[issue24450] Add cr_await calculated property to coroutine object
Frank Wierzbicki added the comment: This shouldn't be a problem for Jython. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24450 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16886] Doctests in test_dictcomp depend on dict order
Frank Wierzbicki added the comment: I have addressed all of the comments, but I don't know the exact procedure here. Does someone need to say Looks good to me before I push? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16886 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16886] Doctests in test_dictcomp depend on dict order
Changes by Frank Wierzbicki fwierzbi...@gmail.com: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28709/dictcomps_updated2.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16886 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16886] Doctests in test_dictcomp depend on dict order
Frank Wierzbicki added the comment: I'd love to work through the commit process myself once I get through all of the comments. My intention is to become much more active here as Jython3 starts to ramp up over the next year. It would be great if I could eventually get all of Jython's .py files into CPython's Lib (as has been discussed at previous PyCons). Getting all of the tests here would be a solid step in that direction. My plan is to go through this review process for the near future but do the commits myself. Just to be sure the 4 branches are 2.7, 3.3, 3.4 and default? And can I merge safely from 2.7 to 3.3? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16886 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16886] Doctests in test_dictcomp depend on dict order
Frank Wierzbicki added the comment: Well, we generally prefer to go through the review process always, except for relatively small commits (which some of yours may be). Good to know, in that case I'll plan to go through the review process always. 2.7 is separate from 3.x. So to commit to all four branches you commit to 3.2, merge to 3.3, merge to default, and the graft to 2.7. (Myself, I'm still using patch to do the 2.7 updates, I haven't tried graft yet.) When you say use patch to do the 2.7 update - do you mean a manual patch? I'm not ready to look into graft and would prefer to just do the regular thing for now. (In theory this should all be in the devguide...) I'll definitely be reading the devguide as I prepare to push my changes. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16886 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16886] Doctests in test_dictcomp depend on dict order
Frank Wierzbicki added the comment: I'm getting an error when I try to upload patches via Reitveld: TypeError at /review/16886/add int() argument must be a string or a number, not 'AddForm' so I'm attaching my updated patch here. Is this a known issue? If not, where should I report it? -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28702/dictcomps_updated.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16886 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16886] Doctests in test_dictcomp depend on dict order
Frank Wierzbicki added the comment: On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Frank Wierzbicki rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: Reitveld *Rietveld I see just uploading a new patch to bugs.python does the right thing so I'll just move along :) -- nosy: +Frank.Wierzbicki ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16886 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16886] Doctests in test_dictcomp depend on dict order
Frank Wierzbicki added the comment: Switched to unittest style away from doctests and created patch against 3.3. Note that at this time test_dictcomp.py is identical in 3.3 and 3.4 so merging should be pretty easy :) -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28676/dictcomp3.3.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16886 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16886] Doctests in test_dictcomp depend on dict order
Frank Wierzbicki added the comment: This patch of test_dict_comp.py was made against 2.7. It differs from the 3.3 version only one line from test import test_support as support -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28677/dictcomp2.7.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16886 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16886] Doctests in test_dictcomp depend on dict order
Frank Wierzbicki added the comment: Making these into real unit tests and switching the patch to 3.3 should be no problem. Is 2.7 still open for changes to tests? I might back port to 2.7 as well so that I can delete the customized Jython test in 2.7. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16886 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16886] Doctests in test_dictcomp depend on dict order
New submission from Frank Wierzbicki: test_dictcomp hard codes the dict output of various tests of Dict Comprehensions. Since Jython has a different dict ordering we are currently altering this test. When we get to 3.x it will be nicer if we can use this test as is. Also I've seen some discussion on Python-Dev that CPython devs want to get rid of dict ordering in the tests anyway. Patch attached, which assigns the dict values to a variable and compares it in the tests instead of just dumping the output in the doctests. -- components: Tests files: test_dictcomp.patch keywords: patch messages: 179272 nosy: fwierzbicki priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Doctests in test_dictcomp depend on dict order versions: Python 3.4 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28613/test_dictcomp.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16886 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14895] test_warnings.py EnvironmentVariableTests is a bad test
Changes by Frank Wierzbicki fwierzbi...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +fwierzbicki ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14895 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13465] A Jython section in the dev guide would be great
Frank Wierzbicki fwierzbi...@gmail.com added the comment: I have forked the devguide into http://hg.python.org/jython-docs/devguide/ -- this way I can merge changes from the main devguide as they make sense. DVCS FTW :) -- I guess this issue can be closed. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13465 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13465] A Jython section in the dev guide would be great
Changes by Frank Wierzbicki fwierzbi...@gmail.com: -- status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13465 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13465] A Jython section in the dev guide would be great
Frank Wierzbicki fwierzbi...@gmail.com added the comment: I'll take a look at the dev guide this week and see how much it differs from what I'd want to do and report back here. If it doesn't make sense to include a Jython page here I can either copy content over or link to the CPython dev guide from the Jython one. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13465 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13465] A Jython section in the dev guide would be great
New submission from Frank Wierzbicki fwierzbi...@gmail.com: Nick suggested this as a comment on a blog post of mine -- I'll come up with some content, but I wanted to log the bug straight away so I wouldn't forget. -- components: Devguide messages: 148200 nosy: brett.cannon, ezio.melotti, fwierzbicki, ncoghlan priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: A Jython section in the dev guide would be great type: feature request ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13465 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7175] unify pydistutils.cfg and distutils.cfg and use .local
Changes by Frank Wierzbicki fwierzbi...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +fwierzbicki ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7175 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue6811] add a filename argument to marshal.load*
Changes by Frank Wierzbicki fwierzbi...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +fwierzbicki ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6811 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue6816] Provide CPython command line functionality via runpy module
Changes by Frank Wierzbicki fwierzbi...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +fwierzbicki ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6816 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue6704] better col_offset for AST in statements like for a, b in ...
New submission from Frank Wierzbicki fwierzbi...@gmail.com: For statements like: for a,b in c: pass The Tuple node a,b ends up with a col_offset of 0 (the position of the for), but the col_offset should probably be 4 (the position of a). This is more consistent with other Tuple node col_offset results. -- components: Interpreter Core files: ast.diff keywords: patch messages: 91566 nosy: fwierzbicki severity: normal status: open title: better col_offset for AST in statements like for a,b in ... versions: Python 2.7 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file14727/ast.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6704 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue6704] better col_offset for AST in statements like for a, b in ...
Frank Wierzbicki fwierzbi...@gmail.com added the comment: Adding tests to test_ast.py for the three cases that exercise the for a,b scenario. Also fixed a small bug in the test code generator in test_ast.py -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file14728/ast.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6704 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue5605] Don't assume that repr of literal dicts are sorted like pprint sorts them.
New submission from Frank Wierzbicki fwierzbi...@gmail.com:
test_same_as_repr in test_pprint.py assumes repr of literal dict {5:6,
7:8} will be ordered. This definitely is not the case for Jython, and
the comments above the test appear to indicate that it is not a
guarantee of CPython either.
--
components: Tests
files: test_pprint_patch.txt
messages: 84561
nosy: fwierzbicki
severity: normal
status: open
title: Don't assume that repr of literal dicts are sorted like pprint sorts
them.
type: behavior
versions: Python 2.7
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file13471/test_pprint_patch.txt
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5605
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2617] Patch to emit -J is reserved for Jython on -J arg
Frank Wierzbicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Christian Heimes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Christian Heimes [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I've reserved -X as well. Applied in r62293 Great, thanks! While I'd love to have *both* -X and -J, is that okay with the other devs? -Frank __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2617 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2617] Patch to emit -J is reserved for Jython on -J arg
New submission from Frank Wierzbicki [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This patch adds the message -J is reserved for Jython if that arg is attempted. See http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-April/078564.html For support from BDFL. -- components: Interpreter Core files: argdashjay.diff keywords: patch messages: 65365 nosy: fwierzbicki severity: normal status: open title: Patch to emit -J is reserved for Jython on -J arg type: feature request versions: Python 2.6 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10009/argdashjay.diff __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2617 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
