[issue9162] License for multiprocessing files

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: We have to add the BSD header and maintain the copyright clause on all of the multiprocessing files. Apologies for the delay -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org

[issue10527] multiprocessing.Pipe problem: handle out of range in select()

Changes by Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +asksol ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10527 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue5725] process SysV-Semaphore support

Changes by Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +jnoller ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue5725 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue10348] multiprocessing: use SysV semaphores on FreeBSD

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Adding, or moving, to SYSV semaphores is very low on the list of things to do. If someone were to provide a patch, I'm sure we could consider it. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http

[issue4106] multiprocessing occasionally spits out exception during shutdown

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Brian Thorne rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: Brian Thorne hardb...@gmail.com added the comment: With the example script attached I see the exception every time. On Ubuntu 10.10 with Python 2.6 Since

[issue10845] test_multiprocessing failure under Windows

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: I'm fine with that tweak antoine -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10845

[issue3244] multipart/form-data encoding

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Yeah, despite what the RFC says, the most common usage is in web clients, and stuffing it in the email module won't be obvious to 95% of the population I think, unless that's where the implementation lives, but we can add a doc stub

[issue8713] multiprocessing needs option to eschew fork() under Linux

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: This is on my wish list; but I have not had time to do it. Patch welcome. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8713

[issue8713] multiprocessing needs option to eschew fork() under Linux

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: I pretty much agree with (b) an argument - your gut instinct is correct - there's a long standing thread in python-dev which pretty much solidified my thinking about whether or not we need this (we do). Any patch has to be backwards

[issue8995] Performance issue with multiprocessing queue (3.1 VS 2.6)

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: No - I don't know of anything which would trigger this in 3.1 off the top of my head. The performance degradation is pretty worrisome -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http

[issue9144] Import error for multiprocessing in 2.7rc2 on Windows

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: the patch looks good to me - unless someone beats me to it, I'm going to commit it shortly to fix 2.7 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9144

[issue9144] Import error for multiprocessing in 2.7rc2 on Windows

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Pushed it in r82489 - worked for me on Linux and OS/X. Please let me know if anything else comes up. -- status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org

[issue4106] multiprocessing occasionally spits out exception during shutdown

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Greg - what platform? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue4106 ___ ___ Python-bugs

[issue4106] multiprocessing occasionally spits out exception during shutdown

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Greg - this is actually a different exception then the original bug report; could you please file a new issue with the information you've provided? I'm going to need to find a 64bit ubuntu box as I don't have one right now

[issue9207] multiprocessing occasionally spits out exception during shutdown

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Thanks greg; so this affects 2.6 as well (not using the backport at all) -- assignee: - jnoller nosy: +jnoller ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9207

[issue9207] multiprocessing occasionally spits out exception during shutdown (_handle_workers)

Changes by Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com: -- title: multiprocessing occasionally spits out exception during shutdown - multiprocessing occasionally spits out exception during shutdown (_handle_workers) ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue9207] multiprocessing occasionally spits out exception during shutdown (_handle_workers)

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Oh, you mean the backport from google code? The person who stepped up to maintain that has not refreshed that in some time. I need to decide what to do with it long term. I'm pretty sure it's badly out of date

[issue9207] multiprocessing occasionally spits out exception during shutdown (_handle_workers)

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Wait - so, you are pulling svn trunk, compiling and running your test with the built python executable? I'm not following the multiprocessing-from-trunk distinction unless you're picking the module out of the tree / compiling

[issue9207] multiprocessing occasionally spits out exception during shutdown (_handle_workers)

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Alright, I'm fighting ubuntu 64 bit in my vmware install right now, I'll see if I can get it up and running. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9207

[issue9162] License for multiprocessing files

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Yes; the copyright has to stay; but the license data can leave afaik. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9162

[issue9207] multiprocessing occasionally spits out exception during shutdown (_handle_workers)

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: I can confirm with a clean ubuntu 64 install, with a clean checkout of release27 that it explodes with that exception, while the stock 2.6.5 does not. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue9207] multiprocessing occasionally spits out exception during shutdown (_handle_workers)

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: It does not seem to appear on OS/X 10.6.4 - so the only question is does this show up on Ubuntu 32bit -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9207

[issue9207] multiprocessing occasionally spits out exception during shutdown (_handle_workers)

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Correction; it can and does happen on OS/X. So, this is not a platform specific bug. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9207

[issue9207] multiprocessing occasionally spits out exception during shutdown (_handle_workers)

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Greg, can you comment out line 272 in Lib/multiprocessing/pool.py and tell me if you can reproduce? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9207

[issue9207] multiprocessing occasionally spits out exception during shutdown (_handle_workers)

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: I'm not sure if there would still be the possibility; the thing which worries me is the debug() function vanishing on us - something not good is happening on interpreter shutdown. -- ___ Python

