Leonardo Bianconi added the comment:
@haypo
For adding compatibility for atomics based on @Joshua.J.Cogliati change, I
propose:
#ifndef Py_LIMITED_API
#ifndef Py_ATOMIC_H
#define Py_ATOMIC_H
#include dynamic_annotations.h
#include pyconfig.h
#if defined(HAVE_STD_ATOMIC)
#ifdef __cplusplus
#include atomic
#define _Atomic(T) atomicT
using namespace std;
#else
#include stdatomic.h
#endif
#endif
#ifdef __cplusplus
extern C {
#endif
/* This is modeled after the atomics interface from C1x, according to
* the draft at
* http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/wg14/www/docs/n1425.pdf.
* Operations and types are named the same except with a _Py_ prefix
* and have the same semantics.
*
* Beware, the implementations here are deep magic.
*/
#if defined(HAVE_STD_ATOMIC)
typedef enum _Py_memory_order {
_Py_memory_order_relaxed = memory_order_relaxed,
_Py_memory_order_acquire = memory_order_acquire,
_Py_memory_order_release = memory_order_release,
_Py_memory_order_acq_rel = memory_order_acq_rel,
_Py_memory_order_seq_cst = memory_order_seq_cst
} _Py_memory_order;
typedef struct _Py_atomic_address {
_Atomic (void) *_value;
} _Py_atomic_address;
typedef struct _Py_atomic_int {
atomic_int _value;
} _Py_atomic_int;
... (rest same)
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file38508/atomicfix.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23644
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
