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue27505>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +5165
stage: needs patch -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Nick,
It looks like #32225 took care of this documentation change, so I think this
can be closed? Thanks!
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue27
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
It looks like Serhiy approved the PR on 12/13. Is it ready to merge? Thanks!
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue18
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
resolution: -> out of date
stage: resolved ->
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue17882>
___
___
Python-bugs-
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
I believe this may have been fixed in #19527.
--
nosy: +csabella
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue17
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
@John.McKay, would you be interested in converting your patch to a Github pull
request on the master branch?
--
nosy: +csabella
versions: +Python 3.7 -Python 3.4, Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<ht
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Looks like this happened in PR1898.
--
nosy: +Mariatta, csabella
stage: -> needs patch
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
@jgehrcke, would you be able to convert your patch to a Github pull request on
the master branch?
--
nosy: +csabella
stage: -> needs patch
versions: +Python 3.7 -Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python
3.4, Python
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
I converted the patch to a PR.
It wouldn't merge which means I did it manually, so please check it for errors.
Some issues I ran into:
1. The patch had a change to __slots__, but that line no longer existed and I
didn't know if I needed
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Raymond,
You approved this PR pending some test cases. Would you have the chance to
take another look?
Thanks!
Oren, it looks like you'll need to rebase before this could be merged.
--
nosy: +csabella, rhett
Change by Cheryl Sabella :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +5111
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32614>
___
___
Py
New submission from Cheryl Sabella :
If a documentation example would produce a DeprecationWarning for an invalid
escape sequence, change the example to use a raw string.
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
messages: 310386
nosy: csabella, docs@python
priority: normal
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Thank you, Zach.
There was some mention of regular expressions in #27364, but I'm still
wondering if the DeprecationWarning should be mentioned on the re doc page and
if there should be stronger language about using raw strings.
T
901 - 1000 of 1350 matches
Mail list logo