[issue9162] License for multiprocessing files

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Hi Stefan - I'm familiar with the license/etc of the original module. This bug isn't urgent; I shot a quick email to the PSF's secretary Pat to confirm we have a contributor agreement however

[issue9162] License for multiprocessing files

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Egad No! I gotcha. I'll find out what the deal with the contrib. agreement is. Pretty sure we had to wait on it when we brought it in. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http

[issue9207] multiprocessing occasionally spits out exception during shutdown (_handle_workers)

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Greg - yeah. it's the same problem. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9207

[issue9207] multiprocessing occasionally spits out exception during shutdown (_handle_workers)

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Talking with Brett; the fix should be as simple as keeping a reference to the debug function which we have in the imports. During interpreter shutdown, the sys.modules is iterated and each module replaced with None. Since the _handle_workers

[issue9205] Parent process hanging in multiprocessing if children terminate unexpectedly

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: thanks greg; I'm going to take a look and think about this. I'd like to resolve bug 9207 first though -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9205

[issue9205] Parent process hanging in multiprocessing if children terminate unexpectedly

Changes by Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com: -- assignee: - jnoller ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9205 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue9205] Parent process hanging in multiprocessing if children terminate unexpectedly

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Ugh. I'm going to have to think about the cleanest way of handling this case of functions vanishing from us since this is going to be more widespread inside the code. Suggestions welcome

[issue9205] Parent process hanging in multiprocessing if children terminate unexpectedly

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: A+ for creativity; I wouldn't have thought of that ;) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9205

[issue9207] multiprocessing occasionally spits out exception during shutdown (_handle_workers)

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Thank you for doing that footwork Greg, it means a lot to me. I'm leaning towards the patch to swallow the errors - I just wanted to ponder it just a tiny bit longer before I pull the trigger

[issue9205] Parent process hanging in multiprocessing if children terminate unexpectedly

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Greg - I asked Ask to take a look - his celery package is a huge consumer of multiprocessing, and so I tend to run things past him as well. That said - to both of you - the fundamental problem the shutdown patch is trying to scratch

[issue9244] multiprocessing.pool: Worker crashes if result can't be encoded

Changes by Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com: -- assignee: - jnoller nosy: +gdb ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9244 ___ ___ Python

[issue9205] Parent process hanging in multiprocessing if children terminate unexpectedly

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Passing the references seems to be a losing game; for _handle_workers - we only need 1 function (debug) - for others (say _join_exited_workers), we need references to reversed/range/len. A possible alternative is to make those threads non

[issue9205] Parent process hanging in multiprocessing if children terminate unexpectedly

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: You two are bigger users of this then I currently am (the curse/blessing of switching jobs), which is why I've let you hash it out. Let me point out: my goal is to deal with errors in a way which does not cause a total crash, a lockup

[issue9205] Parent process hanging in multiprocessing if children terminate unexpectedly

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: (sorry, I thought I had replied to your comment when I hadn't!) I think we can get away with a new optional kwarg. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9205

[issue5001] Remove assertion-based checking in multiprocessing

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: @Mark Yeah - I'm the current multiprocessing maintainer. If I fix it, I'll just commit it :) I filed this as a to do against myself. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http

[issue9400] multiprocessing.pool.AsyncResult.get() messes up exceptions

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: @ray - you probably don't have the dcon binary on your path. bug.py calls a subprocess call. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9400

[issue6720] multiprocessing logging

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: The backport of multiprocessing is currently stale; and there are a few bugs in the tracker assigned to christian or myself in regards to it. If it's not too much trouble, I'd leave this one alone until the exact future of the backport can

[issue9513] test_multiprocessing skipped on Windows

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: The relative imports have been more of a pain then they've helped. I'm fine with nuking them so long as the test suite passes. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org

[issue8184] multiprocessing.managers will not fail if listening ocket already in use

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Mark - did you observe the behavior in the Op? He's not stating the the code snippet runs fine, but that the second run at the same time on windows to cause a conflict. We need to show that either running it twice, at the same time against

[issue8426] multiprocessing.Queue fails to get() very large objects

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: I don't know that it's unreasonable to send that much data, but it would certainly be slow, and I would not recommend it. Therefore, this is still on the list for when I have time -- ___ Python

[issue9586] warning: comparison between pointer and integer in multiprocessing build on Tiger

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: I agree with Antoine -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9586 ___ ___ Python-bugs

[issue9592] Limitations in objects returned by multiprocessing Pool

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Florent - Are you running the script from Freek on the buildbots, or are you just updating this bugs with other run failures? I'm having a really hard time separating things. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue8428] buildbot: test_multiprocessing timeout (test_notify_all? test_pool_worker_lifetime?)

