Changes by Ed Maste :
--
nosy: +emaste
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue30104>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.pyth
Changes by Ed Maste :
--
nosy: +emaste
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue24520>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.pyth
Ed Maste added the comment:
I believe the 0-based vs 1-based history is only one of a few different
inconsistencies between libedit and readline. Workarounds will be necessary
until a fixed libedit is deployed on all operating systems / distros of
interest, but yes I agree that eventually
Ed Maste added the comment:
Actually, in msg245395 I should claim the issue is with libedit / GNU readline
compatibility and/or the workarounds in Python's readline module, not that it's
specifically Issue24388.
--
___
Python trac
Ed Maste added the comment:
It looks like rust developers hit the issue in Issue24388 with lldb on Ubuntu
15.04 as well: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/26297
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13
Ed Maste added the comment:
Note that the patch in Issue24388 is more a proof of concept. I'm not sure it's
the "right" fix.
LLDB is a bit of a special case: LLDB links against libedit, but the Python
libedit module is built as if readline is in use. It turns out this &q
Ed Maste added the comment:
This issue causes the LLDB debugger to crash on FreeBSD (it uses Python as its
embedded script interpreter).
What needs to be done to make some progress on this issue?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
Ed Maste added the comment:
Presumably the #ifdefs ought to just be deleted though, relying on the runtime
detection of libedit compatibility issues on any platform.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue24
New submission from Ed Maste:
I encountered a segfault in Python's call_readline from LLDB on FreeBSD, with
libedit. There is a fix for this issue already in readline.c, but under #ifdef
__APPLE__
Backtrace:
(lldb) target create "/data/emaste/src/llvm/build/bin/lldb" --core
&
Ed Maste added the comment:
For reference, this fd leak was causing one of LLDB's tests to fail. It is now
marked XFAIL pending a resolution of this issue:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=229704
Linux is also affected, the Linux LLDB tests were previously r
Changes by Ed Maste :
--
nosy: +Ed.Maste
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue23458>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Ed Maste :
--
nosy: +Ed.Maste
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15745>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
12 matches
Mail list logo