[issue11367] xml.etree.ElementTree.find(all): docs are wrong
Henrik Heimbuerger added the comment: Attached patch file for the 2.7 branch. They not only touch find(), but also findtext(), which has the mistake in the documentation. Also does some related changes in the module's code comments. -- keywords: +patch nosy: +hheimbuerger Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29184/issue11367_branch27.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11367 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11367] xml.etree.ElementTree.find(all): docs are wrong
Henrik Heimbuerger added the comment: Almost identical patch for 3.2, just differs in line numbers. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29185/issue11367_branch32.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11367 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16802] fileno argument to socket.socket() undocumented
Henrik Heimbuerger added the comment: Here's a suggestion for a documentation addition. Comments on tone and content are welcome, and I'm willing to update it and submit modified patch files. This adds the following note: If a file descriptor *fileno* is specified, the other arguments are ignored and and the socket with this file descriptor is returned. Unlike :meth:`fromfd`, this does not cause a duplication of the file descriptor and therefore supports the special case of closing detached socket handles on Windows using ``socket.socket(fileno=handle).close()``. -- keywords: +patch nosy: +hheimbuerger Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29195/issue16802.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16802 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11367] xml.etree.ElementTree.find(all): docs are wrong
Henrik Heimbuerger added the comment: Eli, I tried to preserve the style (and detail) of the rest of the docs of the respective version. If I bring the 3.3 version of find() into 2.7, then it will have a lot less detail than f.e. findall() as a sibling method on the same class: http://docs.python.org/2/library/xml.etree.elementtree.html#xml.etree.ElementTree.ElementTree Is that intentional? If so, I'll happily provide adjusted patches. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11367 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11367] xml.etree.ElementTree.find(all): docs are wrong
Henrik Heimbuerger added the comment: That sounds good, Eli! I'll check the implementations and then adapt the other ElementTree methods as well. Will take until next week, though. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11367 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11367] xml.etree.ElementTree.find(all): docs are wrong
Henrik Heimbuerger added the comment: Brought the ElementTree docs for find(), findtext() and findall() in line with the default branch (now they are just referencing the methods from Element). Made the same changes in the method comments of the implementation. Separate patches for 2.7 and 3.2. Note that the implementation method comments in default (and I assume 3.3) are still wrong. Would you accept patches for that as well? -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29349/issue11367_branch27.txt ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11367 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11367] xml.etree.ElementTree.find(all): docs are wrong
Henrik Heimbuerger added the comment: Patch for 3.2. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29350/issue11367_branch32.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11367 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11367] xml.etree.ElementTree.find(all): docs are wrong
Henrik Heimbuerger added the comment: Eli, I fully understand. I was experimenting with working on Cloud9, but it unfortunately has no easy way to extract individual files, I had to recreate them locally. I hope it is correct now. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29374/issue11367_branch27.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11367 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11367] xml.etree.ElementTree.find(all): docs are wrong
Henrik Heimbuerger added the comment: for 3.2 -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29375/issue11367_branch32.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11367 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24127] Fatal error in launcher: Job information querying failed
Henrik Heimbuerger added the comment: I can confirm this issue for pip 6.1.1 on Windows 10.0.10074 for both Python 2.7.9 as well as 3.4.3. As a workaround, using python -m pip works fine (as suggested on http://stackoverflow.com/a/26428562/6278 for a different issue). -- nosy: +hheimbuerger ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24127 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24127] Fatal error in launcher: Job information querying failed
Henrik Heimbuerger added the comment: To your earlier question: yes, I can reproduce this with Python 3.4.3. This is all on Windows 10.0.10074, 64-bit. I don't have a 32-bit system to test. UAC configuration is unmodified and on the default setting (third of the four steps on the slider). Python has been installed using the MSI installer without administrative rights. On Python 2, pip has been installed using the official 6.1.1 get-pip.py. For Python 3, it has been tested both with the preinstalled pip (I believe that was 6.0.8) as well as after upgrading it from PyPI (using the python -m pip workaround). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24127 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24127] Fatal error in launcher: Job information querying failed
Henrik Heimbuerger added the comment: Dan, thanks so much for taking the time to post back here, and for the good news! -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24127 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24127] Fatal error in launcher: Job information querying failed
Henrik Heimbuerger added the comment: I can still reproduce this on the just released Windows 10 build 10130, after python -m pip uninstall pip and then python get-pip.py (which recreated the pip.exe binary for pip 7.0.3). Is there anything else I need to do to make this work now? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24127 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24127] Fatal error in launcher: Job information querying failed
Henrik Heimbuerger added the comment: Great, thanks for letting us know, Dan! -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24127 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24127] Fatal error in launcher: Job information querying failed
Henrik Heimbuerger added the comment: Happy to report that in build 10159 of Windows 10 64-bit, this just started to work again. No reinstallation of pip needed! -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24127 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