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Is this intermittent, or consistently failing? Updating it with more buildbot failures doesn't help. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8428

[issue9586] warning: comparison between pointer and integer in multiprocessing build on Tiger

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: looks fine mark -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9586 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue9592] Limitations in objects returned by multiprocessing Pool

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Thanks Freek - we're actually discussing some stuff like this in issue9205 as well -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9592

[issue9663] importlib should exclusively open bytecode files

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Nice. -- nosy: +jnoller ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9663 ___ ___ Python-bugs

[issue8296] multiprocessing.Pool hangs when issuing KeyboardInterrupt

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: If we keep that behavior, the real problem here is that the result handler hangs if the process that reserved a job is gone, which is going to be handled by #9205. Should we mark it as a duplicate? I would tend to agree with your assessment

[issue9851] multiprocessing socket timeout will break client

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Calling it stupid doesn't incentivize me to help you, or fix it. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9851

[issue9162] License for multiprocessing files

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Michael Fladischer rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: Michael Fladischer mich...@fladi.at added the comment: Is there any timeline on when this will be fixed? It's currently blocking work on a python-related

[issue9851] multiprocessing socket timeout will break client

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Duplicate; 9897 -- resolution: - duplicate status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9851

[issue9897] multiprocessing problems

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: hume; filing this again doesn't help. I closed issue 9851 as a duplicate of this for you. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9897

[issue10015] Creating a multiproccess.pool.ThreadPool from a child thread blows up.

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: I can not, for the life of me, remember why ThreadPool is there, except as a fallback. It's also not part of the documented interface as well. Additionally, in Python 3 we now have futures

[issue9935] Faster pickling of instances

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: I doubt I, or Ask will have the time to rewrite the entire multiprocessing test suite right now to work around the change Antoine. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org

[issue6645] multiprocessing build fails on AIX - /dev/urandom (or equivalent) not found

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Sridhar can you confirm if this is still a problem on 3.2? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6645

[issue6269] threading documentation makes no mention of the GIL

Changes by Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com: -- assignee: jnoller - nobody keywords: +easy nosy: +nobody priority: normal - low ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6269

[issue9935] Faster pickling of instances

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Antoine Pitrou rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: Well, I'm not asking anyone to rewrite the entire multiprocessing test suite; and, besides, I've provided a patch myself to improve it in that respect

[issue6645] multiprocessing build fails on AIX - /dev/urandom (or equivalent) not found

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Closing per Sridhar -- status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6645

[issue9244] multiprocessing.pool: Worker crashes if result can't be encoded

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Fine w/ committing this Ask. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9244

[issue7707] multiprocess.Queue operations during import can lead to deadlocks

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Fine w/ committing this Ask. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7707

[issue8028] self.terminate() from a multiprocessing.Process raises AttributeError exception

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Fine w/ committing this Ask as-is ask. You are correct in the original intent of the code. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8028

[issue8028] self.terminate() from a multiprocessing.Process raises AttributeError exception

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Can you please expand on deeply different? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8028

[issue3770] test_multiprocessing fails on systems with HAVE_SEM_OPEN=0

Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Bumping up _ I'll need help with a patch -- priority: - release blocker ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3770

[issue3927] dummy multiprocessing needs to use properties

Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: The patch looks fine to me Ben, if you want to apply it. ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3927

[issue3770] test_multiprocessing fails on systems with HAVE_SEM_OPEN=0

Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I've been thinking about this - Right now, having a working mp.synchronize module, and thread support is key to package currently. For 2.6 - it's really too late to try to mock up a working mp.synchronize module, or significantly change

[issue3770] test_multiprocessing fails on systems with HAVE_SEM_OPEN=0

Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Hows this error look: import multiprocessing Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in module File /Users/jesse/open_source/subversion/python- trunk/Lib/multiprocessing/__init__.py, line 178, in module function, see

[issue3770] test_multiprocessing fails on systems with HAVE_SEM_OPEN=0

Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Is thereforce an actual word? Otherwise it looks fine to me. Yeah, I caught that. Rather than disable the entire package, which would be frustrating to many - I've changed it to only disable mp.synchronize for now, patch is pending my final

[issue3770] test_multiprocessing fails on systems with HAVE_SEM_OPEN=0

Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Here's a patch, works on my machine. Please review it and make sure it satisfies what we've spoken about. -- keywords: +needs review, patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11656/issue3770.diff

[issue3770] test_multiprocessing fails on systems with HAVE_SEM_OPEN=0

Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: On Sep 29, 2008, at 6:36 PM, Damien Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Damien Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I can confirm that the patch works on OpenBSD -current. Only one nit: Does this line in Lib/test

[issue4012] Minor errors in multiprocessing docs

Changes by Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- assignee: georg.brandl - jnoller nosy: +jnoller ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue4012

[issue4012] Minor errors in multiprocessing docs

Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Which examples are you talking about Georg? ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue4012 ___ ___ Python

[issue4012] Minor errors in multiprocessing docs

Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Also, several things which are properties are still referred to as methods and include the () chars for the call ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue4012

[issue4012] Minor errors in multiprocessing docs

Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Ok, let me take a look at that ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue4012 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue4028] Problem compiling the multiprocessing module on sunos5

Changes by Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- assignee: - jnoller nosy: +jnoller priority: - normal versions: +Python 3.0 ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue4028

[issue3876] multiprocessing does not compile on *BSD and potentialy other systems

Changes by Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- assignee: - jnoller nosy: +jnoller priority: - normal ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3876

[issue3876] multiprocessing does not compile on systems which do not define sem_timedwait

Changes by Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- title: multiprocessing does not compile on *BSD and potentialy other systems - multiprocessing does not compile on systems which do not define sem_timedwait ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

[issue4012] Minor errors in multiprocessing docs

Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: fix_up_logger doesn't exist in the port, but is used in the mp_distributing.py example ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue4012

[issue4208] Make multiprocessing compatible with Python 2.4 and 2.5

Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Are you suggesting we apply this to the 2.6/2.7 branch? ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue4208

[issue4204] Cannot build _multiprocessing, math, mmap and readline of Python 2.6 on FreeBSD 4.11 w/ gcc 2.95.4

Changes by Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: +jnoller ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue4204 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue4204] Cannot build _multiprocessing, math, mmap and readline of Python 2.6 on FreeBSD 4.11 w/ gcc 2.95.4

Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Please see issue3770 for details on the multiprocessing library, SEM_OPEN and freebsd. The short answer is that FreeBSD support for MP is not available. ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

[issue4449] AssertionError in Doc/includes/mp_benchmarks.py

Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: The 3.0 doc/example issue is in issue 3256 I plan on fixing all the doc/example issue this/next week. ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue4449

[issue4449] AssertionError in Doc/includes/mp_benchmarks.py

Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Yes, I have a pending patch. I'll see if I can steal some time today to check it in. On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Christian Heimes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Christian Heimes [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Are you able to fix

[issue4451] multiprocessing fails with Invalid thread state for this thread on 2.4 and 2.5

Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: As ben mentioned, this is already fixed in core. See issue 1683 - this is only a problem when running in 2.5/2.4 -- resolution: - duplicate status: open - closed ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED

[issue1683] Thread local storage and PyGILState_* mucked up by os.fork()

Changes by Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: +jnoller ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1683 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue4450] 2to3 run changed multiprocessing.Queue() to multiprocessing.queue()

Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Hmm, we should actually rename mp.Queue to mp.queue at one point -- nosy: +jnoller ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue4450

[issue4449] AssertionError in Doc/includes/mp_benchmarks.py

Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I guess you just 2to3'ed the examples ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue4449 ___ ___ Python-bugs

[issue4193] Multiprocessing example

Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Added in r67419 on trunk, merged to py3k and 2.6.1 -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue4193

[issue3518] multiprocessing: BaseManager.from_address documented but doesn't exist

Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Added the mp.managers shared queue example, fixed the docs in r67419 on trunk. merged to py3k and 2.6.1 maint -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

[issue4012] Minor errors in multiprocessing docs

Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Warning added for georg's issue, all doc errors fixed on trunk, py3k and 2.6.1 maint. see r67419 -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

[issue4238] BSD support for multiprocessing.cpu_count

Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Fixed, trunk r67423 -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue4238

[issue4449] AssertionError in Doc/includes/mp_benchmarks.py

Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: This is not a doc bug - in actuality, the mp_benchmarks.py example is exposing an assertion error in sharedctypes.py. The doc-related bugs Christian and I spoke about have been fixed, however the main issue for this (the assertion error

[issue4449] AssertionError in Doc/includes/mp_benchmarks.py

Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: 2.6.0 shipped with the assertion error. Unfortunately, I'm tapped out at the day job right now, so I won't have a fix prepped and tested in time. -- priority: release blocker - deferred blocker

[issue4449] AssertionError in Doc/includes/mp_benchmarks.py

Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: +1 on Amaury's patch, however I wouldn't change the assert right now - Christian's suggestion does make sense to change globally post 3.0 Amaury, do you want to submit it? ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED

[issue4593] Documentation for multiprocessing - Pool.apply()

Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Ah, I see what you're talking about David. Good catch. It wouldn't make sense to run the apply() in all of the workers, as apply() is a single function(...) call. map() however is done in parallel amongst all workers

[issue3206] Multiprocessing Array and sharedctypes.Array error in docs/implementation

Changes by Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- resolution: - duplicate status: open - closed ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3206

[issue3206] Multiprocessing Array and sharedctypes.Array error in docs/implementation

Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Dupe, issue4449 ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3206 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >